Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$88.74
▼ $5.49 (-5.8%)
Market data updated: 09/17 09:52 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$21.23B
Day Range
$88.58 - $93.67
52-Week Range
$84.99 - $126.62
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
EXE is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
-9.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $176.94 vs. price $88.74 (+99.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.05 (3y annualized return 1.3% / max drawdown 29.2%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
75/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
+1.9%
Median 40D Outcome
61/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+6.0% … +11.9%
🟡 Base
7%
+0.0% … +0.0%
🔴 Bearish
47%
-6.4% … -3.4%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.0%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
3 occurrence(s) · 67% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -1.9% … +4.6% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 67% (42%–85%) | +1.7% | -0.4% … +3.5% | +0.6% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.0% | -4.0% … +7.2% | +0.8% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.9% | -2.5% … +8.6% | +1.7% |
| 60D | 60% (36%–80%) | +3.7% | -2.8% … +12.4% | +1.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | 75/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -6.8% | -5.5% |
| 2023-12-06 | 74/100 | Downtrend | +7.1% | +12.1% |
| 2026-06-11 | 72/100 | Downtrend | +0.0% | +12.8% |
| 2026-05-27 | 71/100 | Downtrend | -4.5% | +3.7% |
| 2026-04-08 | 71/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -3.3% | -11.3% |
| 2026-01-15 | 71/100 | Downtrend | +4.6% | -3.8% |
| 2025-12-16 | 71/100 | Consolidation | -6.6% | +1.1% |
| 2025-08-18 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +4.8% | +27.5% |
| 2025-07-03 | 70/100 | Consolidation | -6.2% | -1.8% |
| 2023-02-01 | 68/100 | Downtrend | -2.0% | -1.3% |
| 2025-02-27 | 67/100 | Consolidation | +12.2% | +18.6% |
| 2023-05-31 | 67/100 | Downtrend | +11.6% | +13.1% |
| 2023-09-21 | 66/100 | Consolidation | +7.3% | -8.4% |
| 2025-10-16 | 65/100 | Consolidation | +19.6% | +4.5% |
| 2024-07-29 | 65/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -3.5% | +10.2% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/04/202657
This Week
75
7D Ago
↓ -18
Weakening
Technical
13
7D Ago: 83
↓ -70
Fundamental
64
7D Ago: 64
→ 0
Growth
82
7D Ago: 82
→ 0
Valuation
67
7D Ago: 67
→ 0
News
100
7D Ago: 100
→ 0
Quality
63
7D Ago: 63
→ 0
Risk
48
7D Ago: 48
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
13d ago · $99.05
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
13d ago · $99.05
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
57 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
73
$94.66
Now
57
$88.74
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
63
Value
67
Momentum
13
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
64
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING EXE...
Recent media coverage of **Expand Energy (EXE)** has focused on its strong financial momentum and growth potential, particularly in the Gulf Coast energy market. Analysts highlight its **cash-generating capabilities**, **breakout technical setup**, and **value creation from the Twin Eagle project**, positioning the company to benefit from rising gas demand. Some reports also emphasize **hedging strategies** for short-term stability while projecting long-term upside, despite recent stock volatility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Expand Energy. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
47
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
64
Technical
13
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
47
Narrative Gap
-7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixated on the 2.3% gap below resistance, a common threshold for hesitation. Herding is present but muted, as EXE underperformed peers, indicating selective participation rather than blind following. Euphoria is constrained by a 45% discount to DCF, while FOMO is fueled by momentum and sentiment—yet the narrative gap (7 points) hints at a disconnect between bullish price action and valuation fundamentals. The key question: Will traders break the resistance anchor, or will the valuation gap dampen further rallies?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:12 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Expand Energy (EXE) could benefit from rising Gulf Coast gas demand"
"value creation from the Twin Eagle acquisition"
"strong buy DCF target $134 (+35%)"
"A company that generates cash isn’t automatically a winner"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s stark divide between methodologies reveals a clash between growth-focused and value/cycle-sensitive investors. Peter Lynch and Edgar Lawrence Smith, both drawn to long-term growth and undervaluation, rate it near-perfectly (96 and 94), seeing it as a ‘buy-and-hold for a decade’ candidate where the price hasn’t yet reflected its potential. Meanwhile, Fisher and Housel also praise its quality and compounding traits, though with slightly lower scores (85 and 82), suggesting they’d still favor it but with more caution. However, Graham’s Defensive and Enterprising Investor models (78 and 41) and cycle-sensitive thinkers like Marks (37) and Nelson (31) flag risks—whether overvaluation, stretched expectations, or liquidity concerns—leading them to dismiss it outright. Even Livermore and Schwager (53 and 21) see no clear trend or setup, while Bagehot’s liquidity warnings and the efficient-market skeptics (49) further muddy the waters, illustrating how a stock’s appeal hinges entirely on whether you prioritize growth, value, or macro conditions.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 94
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 85
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 81
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 79
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 72
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 57
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 47
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 40
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
20.4%
Net Margin
15.0%
EBITDA Margin
45.0%
ROE
9.8%
ROA
6.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.67
Cash
$616.00M
Total Debt
$5.01B
Current Ratio
1.01
Debt/Equity
0.27
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 13.8.2026 | $0.575 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.575 |
| 13.5.2026 | $0.575 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.575 |
| 4.3.2026 | $0.575 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.575 |
| 12.11.2025 | $0.575 |
| 14.8.2025 | $1.465 |
| 13.8.2025 | $1.465 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.575 |
| 14.5.2025 | $0.575 |
| 11.3.2025 | $0.575 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$88.74
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$176.94
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+99.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $2.30B | $2.11B |
| 2 | 19.4% | $2.74B | $2.31B |
| 3 | 13.8% | $3.12B | $2.41B |
| 4 | 8.1% | $3.38B | $2.39B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $3.46B | $2.25B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.84B
Terminal Value
$54.55B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$35.46B
Enterprise Value
$46.92B
Net Debt
$4.39B
Equity Value
$42.53B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$77.29
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$77.29
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 5 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Barrons.com · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
StockStory · 1.9.2026
Expand Energy (EXE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EXE currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, EXE's estimated fair value is $176.94, which is 99.4% above the current price of $88.74. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
EXE's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $176.94 vs. price $88.74 (+99.4%); Revenue growth (last year): 186.3%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 266.4%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.05 (3y annualized return 1.3% / max drawdown 29.2%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — EXE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 8 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wichterich Michael | Open Market Purchase | 12.6.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $88.90 |
| Wichterich Michael | Open Market Purchase | 12.6.2026 | 85,498 | +1,000 | $88.90 |
| Emerson Sarah A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,331 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Kehr Catherine A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,331 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Teunissen Marcel | Open Market Purchase | 4.6.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $92.88 |
| JOHNSON S P IV | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,331 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Wichterich Michael | Open Market Purchase | 4.6.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $93.36 |
| Gallagher Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,331 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Steck Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,746 | +2,746 | $96.53 |
| Duncan Timothy S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,331 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Konar Shameek | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,331 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Duster Benjamin | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 2,331 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Teunissen Marcel | Open Market Purchase | 4.6.2026 | 11,144 | +2,000 | $92.88 |
| Wichterich Michael | Open Market Purchase | 4.6.2026 | 84,498 | +1,000 | $93.36 |
| JOHNSON S P IV | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 19,895 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Duster Benjamin | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 17,932 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Konar Shameek | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 10,042 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Kehr Catherine A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 9,335 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Gallagher Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 20,248 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Steck Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 20,258 | +2,746 | $96.53 |
| Duncan Timothy S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 19,051 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Emerson Sarah A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.6.2026 | 17,932 | +2,331 | $96.53 |
| Teunissen Marcel | Open Market Purchase | 7.5.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $96.43 |
| Teunissen Marcel | Open Market Purchase | 7.5.2026 | 9,144 | +2,000 | $96.43 |
| Teunissen Marcel | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.4.2026 | 5,144 | +5,144 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,403,425 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,615,910 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology