Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$209.51
▼ $2.06 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 11:35 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$413.94B
Day Range
$207.41 - $211.90
52-Week Range
$146.49 - $217.78
Beta
—
Next Earnings
29.10.2026
Support
$173.51
Resistance
$217.78
CVX is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+31.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.01
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.36 (3y annualized return 7.8% / max drawdown 21.8%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
82/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
-3.4%
Median 40D Outcome
66/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+2.3% … +10.0%
🟡 Base
7%
+0.5% … +0.5%
🔴 Bearish
53%
-5.5% … -3.5%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 40 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -2.3%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
13 occurrence(s) · 31% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.4% | -1.2% … +1.8% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.7% | -2.9% … +2.4% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | -2.3% | -4.6% … +2.7% | +0.9% |
| 40D | 27% (11%–52%) | -3.4% | -4.9% … +3.3% | +0.8% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -4.0% | -8.4% … +1.5% | +1.1% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | 82/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +3.5% | +1.1% |
| 2022-11-21 | 78/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -4.7% | -10.1% |
| 2022-02-15 | 78/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +17.5% | +22.7% |
| 2021-12-02 | 78/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +1.9% | +30.0% |
| 2024-12-05 | 78/100 | Uptrend | -7.6% | -4.0% |
| 2018-05-22 | 78/100 | Uptrend | -2.3% | -8.2% |
| 2021-12-21 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +11.2% | +40.1% |
| 2019-03-28 | 77/100 | Uptrend | -4.8% | +1.5% |
| 2019-06-27 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +0.5% | +1.5% |
| 2021-06-17 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -7.9% | -8.5% |
| 2024-05-06 | 76/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -3.8% | -6.0% |
| 2025-02-27 | 75/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +6.4% | -12.8% |
| 2025-07-22 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +1.3% | +1.4% |
| 2025-09-04 | 73/100 | Uptrend | -2.7% | -4.2% |
| 2026-04-07 | 72/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -4.4% | -16.0% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
55
Value
50
Momentum
65
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
57
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING CVX...
Recent media coverage of Chevron Corporation has centered on its stock performance amid rising oil prices—driven by geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and Iran—with shares briefly surpassing key buy thresholds. The company is also prominently featured for its ambitious $7 billion expansion plan in Venezuela, aiming for **600,000 barrels per day (BPD)** by 2031, framed as a low-cost growth strategy. Analysts discuss the risks of this timeline while highlighting Chevron’s financial targets, including dividend income potential for investors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Chevron Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
42
Fundamentals
57
Technical
65
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+21%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
CVX’s psychology is dominated by anchoring (77), as the stock’s proximity to resistance (1.2%) suggests traders are fixating on this level. Confirmation bias (36) and FOMO (36) also play roles, with extreme sentiment (100/100) and a narrative-reality gap (28) reinforcing positive narratives despite weak revenue growth. Overconfidence (7) is muted, as price momentum slightly exceeds fundamentals. The key question is whether traders will hold or break resistance, given the lack of panic or herding signals. The dominant state hinges on resistance validation or rejection.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:58 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Chevron shares move past a buy point as oil surges (Article 1)"
"Chevron targets 600,000 barrels per day in Venezuela by 2031 (Article 3, 7, 8)"
"Oil prices jump above $100 after US-Iran war escalates (Article 4)"
"Investors need over $146,000 for $5,000 annual passive income from Chevron (Article 5, 6)"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 3/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each investor, the model estimates that Housel, Smith and Marks view CVX as a solid long‑term compounder, reflected in scores in the low‑80s to high‑60s and verdicts highlighting stability and reasonable pricing. In contrast, Graham’s defensive and enterprising criteria, Fisher’s quality‑growth focus, and Veblen’s skepticism produce very low scores (below 15) and verdicts about lack of safety or growth for its own sake. Mid‑range scores from Livermore, Loeb, Mackay, Schwager and Bagehot stem from their emphasis on trend, crowd sentiment, and liquidity risk, yielding mixed or neutral conclusions. The divergence thus mirrors each methodology’s core filter—value‑orientation and cycle comfort generate optimism, while growth‑quality and strict margin‑of‑safety filters drive caution.
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 79
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 58
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 56
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 55
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 42
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 34
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 11
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 9
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 3
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
42.8%
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
6.5%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
6.6%
ROA
3.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.65
Cash
$7.29B
Total Debt
$2.35B
Current Ratio
1.15
Debt/Equity
0.01
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 19.8.2026 | $1.780 |
| 19.5.2026 | $1.780 |
| 18.5.2026 | $1.780 |
| 17.2.2026 | $1.780 |
| 16.2.2026 | $1.780 |
| 18.11.2025 | $1.710 |
| 17.11.2025 | $1.710 |
| 19.8.2025 | $1.710 |
| 18.8.2025 | $1.710 |
| 19.5.2025 | $1.710 |
| 18.5.2025 | $1.710 |
| 14.2.2025 | $1.710 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$100.46
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$98.00
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Chevron Corporation (CVX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CVX currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CVX's technical score is 65/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.01; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.36 (3y annualized return 7.8% / max drawdown 21.8%); Revenue growth (last year): -6.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -31.8%.
Yes — CVX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WARNER CYNTHIA J | I | 28.8.2026 | 19 | +19 | $201.86 |
| HEWSON MARILLYN A | I | 28.8.2026 | 213 | +213 | $201.86 |
| Pate R. Hewitt | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 2,470 | -2,470 | $205.11 |
| Walz Andrew Benjamin | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 16,800 | -16,800 | $201.06 |
| Walz Andrew Benjamin | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 12,700 | -12,700 | — |
| Walz Andrew Benjamin | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 4,100 | +4,100 | $88.20 |
| Walz Andrew Benjamin | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 12,700 | +12,700 | $132.69 |
| Moyo Dambisa F | Gift | 17.8.2026 | 350 | -350 | — |
| Walz Andrew Benjamin | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 4,100 | -4,100 | — |
| Wirth Michael K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 317,100 | +317,100 | $88.20 |
| Wirth Michael K | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 10,311 | -10,311 | $201.05 |
| Wirth Michael K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.8.2026 | 317,100 | -317,100 | — |
| Wirth Michael K | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 306,789 | -306,789 | $200.44 |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 4,850 | +4,850 | $117.24 |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 4,850 | -4,850 | — |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 4,561 | +4,561 | $113.01 |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 14,044 | -14,044 | $194.95 |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 4,633 | +4,633 | $125.35 |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 4,633 | -4,633 | — |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 4,561 | -4,561 | — |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 3,786 | +4,850 | $117.24 |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 3,786 | -14,044 | $194.95 |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 0 | -4,850 | — |
| GUSTAVSON JEFF B | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 8,839 | -4,561 | — |
| Wirth Michael K | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 5,547 | -5,547 | $187.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
20,585,159 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 20,250,198 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
44.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology