Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$57.25
▲ $0.68 (+1.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:31 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$56.83B
Day Range
$56.06 - $57.55
52-Week Range
$43.92 - $70.41
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$54.42
Resistance
$66.09
BKR is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+21.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): -0.3%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
88/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
93/100
Analog Quality
+5.0%
Median 40D Outcome
43/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+5.2% … +14.8%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
47%
-10.5% … -2.8%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.5%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
8 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.5% | -1.4% … +6.9% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 67% (42%–85%) | +5.9% | -0.6% … +9.7% | +0.4% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.5% | -3.3% … +9.1% | +0.7% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +5.0% | -10.6% … +17.0% | +1.9% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +5.9% | -7.7% … +13.4% | +2.4% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-17 | 88/100 | Downtrend | -6.3% | +7.3% |
| 2020-01-24 | 88/100 | Downtrend | -14.8% | -44.2% |
| 2026-06-23 | 84/100 | Consolidation | -3.5% | -3.6% |
| 2025-03-06 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -2.5% | -10.9% |
| 2025-12-19 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +19.9% | +35.8% |
| 2026-03-16 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +11.4% | +14.2% |
| 2018-10-17 | 80/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -24.8% | -25.2% |
| 2021-11-26 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +6.8% | +26.0% |
| 2018-09-07 | 78/100 | Downtrend | +1.5% | -26.0% |
| 2018-07-20 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -3.1% | -4.1% |
| 2024-09-11 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +14.2% | +29.1% |
| 2024-06-14 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +16.8% | +5.9% |
| 2023-12-08 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -1.9% | -4.4% |
| 2024-02-02 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +1.5% | +12.5% |
| 2025-10-16 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +6.4% | +9.7% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
67
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
67
$64.19
Now
49
$57.25
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
38
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
16
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
61
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING BKR...
Recent coverage of Baker Hughes has centered on its active role in a strengthening U.S. energy market: the company released data showing the U.S. oil‑and‑gas rig count rising to 595, and analysts note that higher WTI prices could boost demand for its drilling and offshore services. It also secured a large LNG compression and liquefaction order for Venture Global’s Plaquemines project, expanding its natural‑gas portfolio, while its stock is highlighted as oversold but bullish‑rated.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Baker Hughes. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
33
Fundamentals
61
Technical
16
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **herding** dominates as BKR’s modest gain (+0.7%) aligns with peer movement (+1.0%), reflecting passive alignment rather than conviction. Confirmation bias and anchoring (scores 16 and 39) indicate traders may overemphasize narrative gaps (+12) and resist selling near resistance (3.1% below). The absence of panic or euphoria (scores 3 and 13) implies a cautious, consensus-driven environment. The key question: *Will traders break from the herd if momentum or sentiment shifts?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 09:22 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"new data that Baker Hughes published on Friday"
"Baker Hughes (BKR) Lands Multi-Year Contract with Pakistan’s OGDC"
"Energy stocks were falling pre-bell Friday"
"the rig count in the Permian Basin was up one this week"
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that the stock is seen very positively by Nelson (score 100), who views it as oversold and thus favorably positioned in the cycle, while Livermore (score 15) flags a negative trend that runs counter to his core rule of trading with the trend. Mid‑range scores from Graham, Schwager, Marks and several others produce mixed or moderate verdicts, highlighting adequate business quality but concerns about valuation, crowd sentiment, or already‑priced expectations. Longer‑term growth‑oriented thinkers like Smith (69) and Lynch (53) see buy‑and‑hold or growth potential, yet Fisher (35) and Veblen (34) deem the company lacking the quality or growth signature they require. The efficient‑market view (Bogle/Malkiel, score 43) and Fisher’s assessment converge on a weak case for outperformance, illustrating how differing methodological emphases lead to a spectrum of conclusions.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 62
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 59
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 56
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 53
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 48
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 34
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
9.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
13.7%
ROA
6.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$3.71B
Total Debt
$689.00M
Current Ratio
1.36
Debt/Equity
0.04
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.8.2026 | $0.230 |
| 5.5.2026 | $0.230 |
| 4.5.2026 | $0.230 |
| 17.2.2026 | $0.230 |
| 16.2.2026 | $0.230 |
| 4.11.2025 | $0.230 |
| 3.11.2025 | $0.230 |
| 5.8.2025 | $0.230 |
| 4.8.2025 | $0.230 |
| 6.5.2025 | $0.230 |
| 5.5.2025 | $0.230 |
| 11.2.2025 | $0.230 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 4 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Baker Hughes (BKR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BKR currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
BKR's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.04; Debt/equity: 0.04.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): -0.3%; Net income growth: -13.1%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — BKR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gatti Amerino | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2026 | 3,860 | -3,860 | $63.64 |
| Gatti Amerino | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 9,807 | -9,807 | — |
| Gatti Amerino | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 9,807 | +9,807 | — |
| BORRAS MARIA C | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 72,000 | -72,000 | $55.05 |
| BORRAS MARIA C | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 20,035 | -72,000 | $55.05 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 99,911 | -99,911 | — |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 181,411 | -181,411 | $58.43 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 99,911 | +99,911 | $35.55 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 884,855 | +99,911 | $35.55 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 703,444 | -181,411 | $58.43 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 0 | -99,911 | — |
| Moghal Ahmed Farhan | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 20,000 | -20,000 | $62.38 |
| Moghal Ahmed Farhan | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 3,392 | -3,392 | $62.38 |
| Moghal Ahmed Farhan | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 20,980 | -20,000 | $62.38 |
| Moghal Ahmed Farhan | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 0 | -3,392 | $62.38 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 99,911 | -99,911 | — |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 181,411 | -181,411 | $63.36 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 99,911 | +99,911 | $35.55 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 966,355 | +99,911 | $35.55 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 784,944 | -181,411 | $63.36 |
| Simonelli Lorenzo | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.6.2026 | 99,911 | -99,911 | — |
| Charlton Rebecca L | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 5,088 | -5,088 | $64.22 |
| Charlton Rebecca L | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 15,997 | -5,088 | $64.22 |
| Charlton Rebecca L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 11,651 | +11,651 | — |
| Charlton Rebecca L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 11,651 | -11,651 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
26,778,997 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 24,573,989 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
39.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 31.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology