Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$68.78
▼ $3.07 (-4.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:24 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$198.81M
Day Range
$68.55 - $72.93
52-Week Range
$11.95 - $73.07
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$21.43
Resistance
$73.07
EDRY is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+429.1% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 10/15 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 7.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
EuryDry (EDRY) exhibits a strong technical foundation with an investor score of 80 and a **STRONG** rating, driven primarily by its bullish momentum and favorable positioning relative to key moving averages. The stock holds above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, reinforcing its uptrend, while the MACD histogram confirms accelerating upward momentum. However, technical indicators like the RSI (73.2) and %K (100.0) signal overbought conditions, suggesting potential short-term consolidation or pullback risk. The high volatility (ATR: 7.2% of price) and elevated ADX (78.1) further indicate a strong but potentially volatile trend, where sharp reversals could occur. Despite these concerns, the stock’s 161.6% gain over the past three months relative to its benchmark underscores its recent outperformance, though the risk category’s low score (42) highlights significant volatility and downside potential based on the Calmar ratio (0.89) and historical drawdowns (67.8% max loss).
The stock is firmly above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram indicating strong upward momentum. However, RSI (73.2) and %K (100.0) signal overbought conditions, while the ADX (78.1) confirms a dominant trend with high volatility (ATR: 7.2%).
This suggests a robust uptrend but also highlights the risk of overbought corrections or volatility-driven pullbacks.
All recent news mentions are overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing fleet expansion plans and strong August price performance, with repeated references to EDRY’s momentum and potential upside.
Positive sentiment and strategic initiatives could drive sustained investor interest and further price appreciation.
The ATR (7.2%) and Calmar ratio (0.89) indicate high volatility and a historically significant downside risk (67.8% max drawdown), despite recent gains.
This underscores the need for caution, as the stock’s volatility and past drawdowns could pose material risks to investors.
StockIQ conclusion
EuryDry (EDRY) demonstrates a compelling technical profile with strong momentum and positive news sentiment, supported by a 161.6% outperformance over three months. However, overbought conditions, high volatility, and significant historical drawdown risk (67.8%) create notable concerns. While the stock’s current trajectory appears robust, investors should remain vigilant to potential pullbacks or external shocks that could disrupt its upward momentum. The balance between strong fundamentals and elevated risk underscores the need for cautious positioning.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
82
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $68.78
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $68.78
Evidence: 10 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $68.78
Evidence: -4.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $68.78
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $68.78
Evidence: 10 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $68.78
Evidence: attention score 67/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $69.42
Evidence: -3.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $71.85
Evidence: +4.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $71.85
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $71.85
Evidence: 10 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $71.85
Evidence: +7.7pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $71.85
Evidence: +4.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $69.28
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $69.28
Evidence: 10 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $69.28
Evidence: +3.9pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $69.28
Evidence: +7.7pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $69.28
Evidence: attention score 97/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $69.28
Evidence: +3.7pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $69.28
Evidence: attention score 62/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $67.30
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
82
$53.69
Now
82
$68.78
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
83
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
🕵️ What the Detective found on EDRY
Detective Score 76/100 · 3 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
3 signals are currently converging on EDRY at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
What this means now: The stock moved a lot more (or less) today than the average of other stocks in its sector — it stands out relative to its peers.
Why it matters: A move that meaningfully outpaces its sector suggests something company-specific, not just a sector-wide trend.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of EuroDry Ltd. centers on its strong financial performance and market momentum. The company announced its Q2 2026 earnings, highlighted robust earnings expectations, expanding fleet and rising dry‑bulk freight rates, and was praised for high net‑profit margins and EPS growth. It launched a $20 million at‑the‑market share offering and its senior executives are slated to speak at the 18th Annual Capital Link New York Maritime Forum, underscoring investor interest and industry visibility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about EuroDry Ltd. - Common. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
80
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Investors appear highly excited (80), but evidence of strong fundamental conviction is comparatively weak (50).
Psychology
90
Fundamentals
—
Technical
83
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+198%
Market Narrative
88
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+38
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
EDRY’s market behavior suggests a dominant euphoric state, where extreme momentum (+30.2% ROC), overvaluation (+126% above 200-day avg), and perfect sentiment (100/100) align with speculative overconfidence. The narrative-reality gap (38) implies traders are detached from fundamentals, while anchoring near resistance (2.9%) hints at a potential ceiling. FOMO and herd behavior remain secondary, with the latter triggered by relative underperformance today. The key question: will traders sustain euphoria despite overbought conditions, or will anchoring near resistance trigger profit-taking?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:54 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"EuroDry (EDRY) has surged nearly 350% over the past year"
"renewing its fleet with four eco-design newbuildings, targeting 15 vessels and 1.05 million dwt of capacity after 2028 deliveries"
"EDRY, RCMT, ASMB, DCTH and NESR show strong recent price momentum after a strong August"
"Analysts rate EDRY as 'Strong Buy'"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 21D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Livermore's documented principles, the model estimates a strong positive trend for EDRY, reflected in his high score of 87, while Schwager and the efficient‑market view sit near the midpoint (scores of 56 and 54) indicating no clear edge. Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot and Graham‑Enterprising each return a neutral 50 because their frameworks require more balance‑sheet, valuation or growth data than is currently available, so they cannot form a decisive opinion. In contrast, Loeb, Marks (both cycle and overall), Veblen, Mackay, Nelson and Housel assign low scores (ranging from 26 down to 0), flagging capital risk, late‑cycle caution, growth pursued for its own sake, crowd delusion, overbought conditions and volatility. This divergence shows how a technical‑driven methodology can be optimistic while value‑oriented, cycle‑aware and behavioral approaches remain cautious or neutral.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 87
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 56
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 19
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 5
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 3
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 3 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 4 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for EuroDry Ltd. - Common (EDRY) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for EDRY specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
EDRY's technical score is 83/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 7.1% of price; RSI 72.0 — approaching overbought territory; %K 82.9 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for EDRY.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 34,020 | -950 | $52.12 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 75,663 | -250 | $52.12 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 34,970 | -1,000 | $48.82 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 33,020 | -1,000 | $51.40 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $48.82 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 250 | -250 | $52.12 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 950 | -950 | $52.12 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $51.40 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 250 | -250 | $52.12 |
| Karmiri Stefania | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 350 | +350 | $45.35 |
| Karmiri Stefania | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 500 | +350 | $45.35 |
| Pariaros Symeon | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 2,676 | -2,676 | $45.80 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 250 | -250 | $44.56 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 250 | -250 | $44.56 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 75,913 | -250 | $44.56 |
| Pariaros Symeon | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,900 | -2,676 | $45.80 |
| Pariaros Symeon | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 2,700 | -2,700 | $42.00 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 300 | -300 | $39.50 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 300 | -300 | $39.50 |
| Pariaros Symeon | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 1,900 | -1,900 | $39.98 |
| Pariaros Symeon | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 7,276 | -1,900 | $39.98 |
| Karmiri Stefania | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $38.50 |
| Karmiri Stefania | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 850 | -400 | $38.50 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 250 | -250 | $37.80 |
| Pittas Aristeidis P | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 250 | -250 | $37.80 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
136,921 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,188 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology