Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$100.92
▲ $0.10 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:48 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$99.87 - $102.33
52-Week Range
$47.18 - $103.16
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$69.26
Resistance
$103.16
TNK is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+84.4% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
RSI
RSI 71.3 — approaching overbought territory
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
TNK’s overall investor score of 87 reflects a robust technical and news-driven performance, though its risk profile introduces notable volatility considerations. The technical category (score: 92) highlights a strong upward momentum, with the stock trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 66.9—indicating healthy upward momentum. However, the %K reading at 90.8 suggests the stock is overbought, which could signal a potential near-term pullback. The news category (score: 92) underscores positive sentiment tied to geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, which has driven shipping and tanker stocks higher, while recent technical breakouts and short-term gains reinforce investor confidence. Yet, the risk category (score: 50) reveals significant volatility, with an ATR of 3.5% of the stock price and a Sharpe ratio of 0.64, indicating a high potential for sharp swings—historically, the stock has seen a 34.2% annualized return but also a maximum drawdown of 53.2%.
The stock is trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 66.9, but it is currently overbought (%K at 90.8).
This suggests strong upward momentum with potential for continued gains, though overbought conditions may indicate a near-term correction.
Recent news highlights geopolitical uncertainty in the Strait of Hormuz as a driver for shipping stocks, including TNK, alongside technical breakouts and short-term gains.
Positive sentiment around geopolitical risks and technical momentum supports investor optimism and stock performance.
The stock exhibits high volatility (ATR: 3.5% of price) and a low Sharpe ratio (0.64), with a historical maximum drawdown of 53.2%.
This volatility suggests significant price swings, which could pose challenges for risk-averse investors.
StockIQ conclusion
TNK demonstrates strong technical and news-driven fundamentals, supported by positive momentum and geopolitical tailwinds, but its high volatility and overbought conditions introduce notable risks. While the stock’s historical performance suggests potential for significant gains, the volatility and uncertainty around geopolitical factors necessitate cautious consideration. Investors should monitor technical indicators and geopolitical developments closely to assess evolving risk-reward dynamics.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
83
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $100.92
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $100.92
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $100.92
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $100.92
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $100.82
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $100.82
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $100.63
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $100.63
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $102.30
Evidence: +3.8pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $99.25
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $99.25
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $100.30
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $100.30
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $99.35
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $99.35
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $100.83
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $100.83
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $100.83
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $100.83
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $98.25
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
82
$90.03
Now
83
$100.92
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
82
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
🕵️ What the Detective found on TNK
Detective Score 70/100 · 2 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
2 signals are currently converging on TNK at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Teekay Tankers Ltd. has centered on its stock performance amid geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, where uncertainty over oil shipments has heightened demand for tanker services. The company’s shares have surged to multi-year highs, driven by market volatility and capacity constraints in shipping. Analysts also discuss whether Teekay Tankers is undervalued, while technical indicators like breaking above the 20-day moving average and a 6.92% weekly gain reflect investor momentum. The focus remains on geopolitical risks and market reactions to shipping disruptions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Teekay Tankers Ltd.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
62
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
—
Technical
82
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+36%
Market Narrative
81
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+31
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
TNK’s psychology is dominated by anchoring (56), where traders appear fixated on the 2.2% resistance gap, despite euphoric sentiment (39) from extreme bullishness and outperformance relative to its 200-day baseline. The narrative-reality gap (16) hints at overoptimism, as traders may overvalue recent momentum (+1.4% ROC) without accounting for potential resistance. The absence of panic or herding suggests confidence remains intact, though the key question is whether traders will break the resistance or adjust expectations if it holds. Neutral volume (0.97x) and moderate RSI (64) imply no immediate urgency, but the extreme sentiment (100/100) could amplify volatility if resistance is tested.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:39 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Shipping Stocks Hit Multi-Year Highs as Middle East Turmoil Tightens Capacity"
"Teekay Tankers (TNK) Recently Broke Out Above the 20-Day Moving Average"
"Wall Street analysts' overly optimistic recommendations cast doubt on the effectiveness of this highly sought-after metric. So, is the stock worth buying?"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 20D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 75/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Livermore’s documented principles, the model estimates a positive price‑action trend that yields a relatively high score of 75, whereas Marks, Veblen, Mackay and Nelson—all of whom focus on valuation risk, cycle positioning and crowd psychology—assign low scores ranging from 24 down to 4, flagging the stock as risky or overbought. The efficient‑market view (Malkiel & Bogle) lands in the middle with a score of 57, reflecting a mixed case where the evidence for out‑performing an index is weak. Several classic value‑oriented frameworks (Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot) default to neutral 50 scores because the required balance‑sheet, growth or fundamentals data are unavailable, producing no decisive read. Overall, the divergence stems from Livermore’s momentum focus contrasting with risk‑averse, cycle‑sensitive and crowd‑behavior lenses that highlight caution.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 75
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 57
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 44
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 24
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 14
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 4
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.8.2026 | $0.250 |
| 26.5.2026 | $1.250 |
| 25.5.2026 | $1.250 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.250 |
| 1.3.2026 | $0.250 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.250 |
| 10.8.2025 | $0.250 |
| 19.5.2025 | $1.250 |
| 18.5.2025 | $1.250 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.250 |
| 2.3.2025 | $0.250 |
| 12.11.2024 | $0.250 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 10 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for TNK specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
TNK's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: RSI 71.3 — approaching overbought territory; %K 86.3 — overbought.
Yes — TNK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speers Brody | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 93.423 | +93.423 | — |
| Kapoor Rohit (RK2) | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 78.808 | +78.808 | — |
| Seidelin Mikkel | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 99.642 | +99.642 | — |
| Schellenberg David | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 23.696 | +23.696 | — |
| Hvid Kenneth | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 388.272 | +388.272 | — |
| Antturi Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 17.349 | +17.349 | — |
| Schellenberg David | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 141 | +24 | — |
| Antturi Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 94 | +17 | — |
| Hvid Kenneth | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 2,326 | +388 | — |
| Seidelin Mikkel | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 651 | +100 | — |
| Kapoor Rohit (RK2) | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 554 | +79 | — |
| Speers Brody | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 616 | +93 | — |
| Kapoor Rohit (RK2) | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 6,375 | -6,375 | $89.28 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 741 | -741 | $90.00 |
| Krediet Rudolph | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 1,883 | +1,883 | $71.66 |
| Schellenberg David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.6.2026 | 7,031 | -7,031 | $8.00 |
| Schellenberg David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.6.2026 | 7,031 | +7,031 | $8.00 |
| Schellenberg David | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 7,031 | -7,031 | $71.53 |
| Locke Simon Heidi | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 1,883 | +1,883 | $71.66 |
| Semple Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 1,883 | +1,883 | $71.66 |
| Schellenberg David | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 1,883 | +1,883 | — |
| Antturi Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 1,883 | +1,883 | — |
| Karlshoej Poul Ulrich | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 1,883 | +1,883 | $71.66 |
| Seidelin Mikkel | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 4,596 | +4,596 | — |
| Kapoor Rohit (RK2) | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 1,395 | +1,395 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
765,596 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 850,911 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology