Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$51.42
▼ $2.61 (-4.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:23 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$11.45B
Day Range
$50.36 - $51.81
52-Week Range
$20.47 - $54.91
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.11.2026
Support
$35.71
Resistance
$54.91
FRO is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+115.4% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 10/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Parabolic SAR
Price is below the SAR point — downtrend
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
FRO exhibits a robust overall score of 85, driven primarily by strong technical indicators and a near-perfect news sentiment score. The technical analysis highlights a clear upward momentum, with the stock trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 68.8, signaling healthy upward momentum. However, the %K reading of 84.4 indicates the stock is overbought, which could introduce short-term volatility or a pullback. The news category is exceptionally strong, with multiple positive mentions of shipping and oil-related stocks—particularly those tied to geopolitical disruptions and sectoral momentum—outweighing a single negative headline. Meanwhile, the risk category remains a notable concern, as the ATR of 3.3% suggests moderate volatility, while the Sharpe ratio of 0.73 and historical volatility (40.7% annualized return with a 56.1% max drawdown) indicate a higher-risk profile, particularly for investors sensitive to volatility or drawdowns.
The stock trades above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 68.8, indicating strong upward momentum. However, the %K reading of 84.4 suggests the stock is overbought, which may signal potential short-term volatility.
Technical strength suggests sustained bullish momentum, but overbought conditions could lead to near-term corrections or profit-taking.
The news sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with multiple references to shipping and oil sector gains—particularly tied to geopolitical disruptions and sectoral momentum—outweighing a single negative headline.
Positive news sentiment aligns with the stock’s technical strength, reinforcing bullish narratives and potential for continued sectoral tailwinds.
The ATR of 3.3% indicates moderate volatility, while the Sharpe ratio of 0.73 and historical volatility (40.7% annualized return with a 56.1% max drawdown) highlight a higher-risk profile with significant drawdown potential.
The risk profile suggests volatility and potential for substantial losses, which may deter conservative investors or those with low risk tolerance.
StockIQ conclusion
FRO demonstrates a compelling investment profile with strong technical momentum, overwhelmingly positive news sentiment, and relative outperformance. However, the stock’s overbought condition and elevated risk metrics—particularly historical volatility and drawdown potential—highlight potential near-term volatility and sector-specific risks. While the current data supports a cautiously optimistic outlook, investors should monitor geopolitical developments and technical corrections to assess long-term viability.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
85
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $51.42
Evidence: attention score 62/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $51.42
Evidence: 1.6x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $51.42
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $51.42
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $51.42
Evidence: -4.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $51.42
Evidence: attention score 84/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $51.42
Evidence: 1.5x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $51.42
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $51.42
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $51.42
Evidence: -4.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $50.57
Evidence: attention score 85/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $50.81
Evidence: -5.7pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $51.65
Evidence: -4.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $54.03
Evidence: 1.6x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $54.03
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $54.03
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $54.03
Evidence: +5.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $53.67
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $53.67
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $53.67
Evidence: +5.2pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 27, 2026
Then
83
$41.20
Now
85
$51.42
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
86
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
🕵️ What the Detective found on FRO
Detective Score 74/100 · 4 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean negative.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
4 signals are currently converging on FRO at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: Today's trading volume is significantly above the stock's normal average — a lot more buyers and sellers active in it than usual.
Why it matters: May indicate a significant change in trading activity, but doesn't allow a confident conclusion about price direction.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
What this means now: The stock moved a lot more (or less) today than the average of other stocks in its sector — it stands out relative to its peers.
Why it matters: A move that meaningfully outpaces its sector suggests something company-specific, not just a sector-wide trend.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Frontline Plc** has highlighted its strong performance amid geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, particularly focusing on rising oil prices and heightened shipping demand. Analysts have praised the company for its surging Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) spot rates, low operational costs, robust dividend yield (over 20%), and expanding fleet, positioning it as a top beneficiary of the Strait of Hormuz disruption and broader oil market volatility. The stock has been singled out as a "Strong Buy" in investment analyses.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Frontline Plc. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
64
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
—
Technical
86
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+26%
Market Narrative
83
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+33
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests investors are fixated on a near-term resistance level (1.3% away), while euphoric momentum and peer outperformance fuel herd-like buying. The extreme positive sentiment and overbought RSI imply emotional overconfidence in recent gains. The key open question is whether the anchoring bias will hold or if euphoria-driven buying pushes the stock beyond resistance, creating a new reference point. The narrative gap (72 vs. 50) hints at a disconnect between optimism and fundamentals, which may amplify anchoring effects if price action diverges from expectations.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 11:38 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Shipping Stocks Hit Multi-Year Highs as Middle East Turmoil Tightens Capacity"
"Frontline posted the best quarter in company history, with net income of $659 million"
"Evercore ISI Group raises Frontline price target to $41"
"surging VLCC spot rates, low breakeven, 20%+ dividend yield and fleet growth"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 20D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological contrasts. Jesse Livermore’s high score (72) and positive trend verdict suggest he’d see a clear upward price momentum, aligning with his focus on market psychology and technical patterns. In contrast, most methodologies—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and even the efficient-market camp—return neutral scores (50) due to insufficient data, signaling they’d lack the fundamental or quantitative confidence to commit. Meanwhile, the lowest scores (from Marks, Mackay, and Nelson) flag red flags like valuation risks, late-cycle positioning, or speculative crowd behavior, while Housel’s volatility warning hints at emotional pitfalls. The divergence underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in speculative momentum (Livermore) or whether its risks outweigh its potential (Marks, Mackay).
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 87
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 61
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 25
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 23
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 16
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 14
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 14
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.9.2026 | $3.410 |
| 12.6.2026 | $1.550 |
| 11.6.2026 | $1.550 |
| 12.3.2026 | $1.030 |
| 11.3.2026 | $1.030 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.180 |
| 11.6.2025 | $0.180 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.200 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.200 |
| 11.12.2024 | $0.340 |
| 10.12.2024 | $0.340 |
| 13.9.2024 | $0.620 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Frontline Plc (FRO) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for FRO specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
FRO's technical score is 86/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — FRO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,659,307 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,679,685 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology