Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$44.87
▼ $0.59 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:38 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$15.72B
Day Range
$44.64 - $45.40
52-Week Range
$21.63 - $47.44
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$32.93
Resistance
$47.44
APA is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+87.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 75.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.82
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
83/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+8.6%
Median 40D Outcome
13/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+9.9% … +21.9%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.8% … -0.8%
🔴 Bearish
53%
-15.4% … -4.1%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -1.7%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
10 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
3 occurrence(s) · 33% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.5% | -3.6% … +3.6% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 33% (15%–58%) | -0.7% | -7.5% … +5.4% | +0.4% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.7% | -8.6% … +12.1% | +0.7% |
| 40D | 73% (48%–89%) | +8.6% | -0.9% … +23.5% | +1.3% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.5% | -18.4% … +30.4% | +0.1% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-25 | 83/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +48.4% | +37.7% |
| 2022-04-07 | 83/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +7.6% | -21.9% |
| 2021-06-15 | 83/100 | Uptrend | -16.7% | -17.2% |
| 2018-08-07 | 83/100 | Uptrend | -5.3% | -18.4% |
| 2026-02-03 | 82/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +17.5% | +53.9% |
| 2022-02-25 | 82/100 | Uptrend | +23.3% | +31.1% |
| 2018-09-26 | 82/100 | Uptrend | -19.6% | -43.8% |
| 2025-10-08 | 81/100 | Uptrend | -12.0% | -0.5% |
| 2025-12-12 | 80/100 | Uptrend | -0.8% | +29.6% |
| 2026-01-16 | 80/100 | Uptrend | +6.1% | +42.0% |
| 2022-11-22 | 79/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -2.3% | -20.3% |
| 2025-11-17 | 79/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -1.7% | +14.5% |
| 2022-02-10 | 79/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +16.7% | +12.2% |
| 2023-09-07 | 79/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -15.0% | -18.4% |
| 2025-09-22 | 77/100 | Uptrend | -4.7% | +1.5% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
67
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $45.24
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 56)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
29d ago · $43.39
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
29d ago · $43.39
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $44.27
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $44.27
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $42.37
Evidence: +4.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
32d ago · $41.83
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $41.83
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
70
$41.93
Now
67
$44.87
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
78
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
60
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING APA...
Recent media coverage of APA Corporation has primarily centered on its stock performance and analyst reactions following its recent earnings report. The company’s shares have surged **20.9%** since the last earnings announcement, sparking speculation about future gains. Analysts from firms like Raymond James and Wells Fargo have maintained **positive outlooks**, with raised price targets ($54 and $50, respectively), though one firm issued a **neutral rating**. Broader market trends, including rising crude oil prices, may also influence investor sentiment. No direct operational or strategic developments for APA were highlighted in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about APA Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
40
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
60
Technical
78
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+36%
Market Narrative
66
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
+14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
APA’s psychology profile suggests a dominant *herding* dynamic, where investors align with peer sector movements rather than APA’s unique fundamentals. The narrative-reality gap (-10) hints at a disconnect between market expectations and actual performance, but the absence of extreme states (e.g., panic or euphoria) implies cautious, trend-following behavior. Key open questions revolve around whether APA’s underperformance is temporary or structural, and if herding will persist or shift as sector conditions evolve. The neutral volume and volatility further reinforce a lack of urgency in decision-making.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:16 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Raymond James analyst John Freeman maintains APA with an Outperform and raises the price target from $50 to $54"
"APA (APA) reported earnings 30 days ago and is up 20.9% since then"
"Seaport Global analyst Vin Lovaglio initiates coverage on APA with a Neutral rating"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for APA reflects a clash between growth-focused and value-driven methodologies. Peter Lynch and Edgar Lawrence Smith’s near-perfect scores highlight their enthusiasm for long-term growth potential, with Lynch emphasizing underpriced upside and Smith endorsing it as a ‘buy-and-hold’ candidate. Meanwhile, value-oriented frameworks like Benjamin Graham’s strict criteria and the Enterprising Investor version dismiss it outright, scoring poorly due to perceived overvaluation or lack of margin of safety. Mid-tier scores from Howard Marks and Morgan Housel suggest cautious optimism—acknowledging strengths but flagging potential overpricing or operational risks, while behavioral and market-cycle models (Veblen, Marks-cycle) lean positive but tempered. The contrast underscores how growth investors prioritize future potential, while value purists demand immediate discounts or defensive traits absent here.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 67
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 55
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 55
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 54
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 47
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 43
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 40
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 20
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
23.5%
ROA
8.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.99
Cash
$516.00M
Total Debt
$213.00M
Current Ratio
0.82
Debt/Equity
0.03
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 22.7.2026 | $0.250 |
| 21.7.2026 | $0.250 |
| 22.4.2026 | $0.250 |
| 21.4.2026 | $0.250 |
| 22.1.2026 | $0.250 |
| 21.1.2026 | $0.250 |
| 22.10.2025 | $0.250 |
| 21.10.2025 | $0.250 |
| 22.7.2025 | $0.250 |
| 21.7.2025 | $0.250 |
| 22.4.2025 | $0.250 |
| 21.4.2025 | $0.250 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$16.97
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$16.97
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 5 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
APA Corporation (APA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 67/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
APA currently scores 67/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
APA's technical score is 78/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 75.8%; Net income growth: 78.4%; Return on equity (ROE): 23.5% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.82; Calmar: 0.03 (3y annualized return 2.1% / max drawdown 67.6%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — APA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bay Annell R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,535 | +1,535 | — |
| Ellis Juliet S | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,535 | +1,535 | — |
| Fisher Kenneth M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,535 | +1,535 | — |
| Joung Chansoo | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,535 | +1,535 | — |
| STOVER DAVID L | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,535 | +1,535 | — |
| Weaving Anya | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,535 | +1,535 | — |
| Ragauss Peter A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,535 | +1,535 | — |
| McKay Lamar | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,302 | +2,302 | — |
| Hooper Charles W | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 1,535 | +1,535 | — |
| STOVER DAVID L | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 31,396 | +1,535 | — |
| Joung Chansoo | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 244,742 | +1,535 | — |
| Ragauss Peter A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 101,859 | +1,535 | — |
| Fisher Kenneth M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 13,977 | +1,535 | — |
| Bay Annell R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 103,725 | +1,535 | — |
| Ellis Juliet S | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 89,323 | +1,535 | — |
| McKay Lamar | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 55,702 | +2,302 | — |
| Hooper Charles W | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 31,689 | +1,535 | — |
| Weaving Anya | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 18,597 | +1,535 | — |
| Henderson Tracey K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| Henderson Tracey K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 26.5.2026 | 1,968 | -1,968 | $37.50 |
| Henderson Tracey K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | — |
| Henderson Tracey K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 55,726 | +5,000 | — |
| Henderson Tracey K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 26.5.2026 | 53,758 | -1,968 | $37.50 |
| Henderson Tracey K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 26.5.2026 | 57,968 | -5,000 | — |
| Maddox Mark D | I | 20.5.2026 | 15,500 | +15,500 | $39.32 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
24,205,148 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 30,088,863 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology