Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$78.73
▼ $0.15 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 11:49 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$78.34 - $79.41
52-Week Range
$54.24 - $80.90
Beta
—
Next Earnings
17.11.2026
Support
$68.42
Resistance
$80.90
JOYY is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+24.0% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Death Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
JOYY exhibits a balanced yet nuanced profile, with its **investorScore of 78** and **STRONG rating** driven primarily by robust technical indicators and overwhelmingly positive news sentiment. The technical category (score: 75) highlights a bullish setup, as the stock trades above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, supported by a **positive MACD histogram** and an **RSI of 57.2**, indicating healthy upward momentum. However, the **Parabolic SAR (SAR) below price** and declining volume despite the price rise suggest potential weakening institutional interest or profit-taking pressure. News sentiment (score: 100) is uniformly positive, with multiple analyst reports emphasizing growth engines and undervaluation, though the **Q2 2026 earnings call transcript** introduces a minor cautionary note. Risk (score: 50) is moderated by a **low ATR of 2.9%** (indicating stable volatility) but tempered by a **Clarke Ratio of 0.86**, reflecting a historically volatile trajectory with a **33.7% max drawdown** over three years—highlighting potential downside risk if momentum reverses.
The stock trades above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and RSI of 57.2 signaling upward momentum, though the Parabolic SAR suggests a potential downward reversal pressure.
These technical signals are critical for assessing short-to-medium-term trend strength and potential entry/exit points for traders.
All recent analyst reports are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting growth opportunities and undervaluation, though the Q2 earnings call transcript contains a single negative note.
Positive news sentiment can drive investor confidence and sustained buying pressure, while even minor negative commentary may introduce caution.
The stock exhibits low volatility (ATR: 2.9%) but carries a high historical drawdown risk (max 33.7% over three years), as indicated by the Clarke Ratio of 0.86.
Low volatility suggests stability, but the high drawdown risk underscores the need for careful risk management, especially in volatile sectors like livestreaming.
StockIQ conclusion
JOYY demonstrates a compelling blend of technical strength and positive news sentiment, supported by recent relative outperformance. However, technical divergences (e.g., SAR, declining volume) and inherent volatility risks temper the overall outlook. The stock’s score reflects its current attractiveness but requires vigilance for potential downside triggers, particularly in a sector prone to rapid shifts in consumer behavior and competition.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
76
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $78.88
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $78.88
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $78.76
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $77.28
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $77.18
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $77.41
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $77.26
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $77.26
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
17d ago · $74.81
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
18d ago · $74.73
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
19d ago · $74.64
Evidence: 1.9x recent average volume
What happened after
19d ago · $74.64
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 28, 2026
Then
82
$74.83
Now
76
$78.73
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
71
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of JOYY Inc. has centered on its strong Q2 2026 performance, with revenue climbing 16.3% year‑over‑year to $590.8 million and non‑GAAP operating income rising about 28% to roughly $49 million. The company highlighted rapid growth in its deep‑learning advertising platform (up 53%), raised full‑year operating‑income guidance by around 20%, and emphasized a robust $3.06 billion cash position while building two new growth engines.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about JOYY Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 16 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
42
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
—
Technical
71
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+20%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
JOYY’s psychology is fragmented, with **euphoria** (28) and **FOMO** (24) competing for dominance despite weak momentum. The 13.8% premium to the 200-day average and perfect sentiment align with detached optimism, while FOMO’s volume spike suggests speculative interest. The narrative gap (64 vs. 50) hints at overestimation of fundamentals. Key question: Is euphoria masking a disconnect between price and intrinsic value, or is FOMO driving short-term speculative flows? The lack of herding or anchoring suggests no clear behavioral anchor, leaving room for volatility.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:43 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Net revenue climbed 16.3% year over year to $590.8 million"
"non-GAAP operating income jumped 28.2% to $49.1 million"
"deep-learning ad platform revenues grow 53%"
"raises full-year operating income guidance to ~20% growth"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 18D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 70/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 2/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here reveal a stark divide between those with *any* signal at all and those that see this stock as a no-go. On one end, **Edgar Lawrence Smith (100)** and **Jesse Livermore (61)** at least have some data to work with—Smith’s lack of dividend/growth data leaves him unable to act, while Livermore’s neutral score suggests he’d avoid it due to unclear trends. Meanwhile, **Charles Mackay (53)** and **Samuel Nelson (54)** detect early signs of speculative excitement or mid-cycle momentum, hinting at a potential crowd-driven rally. However, the majority—including **Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, and even Veblen (all 50)**—are deadlocked in indecision, either due to insufficient data or conflicting signals, with Veblen uniquely questioning whether growth will translate into profit. On the other end, **Howard Marks (39), Morgan Housel (38), and Howard Marks (Market Cycle, 28)** paint a far more cautionary picture, flagging volatility, risk, and late-cycle risks that would make them steer clear entirely.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 70
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 54
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 47
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 36
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 28
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 2
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.6.2026 | $1.500 |
| 28.6.2026 | $1.500 |
| 22.4.2026 | $1.380 |
| 21.4.2026 | $1.380 |
| 2.1.2026 | $0.970 |
| 1.1.2026 | $0.970 |
| 22.9.2025 | $0.950 |
| 21.9.2025 | $0.950 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.940 |
| 22.6.2025 | $0.940 |
| 17.4.2025 | $0.930 |
| 16.4.2025 | $0.930 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 16 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
TipRanks · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
PR Newswire · 26.8.2026
PR Newswire · 26.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for JOYY Inc. (JOYY) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for JOYY specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
JOYY's technical score is 71/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200; RSI 70.5 — approaching overbought territory; %K 88.9 — overbought.
Yes — JOYY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,018,563 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,082,998 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
44.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology