Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$29.13
▼ $1.42 (-4.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:24 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.26B
Day Range
$28.77 - $31.70
52-Week Range
$21.68 - $32.79
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$23.15
Resistance
$32.79
+9.6% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.3% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Radware (RDWR) earned an investor score of 81, landing in the "STRONG" rating band. The technical profile is solid, with the share price sitting above both the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 57.9 that signals healthy, yet not overbought, momentum. The stochastic %K at 76 is neutral, reinforcing a balanced short‑term stance. News sentiment is exceptionally favorable, highlighted by a H1 2026 Global Threat Report that documents a 110% surge in web DDoS attacks, underscoring rising demand for Radware’s cybersecurity solutions, while broader sector stocks such as Crowdstrike and Okta are also gaining. Risk metrics temper optimism: an ATR of 3.6% of price indicates moderate price swings, and a Calmar ratio of 0.71, paired with a 20.8% three‑year annualized return and a 29.4% maximum drawdown, points to noticeable downside exposure. The overall score reflects this blend of bullish technical momentum and sector‑driven news, offset by liquidity and volatility concerns.
Price is above the 50‑day and 200‑day averages, MACD histogram is positive, RSI is 57.9, and stochastic %K is neutral at 76.
These indicators collectively signal a prevailing uptrend with controlled momentum, reducing short‑term downside risk.
Positive coverage of a 110% jump in DDoS attacks, sector‑wide gains in cybersecurity stocks, and a neutral COO share‑sale event.
Strong sector headlines boost market sentiment and can translate into higher demand for the company’s products.
ATR equals 3.6% of price and the Calmar ratio is 0.71, reflecting a 20.8% three‑year annual return with a 29.4% max drawdown.
These figures highlight the stock’s volatility and potential for significant drawdowns, informing risk‑adjusted assessments.
StockIQ conclusion
Radware’s strong technical positioning and favorable cybersecurity news underpin its high investor score, while moderate volatility and declining volume introduce caution. The balance of bullish momentum and identified risks paints a nuanced picture that warrants close monitoring of sector developments and trading activity.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
81
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $29.13
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $29.13
Evidence: 1.8x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $29.13
Evidence: attention score 65/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $29.13
Evidence: 8 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $29.13
Evidence: attention score 70/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $30.55
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $30.55
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $31.00
Evidence: 8 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $29.45
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $29.60
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $29.77
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $29.50
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 36 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $29.50
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 15, 2026
Then
81
$29.50
Now
81
$29.13
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
84
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
17
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of Radware focuses on its Q2 2026 earnings call, where cloud‑security growth boosted recurring revenue but margins and EPS lagged. The company’s H1 2026 threat report shows a 110% surge in web DDoS attacks, while insiders—CTO Meleh David Aviv and COO Gabriel Malka—have sold significant share blocks. Overall sentiment reflects growth potential tempered by profitability concerns and executive share reductions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Radware Ltd.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
37
Fundamentals
—
Technical
84
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+7%
Market Narrative
66
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+16
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market data shows a modest price rise (+0.7% ROC) with perfect news sentiment and the price 11.7% above its 200‑day average. FOMO (32) and Euphoria (26) scores suggest some excitement, yet volume is slightly below average (0.95×) and RSI sits at 59, tempering bullishness. The 15‑point narrative‑reality gap hints at an optimism bias, raising the question whether sentiment will sustain buying pressure without stronger volume support.
Updated: 09/17/2026, 10:46 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Radware positioned as a Leader in the SPARK Matrix™: Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Mitigation, 2026 by QKS Group"
"Radware, a global leader in AI and application security and delivery solutions for multi-cloud environments"
"sales of US$82.28 million, up from US$74.11 million a year earlier, while net income fell to US$1.71 million from US$4.22 million"
"Shares of cybersecurity-related companies are trading higher amid sympathy with Crowdstrike and Okta"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 61/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that investors such as Mackay and Livermore see only modest signals—Mackay notes some crowd excitement while Livermore advises staying on the sidelines. Several value‑focused investors (Graham, Bagehot, Fisher) report that the available balance‑sheet and fundamentals data are too thin to form a reliable read, resulting in neutral or cautionary verdicts. In contrast, risk‑oriented analysts like Marks, Schwager, Loeb and Housel flag the stock’s risk profile, valuation or volatility as warning signs, giving it low scores and urging caution or avoidance. The wide spread of scores thus reflects each methodology’s different data requirements and risk tolerances, producing a generally mixed assessment of RDWR.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 61
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 48
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 28
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
MT Newswires · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
PR Newswire · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 6.8.2026
PR Newswire · 6.8.2026
Yahoo · 4.8.2026
PR Newswire · 4.8.2026
Yahoo · 3.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.8.2026
Yahoo · 2.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 2.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Radware Ltd. (RDWR) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for RDWR specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
RDWR's technical score is 84/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.3% of price; CMF 20 days: -0.15.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for RDWR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malka Gabriel | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 47,922 | -6,500 | $30.00 |
| Malka Gabriel | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 6,500 | -6,500 | $30.00 |
| Avidan Guy | Open Market Purchase | 31.7.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $25.21 |
| Avidan Guy | Open Market Purchase | 31.7.2026 | 95,800 | +2,000 | $25.21 |
| Aviv David Meleh | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | — |
| Aviv David Meleh | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 149,487 | +20,000 | — |
| Goldriech Rivkah | Open Market Sale | 9.7.2026 | 750 | -750 | $32.00 |
| Goldriech Rivkah | Open Market Sale | 9.7.2026 | 59,991 | -750 | $32.00 |
| Malka Gabriel | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 7,000 | -7,000 | $30.00 |
| Malka Gabriel | Open Market Sale | 29.5.2026 | 54,422 | -7,000 | $30.00 |
| STERN STANLEY | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
| Mazin Israel | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
| Zisapel Roy | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 201,314 | +201,314 | — |
| Pinchev Alex | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
| Zisapel Roy | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 250,946 | +250,946 | — |
| STERN STANLEY | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
| Pinchev Alex | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
| Mazin Israel | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
| Zisapel Roy | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 2,392,275 | +201,314 | — |
| Zisapel Roy | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.5.2026 | 250,946 | +250,946 | — |
| Goldriech Rivkah | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 1,375 | -1,375 | $29.50 |
| Goldriech Rivkah | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 60,741 | -1,375 | $29.50 |
| Malka Gabriel | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 3,111 | -3,111 | $29.00 |
| Malka Gabriel | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 61,422 | -3,111 | $29.00 |
| Zisapel Roy | W | 1.4.2026 | 454,272 | +454,272 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
990,210 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 901,976 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 32.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology