Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Telecommunications · ·
$8.00
▼ $0.09 (-1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:31 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$389.16M
Day Range
$7.80 - $8.05
52-Week Range
$6.12 - $11.92
Beta
—
Next Earnings
18.11.2026
Support
$7.31
Resistance
$9.05
-17.9% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.2% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
80
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $8.00
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $8.00
Evidence: 2.2x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $8.00
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $8.00
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $8.00
Evidence: 2.1x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $8.00
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $8.09
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $8.09
Evidence: 2.0x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $8.09
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $7.84
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $7.84
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $7.84
Evidence: 1.6x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $8.08
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $8.08
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $8.08
Evidence: 1.6x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $8.38
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 56 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $8.38
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $8.38
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 16, 2026
Then
84
$8.08
Now
80
$8.00
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
80
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Allot Ltd. highlights its strong financial performance in Q2 2026, with a **15% revenue surge** and **tripling of non-GAAP net income** year-over-year, driven by robust North American growth and record backlog. The company also raised its full-year guidance, emphasizing expansion in its **Security-as-a-Service (SECaaS)** business. Additionally, Allot announced leadership of a new **post-quantum communications consortium**, positioning itself as a key player in emerging cybersecurity innovations.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Allot Ltd.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
43
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
—
Technical
80
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+11%
Market Narrative
71
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+21
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **narrative-reality gap** (63 vs. 50) where positive news sentiment (100/100) drives speculative positioning, but weak momentum and peer underperformance indicate cautious herding. The dominant psychological state—**none**—points to a fragmented market where traders are neither panicking nor euphoric but anchored near support. The key open question is whether the outperformance relative to peers will sustain or if traders will abandon the stock as momentum remains negative. The lack of extreme volatility or volume suggests a measured, not impulsive, response to recent news.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:07 PM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Revenue Surges 15% as ... raises full-year guidance on strong North America growth and record backlog"
"supported by continued expansion of its Security-as-a-Service, or SECaaS, business"
"strong North America growth and record backlog"
"Allot to Chair New Consortium Focused on Post-Quantum Communications"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 18D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 64/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some seeing cautious opportunity while others flag it as a high-risk or volatile play. Charles Mackay and Samuel Armstrong Nelson both lean *slightly* positive, with scores above 65, suggesting the stock isn’t caught up in irrational exuberance and may be oversold relative to its cycle—but their verdicts lack the confidence of a full endorsement. In contrast, the majority of the models, including Graham, Fisher, and Lynch, are neutral at best due to insufficient data, while Howard Marks and the efficient-market theorists express skepticism, questioning whether the stock’s merits justify picking it over broader indices. At the other end, risk-averse voices like Loeb, Schwager, and Livermore dismiss it outright—Loeb warns of capital-threatening risks, Schwager’s disciplined approach says ‘pass,’ and Livermore’s trend-following rules outright reject it. Even Housel’s low score highlights the stock’s volatility, which could deter patient long-term holders. The debate hinges on whether the stock’s cyclical positioning or lack of clear fundamentals outweighs its perceived risks.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 56
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 40
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 29
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Motley Fool · 19.8.2026
MT Newswires · 18.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 18.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 14.8.2026
Yahoo · 14.8.2026
Moby · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
MarketBeat · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
PR Newswire · 12.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Allot Ltd. (ALLT) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ALLT specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ALLT's technical score is 80/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; RSI 54.1 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.2% of price; Price is below the 200-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ALLT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 23 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grossman Boaz | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 182,000 | -4,000 | $7.80 |
| Grossman Boaz | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 4,000 | -4,000 | $7.80 |
| Grossman Boaz | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 186,000 | -6,000 | $7.45 |
| Grossman Boaz | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $7.45 |
| Groner Gili | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 26,666 | -26,666 | $7.86 |
| Harari Eyal David | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 29,111 | -29,111 | $7.64 |
| Harari Eyal David | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 1,099,118 | -29,111 | $7.64 |
| Charash Inbar | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 556 | -556 | $7.80 |
| Charash Inbar | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 28,008 | -556 | $7.80 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $7.50 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 212,000 | -2,000 | $7.50 |
| Lelah Noam | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 21,000 | -21,000 | $8.48 |
| Lelah Noam | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 176,250 | -21,000 | $8.48 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $7.58 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 214,000 | -6,000 | $7.58 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $7.39 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 220,000 | -5,000 | $7.39 |
| Grossman Boaz | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $7.37 |
| Grossman Boaz | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 192,000 | -5,000 | $7.37 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $7.32 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 225,000 | -5,000 | $7.32 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $7.13 |
| Shteiman Mark | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 230,000 | -3,000 | $7.13 |
| Harari Eyal David | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 72,259 | +72,259 | — |
| Harari Eyal David | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.5.2026 | 1,128,229 | +72,259 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,374,693 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,332,555 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
32.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 36.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology