Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$53.30
▼ $3.04 (-5.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:14 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$9.29B
Day Range
$53.21 - $57.28
52-Week Range
$39.41 - $87.54
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$45.78
Resistance
$57.28
ARE is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-39.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -54.7% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
74/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
88/100
Analog Quality
+3.3%
Median 40D Outcome
50/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+2.3% … +11.1%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
47%
-9.3% … -3.2%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.6%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
6 occurrence(s) · 17% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.6% | -2.7% … +3.2% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.9% | -4.9% … +4.3% | +0.2% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.6% | -4.2% … +5.6% | -0.0% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.3% | -17.3% … +8.9% | +0.6% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -2.9% | -21.5% … +11.5% | +0.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-28 | 74/100 | Consolidation | +1.6% | -2.9% |
| 2026-06-08 | 72/100 | Consolidation | -4.4% | +4.9% |
| 2025-07-07 | 69/100 | Consolidation | +2.8% | +11.1% |
| 2025-08-19 | 69/100 | Consolidation | +8.8% | -31.3% |
| 2025-09-24 | 68/100 | Consolidation | -9.5% | -43.0% |
| 2022-12-05 | 68/100 | Consolidation | -2.5% | -4.5% |
| 2026-06-24 | 67/100 | Consolidation | -2.2% | +4.0% |
| 2022-11-16 | 67/100 | Consolidation | +2.0% | +12.0% |
| 2022-10-26 | 67/100 | Downtrend | +8.4% | +13.2% |
| 2023-08-01 | 66/100 | Consolidation | -3.9% | -24.6% |
| 2025-09-03 | 65/100 | Consolidation | +2.3% | -34.3% |
| 2026-02-27 | 65/100 | Consolidation | -14.8% | -10.3% |
| 2023-11-20 | 64/100 | High Volatility | +24.0% | +14.2% |
| 2023-11-06 | 64/100 | Downtrend | +18.2% | +20.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | 63/100 | Consolidation | -9.2% | -18.5% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLRE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $56.09
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 16 to 47 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
29d ago · $53.49
Evidence: -3.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
29d ago · $53.49
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $50.55
Evidence: +9.5pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
31d ago · $50.55
Evidence: 2 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $46.13
Evidence: 0 bullish / 11 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
39
$46.25
Now
53
$53.30
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
88
Risk
34
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
26
Institutional
50
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING ARE...
Recent media coverage of Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE) has focused on its financial performance rebound, highlighting a narrower net loss in Q2 2026 compared to the prior year, alongside a first-half net income swing to profitability. The company also emphasized its role in advancing blood cancer research through its life science-focused Megacampus™ properties, supporting tenant R&D and philanthropic initiatives. Analysts noted ARE’s undervaluation and stock performance post-earnings, though cash flow challenges remain a key discussion point.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Alexandria Real Estate Equities. News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
22
Fundamentals
26
Technical
88
Valuation
55
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+15
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **passive but cautious** stance, with no dominant bias dominating. Herding and confirmation bias are elevated, consistent with investors selectively validating narratives while ignoring stagnant fundamentals. The narrative-reality gap (+6) may reinforce selective attention, but low volatility and muted volume imply no panic or FOMO. The key open question is whether the stock’s underperformance relative to peers reflects sector weakness or isolated skepticism—without clear triggers, the bias remains neutralized. Overconfidence and euphoria are muted by weak momentum, while anchoring and loss aversion are absent, leaving no clear behavioral edge.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:48 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Alexandria’s Q2 2026 net loss narrowed to $0.43 per share from $0.64, while first-half net income swung to $1.68 from a loss of $0.71"
"Declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.72 per common share for 3Q26"
"Highlighting strategic investments in tenants developing life-saving therapies in hematology and oncology"
"ARE stock up 5.7% since last earnings report"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 77/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for ARE reflects deep divides between methodologies rooted in fundamental valuation, behavioral caution, and market structure. Charles Mackay’s high score suggests the stock lacks obvious speculative frenzy, while the majority—particularly Fisher, Lynch, and Loeb—reject it outright, either for lacking growth potential, failing rigorous quality tests, or posing unacceptable risk. Meanwhile, Graham’s mixed verdicts (both conservative and enterprising) highlight a stock that may have *some* merits but doesn’t meet his strict thresholds, while Marks and Bogle’s lukewarm takes imply it’s neither a clear bargain nor a standout pick. The extreme lows from Veblen and Bagehot signal deeper concerns about speculative overreach or structural fragility, whereas Schwager’s and Nelson’s warnings point to technical or cyclical red flags. The debate hinges on whether ARE is a *reasonable* speculative play (for Mackay) or a stock where risks outweigh rewards (for Fisher, Lynch, or Loeb).
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 77
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 58
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 53
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 52
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 48
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 40
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 29
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 21
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 19
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 17
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 12
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 0 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
70.2%
Operating Margin
-54.7%
Net Margin
-47.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-9.2%
ROA
-4.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$8.44
Cash
$549.06M
Total Debt
$12.40B
Current Ratio
0.28
Debt/Equity
0.80
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.720 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.720 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.720 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.720 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.720 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.720 |
| 30.9.2025 | $1.320 |
| 29.9.2025 | $1.320 |
| 30.6.2025 | $1.320 |
| 29.6.2025 | $1.320 |
| 31.3.2025 | $1.320 |
| 30.3.2025 | $1.320 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$90.71
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$89.52
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Benzinga · 12.9.2026
Motley Fool · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
PR Newswire · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ARE currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ARE's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -54.7% (negative); Net margin: -47.4% (negative); Current ratio: 0.28.
Yes — ARE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 3 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gavinet Andres | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $50.93 |
| Moglia Peter M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 1,068 | -1,068 | $51.29 |
| MARCUS JOEL S | Open Market Purchase | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $46.28 |
| Moglia Peter M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 1,068 | -1,068 | $51.45 |
| Moglia Peter M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 373,022 | -1,068 | $51.45 |
| Woronoff Michael A | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 415 | +415 | — |
| Hash Steve | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 340 | +340 | — |
| Cain James P | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 144 | +144 | — |
| McGrath Sheila K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 128 | +128 | — |
| KLEIN RICHARD HUNTER | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 111 | +111 | — |
| KLEIN RICHARD HUNTER | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 21,866 | +111 | — |
| Hash Steve | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 30,997 | +340 | — |
| Cain James P | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 13,427 | +144 | — |
| Woronoff Michael A | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 28,505 | +415 | — |
| McGrath Sheila K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 12,205 | +128 | — |
| Moglia Peter M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 1,068 | -1,068 | $52.85 |
| Woronoff Michael A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 804 | +804 | — |
| Moglia Peter M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 374,090 | -1,068 | $52.85 |
| Woronoff Michael A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 28,090 | +804 | — |
| Binda Marc E | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $54.00 |
| Binda Marc E | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 188,264 | -2,000 | $54.00 |
| Moglia Peter M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 1,067 | -1,067 | $49.68 |
| Moglia Peter M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 375,158 | -1,067 | $49.68 |
| MARCUS JOEL S | Open Market Purchase | 6.5.2026 | 3,511 | +3,511 | $46.74 |
| MARCUS JOEL S | Open Market Purchase | 6.5.2026 | 3,989 | +3,989 | $45.99 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,299,131 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,878,589 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology