Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$173.98
▼ $1.60 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:14 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$81.07B
Day Range
$172.82 - $175.57
52-Week Range
$160.06 - $197.41
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$162.50
Resistance
$180.98
AMT is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-9.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $125.71 vs. price $173.98 (-27.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (64/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
80/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
-1.4%
Median 40D Outcome
63/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+3.4% … +9.2%
🟡 Base
13%
+0.1% … +0.6%
🔴 Bearish
33%
-10.7% … -4.5%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.1%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
2 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
2 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.4% | -0.7% … +3.7% | +0.1% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -1.9% … +3.4% | +0.4% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.1% | -3.4% … +6.4% | +0.8% |
| 40D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.4% | -3.8% … +11.1% | +0.6% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.4% | -8.8% … +7.7% | +0.5% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-18 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +2.9% | +6.6% |
| 2018-04-03 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -4.5% | +1.4% |
| 2019-12-13 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +10.1% | +2.5% |
| 2020-09-08 | 79/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -2.3% | -7.3% |
| 2017-12-21 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +1.1% | +1.9% |
| 2024-06-26 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +9.0% | +22.0% |
| 2018-05-18 | 79/100 | Downtrend | +0.9% | +8.8% |
| 2018-02-21 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.6% | -0.4% |
| 2018-10-15 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +12.8% | +13.1% |
| 2022-08-25 | 78/100 | Uptrend | -14.7% | -19.5% |
| 2020-10-19 | 77/100 | Downtrend | -0.2% | -10.3% |
| 2025-07-15 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -6.5% | -15.2% |
| 2024-03-26 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -10.7% | +0.4% |
| 2024-06-11 | 75/100 | Uptrend | +7.2% | +22.2% |
| 2025-06-26 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +5.7% | -11.2% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLRE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
29d ago · $175.80
Evidence: -4.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
29d ago · $175.80
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
29d ago · $175.80
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $173.00
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $173.00
Evidence: 7 bullish / 5 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $174.56
Evidence: 6 bullish / 6 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
58
$174.90
Now
53
$173.98
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
64
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
34
Risk
28
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
60
Institutional
17
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING AMT...
Recent media coverage of **American Tower (AMT)** has centered on its **undervalued stock valuation**, with analysts repeatedly highlighting that its shares may trade **39% below fair value** despite strong fundamentals. Despite a **5-year decline of ~30%** and a **recent 8% drop**, the company’s **maintained earnings outlook and cash flow strength** have drawn attention, contrasting with broader real estate REIT underperformance. Some reports also note its resilience amid industry-wide challenges like satellite and Dish Network risks.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Tower. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
60
Technical
34
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
75
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+35
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant *herding* dynamic, where traders align with peers despite modest underperformance. Elevated *euphoria* and *overconfidence* scores imply valuation optimism persists, despite flat momentum and neutral technicals. The 36-point narrative gap hints at a disconnect between positive sentiment and fundamental reality. The key question is whether the stock’s relative outperformance will sustain or if traders will pivot away from peers. The anchoring effect near resistance may act as a psychological barrier, while loss aversion could limit aggressive selling despite recent declines.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:49 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"American Tower stock has produced a weak 5 year result, yet current valuation checks suggest the shares may be pricing in more pessimism than its underlying cash flows imply."
"American Tower stock performance and recent analyst attention American Tower (AMT) is back in focus after the stock lagged broader real estate peers over the past year."
"analysts highlighted its maintained full year FFO outlook and recent earnings performance."
"how to weigh that upbeat analyst sentiment against a share price that has declined about 5% over the past year and 8% in the past 3 months."
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits methodologies into two stark camps: a minority of growth-oriented and speculative-leaning investors see potential, while the majority—especially the most conservative—see significant red flags. Thorstein Veblen’s high score suggests the stock aligns with his emphasis on real value creation, while Charles Mackay and Edgar Lawrence Smith detect early crowd-driven excitement or moderate appeal, though not a long-term lock. In contrast, the bulk of the pack—from Fisher and Marks down to Graham—flags serious concerns: Fisher dismisses it for lacking quality, Marks and Loeb warn of valuation/risk, and Graham’s near-zero score underscores its failure of even basic defensive metrics. The divide reflects a clash between speculative optimism (e.g., Veblen’s 71) and hard-nosed caution (e.g., Graham’s 5), with only a handful of mid-tier thinkers (like Housel or Nelson) treating it as a neutral or holdable but not compelling bet.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 82
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 33
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 30
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 28
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 27
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 24
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 13
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
74.2%
Operating Margin
45.5%
Net Margin
23.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
69.3%
ROA
4.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.41
Cash
$1.47B
Total Debt
$3.39B
Current Ratio
0.40
Debt/Equity
10.19
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 12.6.2026 | $1.790 |
| 11.6.2026 | $1.790 |
| 14.4.2026 | $1.790 |
| 13.4.2026 | $1.790 |
| 29.12.2025 | $1.700 |
| 28.12.2025 | $1.700 |
| 30.9.2025 | $1.700 |
| 29.9.2025 | $1.700 |
| 13.6.2025 | $1.700 |
| 12.6.2025 | $1.700 |
| 11.4.2025 | $1.700 |
| 10.4.2025 | $1.700 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$173.98
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$125.71
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-27.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.4% | $3.91B | $3.59B |
| 2 | 3.1% | $4.03B | $3.39B |
| 3 | 2.9% | $4.15B | $3.21B |
| 4 | 2.7% | $4.26B | $3.02B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $4.37B | $2.84B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$3.78B
Terminal Value
$68.92B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$44.79B
Enterprise Value
$60.84B
Net Debt
$1.91B
Equity Value
$58.93B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.80
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.05
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 10 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 20.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
MarketBeat · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
MarketBeat · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
MarketBeat · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
American Tower (AMT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMT currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMT's estimated fair value is $125.71, which is 27.7% below the current price of $173.98. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMT's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 69.3% — strong; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $125.71 vs. price $173.98 (-27.7%); Current ratio: 0.40; Calmar: -0.02 (3y annualized return -0.6% / max drawdown 33.2%).
Yes — AMT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalathur Rajesh | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 7,765 | +2,829 | $177.00 |
| Kalathur Rajesh | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 2,829 | +2,829 | $177.00 |
| Meyer Robert Joseph | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $178.89 |
| Dowling Ruth T | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 1,106 | -1,106 | $174.96 |
| Dowling Ruth T | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 27,711 | -1,106 | $174.96 |
| Meyer Robert Joseph | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 21,428 | -5,000 | $178.89 |
| Dowling Ruth T | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 685 | -685 | $169.54 |
| Dowling Ruth T | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 28,817 | -685 | $169.54 |
| Meyer Robert Joseph | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 153 | -153 | $187.53 |
| Meyer Robert Joseph | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 26,286 | -153 | $187.53 |
| REEVE PAMELA D A | Gift | 28.5.2026 | 810 | -810 | — |
| REEVE PAMELA D A | Gift | 28.5.2026 | 21,089 | -810 | — |
| Dowling Ruth T | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 416 | -416 | $177.54 |
| Dowling Ruth T | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 29,461 | -416 | $177.54 |
| Dowling Ruth T | Open Market Sale | 28.4.2026 | 556 | -556 | $178.48 |
| Dowling Ruth T | Open Market Sale | 28.4.2026 | 29,877 | -556 | $178.48 |
| Vondran Steven O | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.3.2026 | 2,158 | -2,158 | $182.85 |
| Noel Eugene M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.3.2026 | 719 | -719 | $182.85 |
| Dowling Ruth T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.3.2026 | 863 | -863 | $182.85 |
| Meyer Robert Joseph | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.3.2026 | 684 | -684 | $182.85 |
| Smith Rodney M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.3.2026 | 1,295 | -1,295 | $182.85 |
| Rossi Richard C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.3.2026 | 684 | -684 | $182.85 |
| Font Juan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.3.2026 | 928 | -928 | $182.85 |
| Vondran Steven O | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.3.2026 | 108,902 | -2,158 | $182.85 |
| Noel Eugene M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.3.2026 | 34,542 | -719 | $182.85 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,929,222 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,601,720 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology