Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$3.10
▲ $0.02 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:24 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$3.02 - $3.11
52-Week Range
$1.42 - $3.20
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$2.45
Resistance
$3.20
USEA is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+76.1% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 10/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
USEA demonstrates a robust overall investor score of 79, underpinned by strong technical and news-driven fundamentals, though tempered by notable risk factors. The technical category scores an impressive 88, reflecting a clear bullish momentum: the stock price remains above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, while the MACD histogram and RSI (65.6) indicate healthy upward momentum. The news category also scores well at 80, with positive coverage including a buy recommendation based on dividend yield and valuation, alongside strong Q2 earnings performance that exceeded estimates and drove a 3% stock jump. However, the risk category drags the score down to 34, primarily due to a high maximum drawdown potential (62.5% over three years) and elevated ATR (4.4%), signaling volatility and potential instability. The CMF (–0.15) further suggests a slight outflow of capital, which could indicate short-term caution among investors.
The stock price is positioned above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 65.6, indicating strong upward momentum and overbought conditions. The %K value (59.4) remains neutral, suggesting no extreme overbought or oversold signals.
This technical strength suggests a favorable short-to-medium-term trend, reinforcing investor confidence in continued upward movement.
Recent news highlights include a strong buy recommendation tied to dividend yield and valuation, positive pre-market movement in industrials stocks, and Q2 earnings that surpassed estimates, driving a 3% stock rally. CEO commentary on fleet expansion and shareholder returns adds strategic validation.
Positive news coverage and earnings outperformance can attract institutional and retail investors, reinforcing the stock’s bullish narrative.
The stock exhibits a high maximum drawdown of 62.5% over three years, alongside a relatively high ATR (4.4%) and a negative CMF (–0.15), indicating volatility and potential short-term capital outflow. The Sharpe ratio (0.11) further suggests weak risk-adjusted returns.
These risk metrics signal heightened volatility and potential downside risk, which could deter risk-averse investors or lead to sharp corrections.
StockIQ conclusion
USEA presents a compelling case with strong technical and news-driven fundamentals, supported by recent earnings beats and positive market sentiment. However, the stock’s high volatility and maximum drawdown potential create significant risk, which may limit its appeal to conservative investors. The balance between momentum-driven strength and inherent volatility will likely dictate its near-term performance, with future execution of strategic initiatives playing a critical role in mitigating risk.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
81
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $3.10
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $3.10
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.10
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $3.09
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $3.08
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $3.06
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $3.06
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 67)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $3.01
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $2.99
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $2.99
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $2.97
Evidence: 2.0x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $2.97
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
14d ago · $3.04
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 55)
What happened after
16d ago · $2.98
Evidence: 1.8x recent average volume
What happened after
16d ago · $2.98
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
79
$2.92
Now
81
$3.10
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
91
Risk
34
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
50
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
🕵️ What the Detective found on USEA
Detective Score 70/100 · 2 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here are mixed — not clear-cut.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
2 signals are currently converging on USEA at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of United Maritime Corporation (USEA) has centered on its strong financial performance and strategic initiatives. The company’s Q2 2026 earnings report highlighted a significant earnings beat, with adjusted EPS of $0.15 surpassing estimates by 1400%, alongside solid revenue growth. Leadership discussions emphasized fleet repositioning, expansion plans for Capesize vessels, and capital redeployment to enhance shareholder returns, including a declared $0.10 dividend. Analysts have noted the company’s discounted valuation and high dividend yield as potential catalysts for future stock appreciation.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about United Maritime Corporation. News trend score: 80. Reason: 5 of the last 13 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
50
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
—
Technical
91
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+17%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+18
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for USEA is dominated by **FOMO**, driven by strong technical momentum, elevated volume, and extreme overbought conditions (RSI 78, Bollinger %B 1.14). The positive news sentiment (80/100) further amplifies urgency to join the rally. However, the **narrative gap** (70 vs. 50) hints at a disconnect between market euphoria and potential fundamentals. The key open question is whether this momentum will sustain or if traders will pivot when overbought conditions correct. Herding and anchoring also play secondary roles, with traders possibly anchoring near resistance or following peers’ slight underperformance.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:25 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"United Maritime reported quarterly earnings of $0.15 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $0.01 by 1400 percent."
"Fleet repositioning and $0.10 dividend declared."
"Strategic Fleet Shift Drives..."
"United Maritime Files $300 Million Mixed Shelf"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 81/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between technical and fundamental investors, with traders like Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager seeing clear opportunities while most value-oriented methodologies hit roadblocks. Livermore’s high score reflects a strong upward price trend that aligns with his momentum-driven approach, while Schwager’s disciplined setup suggests favorable risk-reward dynamics. Meanwhile, fundamentalists like Graham, Fisher, and Lynch all default to neutral or negative verdicts due to insufficient data on dividends, growth, or balance sheets—leaving them unable to form a confident buy signal. Even those who focus on market psychology, like Charles Mackay and Morgan Housel, flag red flags: Mackay sees crowd-driven hype, and Housel warns of volatility that could unsettle patient investors. The contrast highlights how technical traders thrive on price action, while fundamentalists and cycle analysts remain skeptical without deeper financial clarity.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 81
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 28
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 25
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 21
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 12
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 0 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.6.2026 | $0.100 |
| 28.6.2026 | $0.100 |
| 27.3.2026 | $0.100 |
| 26.3.2026 | $0.100 |
| 29.12.2025 | $0.090 |
| 28.12.2025 | $0.090 |
| 18.8.2025 | $0.030 |
| 17.8.2025 | $0.030 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.010 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.010 |
| 27.3.2025 | $0.010 |
| 26.3.2025 | $0.010 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 8 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 13 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
ChartMill · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 30.7.2026
Benzinga · 30.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 27.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.7.2026
MT Newswires · 13.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 21.5.2026
GlobeNewswire · 19.5.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for United Maritime Corporation (USEA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for USEA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
USEA's technical score is 91/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.1% of price; Calmar: 0.08 (3y annualized return 4.7% / max drawdown 62.5%).
Yes — USEA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 8 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kostopoulos Dimitrios | Open Market Purchase | 31.7.2026 | 15,000 | +15,000 | $2.74 |
| Kostopoulos Dimitrios | Open Market Purchase | 31.7.2026 | 335,000 | +15,000 | $2.74 |
| Gyftakis Stavros | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $2.64 |
| Gyftakis Stavros | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 246,678 | -5,000 | $2.64 |
| Kostopoulos Dimitrios | Open Market Purchase | 22.5.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $2.40 |
| Kostopoulos Dimitrios | Open Market Purchase | 22.5.2026 | 320,000 | +20,000 | $2.40 |
| Gyftakis Stavros | Open Market Sale | 6.4.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $2.08 |
| Gyftakis Stavros | Open Market Sale | 6.4.2026 | 251,678 | -5,000 | $2.08 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
945,995 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 868,083 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology