Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$184.06
▲ $0.15 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:14 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/01/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$182.74 - $185.62
52-Week Range
—
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$63.06
Resistance
$71.12
AVB is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-1.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $102.41 vs. price $184.06 (-44.4%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
5d ago · $184.06
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 6 to 31 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
12d ago · $68.14
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 17 to -8 day-over-day
What happened after
29d ago · $184.06
Evidence: +179.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
29d ago · $184.06
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
29d ago · $184.06
Evidence: 1 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $184.06
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $184.06
Evidence: 1.9x recent average volume
What happened after
31d ago · $184.06
Evidence: 1 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $184.06
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $184.06
Evidence: 1.9x recent average volume
What happened after
32d ago · $184.06
Evidence: 1 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
48
$184.06
Now
55
$184.06
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
82
Risk
42
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
56
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING AVB...
Recent media coverage of **AvalonBay Communities (AVB)** has centered on its financial momentum and industry positioning, particularly following its inclusion in the S&P 500. Headlines highlight its **365% post-IPO growth** and strong market performance, alongside speculation about its future trajectory amid broader economic signals. Notably, the **Vivmark merger**—which made Vivmark the largest U.S. apartment REIT—has been tied to AVB’s strategic shifts, though direct AVB-related news is sparse. Most attention instead revolves around related REITs and market trends rather than specific AVB developments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AvalonBay Communities. News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
33
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
56
Technical
82
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+3%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
33
Narrative Gap
+31
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests traders are overestimating AVB’s fundamentals despite clear price-fair-value divergence, consistent with overconfidence. The narrative gap (17) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations and reality, while low volatility (0.50x ATR) dampens panic despite sharp momentum. The key question: *Will traders reassess overvaluation or double down on perceived undervaluation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:16 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Vivmark Becomes Largest US Apartment REIT After Merger"
"Meet the Newest Member of the S&P 500... It Can Keep Climbing From Here"
"Up 365% Since Its IPO"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 65/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between defensive, cyclical, and contrarian approaches on one end and more stringent growth, quality, or risk-averse frameworks on the other. Methodologies like Mackay’s crowd psychology and Nelson’s cycle analysis—both scoring near the top—suggest the stock may be undervalued relative to speculative fervor or positioned favorably within a broader market cycle. Meanwhile, Graham’s defensive and enterprising investor rules, along with Marks’ risk-pricing framework, lean cautiously positive, viewing it as a reasonable value play with manageable risk. However, Fisher’s quality focus, Lynch’s growth-at-a-reasonable-price standard, and Loeb’s risk aversion all dismiss it outright, scoring poorly because the stock lacks the signature traits they demand—consistent profitability, sustainable growth, or structural safety. The divide underscores whether the investor prioritizes relative valuation, cyclical timing, or strict qualitative filters.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 61
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 56
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 42
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 31
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 27
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 17
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 16
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 15
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 262 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$63.06
Range Bottom
$71.12
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
63.1%
Operating Margin
21.3%
Net Margin
34.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
9.0%
ROA
4.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.40
Cash
$187.23M
Total Debt
$9.33B
Current Ratio
0.19
Debt/Equity
0.81
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.637 |
| 29.6.2026 | $1.780 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.637 |
| 30.3.2026 | $1.780 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.627 |
| 30.12.2025 | $1.750 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.627 |
| 29.9.2025 | $1.750 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.627 |
| 29.6.2025 | $1.750 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.627 |
| 30.3.2025 | $1.750 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$184.06
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$102.41
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-44.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
5.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5% | $1.49B | $1.36B |
| 2 | 4.7% | $1.56B | $1.31B |
| 3 | 4.0% | $1.62B | $1.25B |
| 4 | 3.2% | $1.67B | $1.18B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.71B | $1.11B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.41B
Terminal Value
$27.00B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$17.55B
Enterprise Value
$23.77B
Net Debt
$9.14B
Equity Value
$14.63B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$82.89
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$80.43
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ACCESS Newswire · 26.8.2026
PR Newswire · 25.8.2026
Multifamily Dive · 24.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 21.8.2026
Motley Fool · 21.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 20.8.2026
CRE Daily · 19.8.2026
The Daily Upside · 19.8.2026
Barrons.com · 18.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
Business Wire · 17.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 17.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 17.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
ChartMill · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 17.8.2026
TheStreet · 16.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.8.2026
AvalonBay Communities (AVB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AVB currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AVB's estimated fair value is $102.41, which is 44.4% below the current price of $184.06. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AVB's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $102.41 vs. price $184.06 (-44.4%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Current ratio: 0.19.
Yes — AVB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lieb Richard J | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 9,928.632 | -9,928.632 | — |
| HAVNER RONALD L JR | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 21,149.881 | -21,149.881 | — |
| Flynn Conor C | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 2,021.942 | -2,021.942 | — |
| Schall Benjamin | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 8,304 | -8,304 | — |
| Hills Stephen P. | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 10,274.573 | -10,274.573 | — |
| Howard Christopher B. | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 7,596.035 | -7,596.035 | — |
| Schall Benjamin | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 10,073 | -10,073 | — |
| Brown Terry S. | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 20,855.923 | -20,855.923 | — |
| Lynch Nnenna | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 7,052.046 | -7,052.046 | — |
| Schall Benjamin | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 12,651 | -12,651 | — |
| Schall Benjamin | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 9,473 | -9,473 | — |
| Schall Benjamin | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 78,257 | +78,257 | — |
| Schall Benjamin | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 178,819.761 | -178,819.761 | — |
| Schall Benjamin | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 21,772 | -21,772 | — |
| Willson Sean Thomas | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 5,902.723 | -5,902.723 | — |
| Walsh Alaine Susan | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 2,444 | -2,444 | — |
| Willson Sean Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 1,430 | +1,430 | — |
| SCHULMAN EDWARD M | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 36,177.795 | -36,177.795 | — |
| Walsh Alaine Susan | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 13,019 | -13,019 | — |
| Breslin Sean J. | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 17,458 | -17,458 | — |
| SCHULMAN EDWARD M | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 6,983 | -6,983 | — |
| Thomas Pamela Rogers | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 13,561 | +13,561 | — |
| Birenbaum Matthew H. | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 113,020.943 | -113,020.943 | — |
| Breslin Sean J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 27,735 | +27,735 | — |
| SCHULMAN EDWARD M | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 12,770 | +12,770 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,752,768 shares short as of 2026-07-31 · vs. 3,181,902 on 2026-07-15
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 41.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology