Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$1.29
▲ $0.03 (+2.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 10:33 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$367.47M
Day Range
$1.21 - $1.33
52-Week Range
$0.54 - $2.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.11.2026
Support
$0.68
Resistance
$1.34
+152.9% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.6% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
83
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $1.29
Evidence: 1.6x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $1.29
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $1.29
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 26 to 73 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $1.29
Evidence: 1.6x recent average volume
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $1.29
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
16d ago · $1.21
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 21 to 48 day-over-day
What happened after
22d ago · $1.15
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
22d ago · $1.15
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
81
$1.23
Now
83
$1.29
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
85
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
The recent English-language media coverage for **TRX Gold Corporation** is limited, as the provided sources do not mention the company directly. The available headlines focus on unrelated topics, including lithium stocks, cryptocurrency platform integrations (specifically TRON’s blockchain, TRX), and unrelated business or sports news. No substantive or recurring coverage of TRX Gold Corporation appears in these sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about TRX Gold Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
66
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
75
Fundamentals
—
Technical
85
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+40%
Market Narrative
86
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+36
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
TRX’s psychology suggests a detached euphoria—buyers appear confident in narrative-driven momentum despite zero price movement. The 100/100 sentiment and elevated 200-day distance imply overvaluation relative to recent trends, while flat ROC and RSI (56) signal no technical urgency. The key question: is this detached optimism anchored in fundamentals, or is it a speculative bubble waiting for a catalyst? Narrative-reality gap (14) hints at potential mispricing if reality diverges from hype.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 07:12 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"record quarterly gold production of 8,173 ounces, up 28%"
"has been added to the MVIS® Global Junior Gold Miners Index"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for TRX reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Thorstein Veblen’s high score suggests he sees genuine value creation in the company’s growth trajectory, aligning with his focus on real economic contributions. In contrast, Morgan Housel’s zero score highlights how his patience-based approach would dismiss the stock as too volatile for long-term holders, while Gerald Loeb’s low score flags it as an unacceptable risk profile. Meanwhile, methodologies like those of Benjamin Graham or Philip Fisher are stymied by insufficient data, leaving them neutral—unlike Howard Marks, who sees it as mid-cycle with cautionary risk/valuation signals. The crowd-driven excitement noted by Charles Mackay contrasts sharply with Jesse Livermore’s indecision, underscoring whether the stock’s momentum is sustainable or speculative.
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 79
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 41
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 9
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
CNW Group · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
CryptoProwl · 27.8.2026
Motley Fool · 23.8.2026
AFP · 23.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
NFL Highlights · 23.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for TRX specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
TRX's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.6% of price; %K 80.8 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for TRX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 6 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geier International Strategies Fund, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2011 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $300.00 |
| Geier International Strategies Fund, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2011 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $300.00 |
| Geier International Strategies Fund, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 29.4.2011 | 2,750 | +2,750 | $1,000.00 |
| Geier International Strategies Fund, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 29.4.2011 | 2,250 | +2,250 | $900.00 |
| Geier International Strategies Fund, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 29.4.2011 | 2,250 | +2,250 | $900.00 |
| Geier International Strategies Fund, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 29.4.2011 | 2,750 | +2,750 | $1,000.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,007,779 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,603,810 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology