Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$205.32
▲ $0.85 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:07 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$203.11 - $205.32
52-Week Range
$172.19 - $238.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$200.37
Resistance
$238.50
SPG is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+14.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 95.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 5.46
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
88/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+2.9%
Median 40D Outcome
64/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+5.2% … +9.2%
🟡 Base
13%
+0.1% … +0.3%
🔴 Bearish
33%
-8.9% … -5.5%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +2.6%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
2 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
3 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.6% | -0.3% … +4.9% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.5% | -2.2% … +5.6% | +0.5% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.6% | -5.0% … +5.8% | +0.9% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.9% | -5.1% … +9.7% | +1.6% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.0% | -8.3% … +11.2% | +2.6% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-26 | 88/100 | Downtrend | +5.7% | +13.5% |
| 2019-06-05 | 87/100 | Downtrend | +0.0% | -10.1% |
| 2019-07-24 | 86/100 | Downtrend | -7.4% | -6.5% |
| 2026-03-30 | 86/100 | Consolidation | +11.2% | +23.7% |
| 2018-02-12 | 86/100 | Downtrend | +0.4% | +2.0% |
| 2018-10-10 | 86/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +8.5% | +0.3% |
| 2024-05-01 | 86/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +5.9% | +9.0% |
| 2018-01-25 | 86/100 | Consolidation | -4.6% | -10.5% |
| 2019-12-19 | 85/100 | Downtrend | +2.6% | -69.1% |
| 2019-06-21 | 84/100 | Downtrend | -5.5% | -6.0% |
| 2023-09-08 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -8.9% | +14.2% |
| 2023-03-01 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -12.1% | -16.5% |
| 2023-06-01 | 82/100 | Downtrend | +11.7% | +8.0% |
| 2025-06-25 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +4.8% | +14.8% |
| 2025-10-31 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +5.3% | +8.0% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLRE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
55
Momentum
30
Risk
52
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
66
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING SPG...
Recent media coverage of Simon Property Group has centered on its strategic pivot into digital commerce and advertising. The company’s launch of the **Simon Media Network**, a data-driven advertising platform leveraging its mall traffic and consumer insights, has drawn attention as a bold expansion beyond traditional retail real estate. Meanwhile, broader market shifts—such as the S&P 100’s removal of mall-focused retailers like Simon Property Group (alongside Nike and Colgate) in favor of AI and tech stocks—highlight industry trends reshaping blue-chip indices. The focus remains on its transition into experiential retail and commerce-driven monetization.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Simon Property Group. News trend score: 56. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 7 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
66
Technical
30
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s fixation on SPG’s proximity to support (1.7%) dominates behavior, suggesting traders anchor to this level despite weak momentum (-3.7% ROC) and neutral sentiment (56/100). The narrow narrative-reality gap (2 points) implies limited misalignment, but the absence of panic or herding hints at cautious, non-emotional anchoring. Key uncertainty remains: whether traders will break support or hold, given the lack of volatility spikes (0.86x ATR).
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:27 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Nike and Colgate for 4 AI Stocks. Here’s What That Means for Your Portfolio"
"Dell, Palo Alto, Arista and Sandisk move in, signaling a major shift toward tech stocks"
"Simon Property Group launched Simon Media Network, a commerce media platform that lets brands reach high-intent shoppers"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a deep split between methodologies prioritizing growth and momentum versus those emphasizing value, risk, and market efficiency. The highest-scoring approaches—Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle analysis (94) and Thorstein Veblen’s real-value alignment (89)—suggest the stock may be undervalued relative to its underlying fundamentals or market positioning, framing it as a cyclical or growth opportunity. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch (75) and Charles Mackay (73) also lean bullish, seeing either growth potential or a lack of speculative mania, though their enthusiasm wanes compared to the top two. In contrast, the value-focused camp—led by Benjamin Graham (28 and 16)—rejects the stock outright, calling it statistically overpriced even for his more aggressive Enterprising Investor criteria. The middle ground, with scores like Philip Fisher (66) and Jack Schwager (65), acknowledges a disciplined setup but lacks the exceptional quality or edge Fisher sought or the high-conviction reward/risk Schwager typically demands. Even the efficient-market skeptics (37) and trend-followers like Jesse Livermore (43) downgrade it, either because it doesn’t justify active picking or because its price action contradicts Livermore’s trend-following rules. The divergence underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in its growth narrative (backed by Nelson, Veblen, and Lynch) or its perceived risks (highlighted by Graham, Bagehot, and Livermore).
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 94
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 89
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 86
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 75
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 73
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 66
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 52
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 42
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 29
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 17
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 7
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
49.9%
Net Margin
84.3%
EBITDA Margin
72.3%
ROE
103.0%
ROA
13.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$14.17
Cash
$823.15M
Total Debt
$28.43B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
5.46
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 9.9.2026 | $2.250 |
| 9.6.2026 | $2.250 |
| 8.6.2026 | $2.250 |
| 10.3.2026 | $2.200 |
| 9.3.2026 | $2.200 |
| 10.12.2025 | $2.200 |
| 9.12.2025 | $2.200 |
| 9.9.2025 | $2.150 |
| 8.9.2025 | $2.150 |
| 9.6.2025 | $2.100 |
| 8.6.2025 | $2.100 |
| 10.3.2025 | $2.100 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$15.96
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$15.90
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 5 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Simon Property Group (SPG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SPG currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SPG's technical score is 30/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 95.2%; Net income growth: 96.6%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 5.46; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — SPG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 15 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jackson Matthew A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 250 | -250 | $214.56 |
| Simon Eli | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 5,821 | -5,821 | $214.56 |
| Kelly Kevin M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 1,434 | -1,434 | $214.56 |
| SOKOLOV RICHARD S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 2,306 | -2,306 | $214.56 |
| Simon Eli | Gift | 20.8.2026 | 57,546 | +57,546 | — |
| Simon Eli | Gift | 20.8.2026 | 7,679,189 | +7,679,189 | — |
| Simon Eli | W | 20.8.2026 | 8,000 | +8,000 | — |
| Simon Eli | Gift | 20.8.2026 | 7,679,189 | +7,679,189 | — |
| Simon Eli | W | 20.8.2026 | 8,000 | +8,000 | — |
| Simon Eli | Gift | 20.8.2026 | 57,546 | +57,546 | — |
| Aeppel Glyn | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 44 | +44 | $224.33 |
| Aeppel Glyn | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 199 | +199 | $223.14 |
| Jones Nina P | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 2 | +2 | $223.49 |
| Jones Nina P | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 41 | +41 | $223.14 |
| LEWIS RANDALL J | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 4 | +4 | $223.51 |
| RODKIN GARY M | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 43 | +43 | $224.31 |
| GLASSCOCK LARRY C | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 54 | +54 | $224.92 |
| LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 430 | +430 | $223.14 |
| LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 25 | +25 | $223.94 |
| STEWART MARTA R | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 1 | +1 | $224.10 |
| RODKIN GARY M | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 4 | +4 | $223.25 |
| Cicco Martin J | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 13 | +13 | $223.14 |
| Smith Daniel C. | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 314 | +314 | $223.14 |
| LEWIS RANDALL J | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 58 | +58 | $223.14 |
| LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S | Open Market Purchase | 30.6.2026 | 53 | +53 | $225.03 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,520,550 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,781,656 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology