Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$178.59
▼ $2.54 (-1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 09:12 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$18.95B
Day Range
$178.28 - $181.92
52-Week Range
$162.41 - $224.46
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$171.12
Resistance
$194.23
SBAC is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-10.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 41.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $38.11 vs. price $178.59 (-78.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (62/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
81/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
-4.5%
Median 40D Outcome
44/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+4.4% … +15.2%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
53%
-12.8% … -9.3%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 40 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -5.5%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
5 occurrence(s) · 40% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -4.9% … +3.7% | +0.1% |
| 10D | 33% (15%–58%) | -2.6% | -7.5% … +3.1% | +0.1% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | -5.5% | -10.0% … +7.4% | +0.4% |
| 40D | 27% (11%–52%) | -4.5% | -7.2% … +4.8% | +0.4% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.7% | -6.4% … +11.2% | +0.6% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-19 | 81/100 | Downtrend | -18.8% | -3.3% |
| 2026-03-11 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +15.9% | +10.3% |
| 2021-01-12 | 80/100 | Downtrend | +1.8% | +5.5% |
| 2024-04-02 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -12.6% | -7.5% |
| 2022-08-30 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -10.2% | -8.3% |
| 2018-10-15 | 78/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +15.3% | +13.9% |
| 2021-02-22 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +5.5% | +12.2% |
| 2025-12-01 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +3.3% | +6.7% |
| 2023-02-16 | 77/100 | Downtrend | -9.7% | -17.0% |
| 2026-06-16 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -5.5% | -5.2% |
| 2024-12-12 | 74/100 | Consolidation | -9.7% | -0.7% |
| 2026-06-02 | 74/100 | Consolidation | -7.9% | -4.7% |
| 2025-04-08 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +15.2% | +12.0% |
| 2025-08-08 | 72/100 | Consolidation | -13.4% | -12.4% |
| 2026-02-03 | 72/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +9.3% | +23.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLRE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
13
Risk
40
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
60
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING SBAC...
Recent media coverage of **SBA Communications** has focused on its mixed financial performance and market valuation. The company achieved its first-ever investment-grade credit rating (BBB from S&P) in Q2 2026, despite a **12.9% drop in net income** and lower earnings per share. Analysts highlight its **undervaluation**, suggesting the stock may trade **19–30% below fair value** due to strong cash flow and long-term contracts, despite a **43.6% decline in share price over five years**. Industry comparisons also note its position as a cell tower REIT amid broader market pressures.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SBA Communications. News trend score: 62. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
21
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
54
Fundamentals
60
Technical
13
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
-4%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests traders are overconfident in SBAC’s valuation (+395% above DCF) while momentum (+3.8% ROC) slightly outpaces fundamentals. Herding is muted as peers underperformed, but anchoring near resistance (2.5%) and FOMO-driven volume (1.04x) indicate selective participation. The key question: *Is the price rally justified by fundamentals, or is overconfidence masking a narrative-reality disconnect?* Loss aversion lingers from recent declines, but euphoria remains restrained by neutral RSI and underperformance relative to peers.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:21 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"SBA Communications (SBAC) earned its first-ever investment-grade credit rating from S&P, upgrading to BBB"
"net income attributable to the company fell 12.9% year over year to $198.8 million"
"SBAC stock may trade at a discount to the company’s underlying cash flow potential"
"The company’s long-term contracts and cash flow profile can support an investment case"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for SBAC reflects deep methodological contrasts: Lynch and Smith’s high scores (84 and 75) suggest a growth-driven opportunity where fundamentals or long-term potential justify aggressive buy-and-hold confidence, while Graham’s near-zero score (3) and Livermore’s negative trend (32) flag structural risks—either overvaluation or a market divergence from core principles. Fisher’s lukewarm 47 and Marks’ cautious 50 imply the stock lacks the *Fisherian* quality or *Marksian* margin of safety, whereas Veblen’s 56 hints at profit uncertainty despite growth. Meanwhile, the consensus of mid-range scores (44–56) from Housel, Loeb, and Bagehot signals moderate risk, but the extreme lows from Nelson (25) and Schwager (25) suggest technical or cyclical overreach that would deter disciplined traders. The tension between bullish growth narratives and bearish valuation/liquidity concerns underscores how SBAC’s fate hinges on whether one prioritizes momentum (Lynch) or defensive metrics (Graham).
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 84
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 81
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 75
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 48
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 47
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 47
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 33
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 7
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after a decline, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of an accumulation phase.
Low confidence
$171.12
Range Bottom
$194.23
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
75.5%
Operating Margin
47.7%
Net Margin
37.4%
EBITDA Margin
58.1%
ROE
-21.7%
ROA
9.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.83
Cash
$264.57M
Total Debt
$12.90B
Current Ratio
0.29
Debt/Equity
-2.66
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2026 | $1.250 |
| 22.5.2026 | $1.250 |
| 21.5.2026 | $1.250 |
| 13.3.2026 | $1.250 |
| 12.3.2026 | $1.250 |
| 13.11.2025 | $1.110 |
| 12.11.2025 | $1.110 |
| 21.8.2025 | $1.110 |
| 20.8.2025 | $1.110 |
| 22.5.2025 | $1.110 |
| 21.5.2025 | $1.110 |
| 13.3.2025 | $1.110 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$178.59
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$38.11
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-78.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.3% | $1.09B | $1.00B |
| 2 | 2.3% | $1.12B | $939.59M |
| 3 | 2.4% | $1.14B | $882.62M |
| 4 | 2.4% | $1.17B | $829.55M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.20B | $780.08M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.07B
Terminal Value
$18.93B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$12.30B
Enterprise Value
$16.73B
Net Debt
$12.64B
Equity Value
$4.10B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$45.14
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$71.94
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 8 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Business Wire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
SBA Communications (SBAC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SBAC currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SBAC's estimated fair value is $38.11, which is 78.7% below the current price of $178.59. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SBAC's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 41.2%; Net income growth: 40.6%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $38.11 vs. price $178.59 (-78.7%); Current ratio: 0.29; Calmar: -0.16 (3y annualized return -5.8% / max drawdown 35.2%).
Yes — SBAC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krouse George R Jr | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 300 | -300 | $182.67 |
| DAY DONALD | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 457 | +457 | — |
| DAY DONALD | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 170.689 | -170.689 | $180.98 |
| DAY DONALD | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 457 | -457 | — |
| DAY DONALD | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 10,163 | +457 | — |
| DAY DONALD | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 9,992 | -171 | $180.98 |
| DAY DONALD | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 457 | -457 | — |
| BEEBE KEVIN L | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| STOOPS JEFFREY | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| Johnson Jay LeCoryelle | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| BOWEN LAURIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| Chan Mary S | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| LANGER JACK | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| Krouse George R Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| BERNSTEIN STEVEN E | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| Wilson Amy E | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| BERNSTEIN STEVEN E | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| STOOPS JEFFREY | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| BEEBE KEVIN L | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| LANGER JACK | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| Krouse George R Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| Chan Mary S | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| Johnson Jay LeCoryelle | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| Wilson Amy E | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
| BOWEN LAURIE | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.5.2026 | 1,108 | +1,108 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,741,690 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,792,266 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology