Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$81.58
▼ $0.05 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/15 01:35 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
$170.12B
Day Range
$81.54 - $82.14
52-Week Range
$69.37 - $98.75
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
NEE is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+13.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.60
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
81/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+2.9%
Median 40D Outcome
59/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+2.6% … +5.8%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.1% … -0.0%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-13.3% … -2.9%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 40 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.1%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.2% | -0.6% … +3.2% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.9% | -1.0% … +2.6% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.1% | -3.9% … +3.1% | +1.3% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.9% | -5.7% … +8.6% | +2.2% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.1% | -8.2% … +8.5% | +3.3% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-07 | 81/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -1.6% | -5.0% |
| 2023-09-05 | 80/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -20.3% | -11.8% |
| 2023-06-29 | 80/100 | Downtrend | +0.1% | -7.3% |
| 2023-05-25 | 79/100 | Downtrend | +1.2% | -8.0% |
| 2024-12-13 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -5.9% | -0.1% |
| 2018-06-11 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +7.7% | +10.4% |
| 2018-05-18 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +2.5% | +9.9% |
| 2023-07-19 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -6.3% | -26.5% |
| 2023-09-26 | 78/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -15.6% | -8.4% |
| 2018-10-01 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +3.5% | +3.1% |
| 2018-01-12 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -0.2% | +7.1% |
| 2021-06-04 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +2.7% | +16.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +13.8% | +18.3% |
| 2023-02-24 | 75/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +3.8% | +2.3% |
| 2023-05-09 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -1.9% | -8.5% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLU (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
24
Risk
36
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
52
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING NEE...
Recent media coverage of NextEra Energy has primarily focused on its securing a **$1.9 billion loan from the U.S. Department of Energy** to restart the **Duane Arnold Energy Center**, Iowa’s only nuclear plant. The deal, announced across major outlets, highlights NextEra’s push into nuclear energy alongside renewable investments. Investor meetings in September and October were also noted, signaling strategic financial updates amid the plant’s revival.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about NextEra Energy. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
78
Fundamentals
52
Technical
24
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for NEE suggests a dominant **herding** dynamic, as the stock’s 0.5% gain aligns perfectly with its utility sector peers. While FOMO and anchoring are present, they’re muted by weak momentum and neutral sentiment. The narrative gap (52 vs. 41) hints at traders overestimating positive developments relative to fundamentals. The key question: *Will this synchronized movement persist, or will divergence emerge as external catalysts shift?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:08 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$1.9 billion loan from US government to restart Iowa's Duane Arnold nuclear plant"
"NextEra Energy to meet with investors throughout September and early October"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements about what makes a sound investment. Charles Mackay’s high score suggests no obvious speculative frenzy, while Philip Fisher’s lower but still positive rating implies it’s a solid business—though not Fisher’s rare ‘exceptional quality.’ Meanwhile, the middle-ground approaches of Schwager, Nelson, and Marks-cycle treat it as a neutral or mid-cycle holding, lacking clear conviction either way. On the other hand, Graham’s near-zero score and Bagehot’s liquidity concerns highlight a fundamental mismatch with value-driven, defensive strategies, while Lynch’s low rating underscores a failure to meet his growth-at-a-reasonable-price standard. The contrast between the cautious optimism of Mackay and Fisher and the outright rejection by Graham or Bagehot underscores whether the stock’s strengths lie in stability or whether its risks are too pronounced for traditional value or liquidity-focused investors.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 71
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 62
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 56
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 43
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 35
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 35
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 26
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 20
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 1
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
32.1%
Net Margin
26.5%
EBITDA Margin
57.6%
ROE
12.5%
ROA
3.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.31
Cash
$2.81B
Total Debt
$93.06B
Current Ratio
0.60
Debt/Equity
1.70
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 28.8.2026 | $0.623 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.623 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.623 |
| 27.2.2026 | $0.623 |
| 26.2.2026 | $0.623 |
| 21.11.2025 | $0.567 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.567 |
| 28.8.2025 | $0.567 |
| 27.8.2025 | $0.567 |
| 2.6.2025 | $0.567 |
| 1.6.2025 | $0.567 |
| 28.2.2025 | $0.567 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$26.37
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$23.24
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Oilprice.com · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Associated Press · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 14.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Reuters · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
NextEra Energy (NEE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NEE currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
NEE's technical score is 24/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.6% of price; Operating margin: 32.1% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.60; Calmar: 0.21 (3y annualized return 6.0% / max drawdown 28.1%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -2.1%.
Yes — NEE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubio Alex | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 85 | -85 | $86.19 |
| Arnaboldi Nicole S | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.7.2026 | 409 | +409 | $88.47 |
| Arnaboldi Nicole S | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.7.2026 | 8,475 | +409 | $88.47 |
| PORGES DAVID L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 52 | +52 | $86.12 |
| Arnaboldi Nicole S | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 63 | +63 | $86.12 |
| CAMAREN JAMES LAWRENCE | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 273 | +273 | $86.12 |
| CAMAREN JAMES LAWRENCE | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 34,683 | +273 | $86.12 |
| PORGES DAVID L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 6,611 | +52 | $86.12 |
| Arnaboldi Nicole S | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,066 | +63 | $86.12 |
| Bolster Brian W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.5.2026 | 1,251 | -1,251 | $95.39 |
| Arnaboldi Nicole S | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.4.2026 | 392 | +392 | $92.73 |
| Arnaboldi Nicole S | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.4.2026 | 8,003 | +392 | $92.73 |
| Gough William John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.3.2026 | 93 | -93 | $92.53 |
| Bolster Brian W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.3.2026 | 428 | -428 | $92.53 |
| May James Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.3.2026 | 316 | -316 | $92.53 |
| May James Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.3.2026 | 26,403 | -316 | $92.53 |
| Bolster Brian W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.3.2026 | 46,020 | -428 | $92.53 |
| Gough William John | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.3.2026 | 10,864 | -93 | $92.53 |
| Arnaboldi Nicole S | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.3.2026 | 47 | +47 | $92.82 |
| PORGES DAVID L | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.3.2026 | 41 | +41 | $92.82 |
| CAMAREN JAMES LAWRENCE | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.3.2026 | 218 | +218 | $92.82 |
| CAMAREN JAMES LAWRENCE | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.3.2026 | 34,410 | +218 | $92.82 |
| PORGES DAVID L | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.3.2026 | 6,559 | +41 | $92.82 |
| Arnaboldi Nicole S | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.3.2026 | 7,611 | +47 | $92.82 |
| Daggs Nicole J | Open Market Sale | 13.3.2026 | 4,189 | -4,189 | $93.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
49,839,373 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 63,143,539 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 54.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology