Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$14.83
▼ $0.02 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:45 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$10.58B
Day Range
$14.83 - $14.87
52-Week Range
$12.90 - $17.65
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$14.62
Resistance
$14.88
AES is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+18.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 65.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$33.03 vs. price $14.83 (-322.7%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
91/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
93/100
Analog Quality
+0.0%
Median 40D Outcome
75/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+1.3% … +8.1%
🟡 Base
33%
-0.5% … +0.0%
🔴 Bearish
27%
-6.5% … -3.9%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.0%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
2 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (15%–58%) | +0.1% | -0.3% … +2.2% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 27% (11%–52%) | -0.4% | -1.5% … +0.7% | +0.5% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.0% | -1.2% … +1.3% | +0.9% |
| 40D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.0% | -3.2% … +2.6% | +1.1% |
| 60D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.6% | -2.0% … +2.4% | +1.5% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-08 | 91/100 | Consolidation | -0.5% | +0.6% |
| 2026-06-23 | 91/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.1% | +1.0% |
| 2026-05-22 | 87/100 | Uptrend | +0.1% | +0.1% |
| 2021-09-16 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +0.0% | +0.6% |
| 2017-09-11 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -1.7% | -5.9% |
| 2017-12-11 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -0.7% | -0.1% |
| 2017-10-04 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -6.3% | -4.0% |
| 2017-10-19 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -4.6% | -5.0% |
| 2019-10-18 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +12.6% | +24.9% |
| 2018-01-11 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -6.9% | +4.3% |
| 2026-04-23 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +1.3% | +2.2% |
| 2021-10-15 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.3% | -4.4% |
| 2020-09-14 | 77/100 | Uptrend | +8.7% | +18.1% |
| 2026-04-02 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -0.1% | +2.5% |
| 2025-12-26 | 74/100 | Consolidation | +6.0% | -0.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLU (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
55
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🔎 What Changed (vs. 30 days ago)
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
24d ago · $14.73
Evidence: 7 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
25d ago · $14.75
Evidence: 6 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
26d ago · $14.77
Evidence: 7 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $14.77
Evidence: 7 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $14.77
Evidence: 6 bullish / 5 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
30d ago · $14.74
Evidence: 6 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $14.75
Evidence: 5 bullish / 5 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
53
$14.75
Now
56
$14.83
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
No data available
Value
43
Momentum
73
Risk
42
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
48
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING AES...
Recent media coverage of AES Corporation has primarily focused on its **upcoming merger with Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) and EQT Infrastructure**, which received CFIUS approval in August 2026. The deal, valued at $15 per share, is subject to further regulatory approvals and expected to close late 2026 or early 2027. Additionally, AES has been positioned as a utility/electrification stock benefiting from broader solar market trends, with its stock showing slight gains following earnings reports.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AES Corporation. News trend score: 80. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
96
Fundamentals
48
Technical
73
Valuation
43
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AES’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, as traders appear fixated on the 0.6% resistance gap, ignoring divergent fundamentals. Confirmation bias and herding are secondary, with investors selectively validating narratives despite stagnant revenue. The absence of panic or euphoria suggests a cautious, momentum-driven environment. The key question: will traders break free from resistance anchors, or will the narrative gap widen further?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:04 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""AES is being acquired by BlackRock’s GIP and EQT-led consortium for $15 per share""
""AES Secures CFIUS Approval for Horizon Parent Merger""
""The AES Corporation trades at $14.75 vs. $15.00 take-private offer... Spread Plus Dividend Still Pays 10.7% Annualized""
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for AES reflects deep philosophical divides among these methodologies. Morgan Housel’s near-perfect score highlights his focus on patient, long-term compounding—where AES’s steady fundamentals might align with his preference for quiet, durable businesses. In contrast, Peter Lynch’s zero score underscores his strict ‘growth at a reasonable price’ rule, suggesting AES lacks the explosive upside or valuation tailwinds he sought. Meanwhile, the middle-ground approaches—like Howard Marks’ mixed verdict or Benjamin Graham’s defensive failure—point to nuanced concerns: Graham’s strict valuation discipline clashes with AES’s perceived risk, while Marks questions whether the stock’s strengths are already priced in. The lowest scores from Veblen, Schwager, and Bagehot reveal warnings about speculative overreach, liquidity risks, or lack of disciplined trading setups, while Mackay’s crowd-excitement flag hints at potential market-driven hype. The debate hinges on whether AES’s stability (Housel’s ideal) or its perceived speculative or valuation flaws (Lynch/Bagehot) dominate.
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 43
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 40
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 26
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 18
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 7
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 6
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 0
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$14.62
Range Bottom
$14.88
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
18.1%
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
7.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
22.4%
ROA
1.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.26
Cash
$1.38B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.77
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.7.2026 | $0.176 |
| 30.7.2026 | $0.176 |
| 1.5.2026 | $0.176 |
| 30.4.2026 | $0.176 |
| 30.1.2026 | $0.176 |
| 29.1.2026 | $0.176 |
| 31.10.2025 | $0.176 |
| 30.10.2025 | $0.176 |
| 1.8.2025 | $0.176 |
| 31.7.2025 | $0.176 |
| 1.5.2025 | $0.176 |
| 30.4.2025 | $0.176 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$14.83
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$33.03
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-322.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-1.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.0% | $-1.61B | $-1.47B |
| 2 | -0.1% | $-1.60B | $-1.35B |
| 3 | 0.7% | $-1.62B | $-1.25B |
| 4 | 1.6% | $-1.64B | $-1.16B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-1.68B | $-1.09B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-1.62B
Terminal Value
$-26.55B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-17.25B
Enterprise Value
$-23.58B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-23.58B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.69
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.35
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 11 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Morningstar Research · 6.8.2026
AES Corporation (AES) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AES currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AES's estimated fair value is -$33.03, which is 322.7% below the current price of $14.83. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AES's technical score is 73/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 65.0%; ATR: 0.3% of price; Return on equity (ROE): 22.4% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$33.03 vs. price $14.83 (-322.7%); Current ratio: 0.77; Calmar: -0.07 (3y annualized return -4.0% / max drawdown 55.8%).
Yes — AES has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AES CORP | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 10,066,414 | -10,066,414 | $21.00 |
| AES CORP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 15.5.2026 | 10,066,414 | -10,066,414 | — |
| AES CORP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 15.5.2026 | 10,066,414 | +10,066,414 | — |
| Laulis Julia M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 12,111 | +12,111 | — |
| DAVIDSON JANET | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 2,076 | +2,076 | $14.45 |
| DAVIDSON JANET | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 12,111 | +12,111 | — |
| Naim Moises | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 12,111 | +12,111 | — |
| Naim Moises | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 6,920 | +6,920 | $14.45 |
| ANDERSON GERARD M | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 6,920 | +6,920 | $14.45 |
| ANDERSON GERARD M | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 12,111 | +12,111 | — |
| Sebastian Teresa Mosley | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 12,111 | +12,111 | — |
| MONIE ALAIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 12,111 | +12,111 | — |
| KOEPPEL HOLLY K | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 12,111 | +12,111 | — |
| Bhandari Inderpal S | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 12,111 | +12,111 | — |
| Sebastian Teresa Mosley | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 64,612 | +12,111 | — |
| Naim Moises | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 218,738 | +6,920 | $14.45 |
| Naim Moises | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 230,849 | +12,111 | — |
| Laulis Julia M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 109,189 | +12,111 | — |
| Bhandari Inderpal S | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 59,433 | +12,111 | — |
| ANDERSON GERARD M | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 49,926 | +6,920 | $14.45 |
| ANDERSON GERARD M | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 62,037 | +12,111 | — |
| KOEPPEL HOLLY K | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 195,412 | +12,111 | — |
| DAVIDSON JANET | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 93,247 | +2,076 | $14.45 |
| DAVIDSON JANET | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 105,358 | +12,111 | — |
| MONIE ALAIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 131,814 | +12,111 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
17,454,737 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 20,546,024 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 38.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology