Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$21.84
▼ $0.06 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 10:04 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$21.71 - $21.91
52-Week Range
$15.61 - $25.71
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$21.51
Resistance
$25.71
HST is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+24.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $30.58 vs. price $21.84 (+40.0%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 10.2% / max drawdown 40.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
86/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
-3.9%
Median 40D Outcome
70/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
33%
+5.5% … +9.8%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
67%
-5.6% … -2.6%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 33% (95% CI 15%–58%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -2.4%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
7 occurrence(s) · 29% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.3% | -1.1% … +3.1% | +0.1% |
| 10D | 33% (15%–58%) | +0.3% | -2.0% … +2.7% | +0.2% |
| 20D | 33% (15%–58%) | -2.4% | -3.9% … +3.4% | +0.4% |
| 40D | 27% (11%–52%) | -3.9% | -6.1% … +0.6% | +1.2% |
| 60D | 33% (15%–58%) | -4.4% | -9.9% … +6.2% | +1.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-04 | 86/100 | Consolidation | -1.8% | -2.0% |
| 2024-06-26 | 84/100 | Downtrend | -3.8% | +4.9% |
| 2018-04-10 | 83/100 | Downtrend | +9.8% | +15.7% |
| 2025-11-04 | 82/100 | Consolidation | +10.0% | +16.3% |
| 2024-05-06 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -4.0% | -10.8% |
| 2017-07-24 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -3.3% | +7.6% |
| 2024-05-20 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -2.4% | -10.6% |
| 2019-04-25 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +1.3% | -7.6% |
| 2019-06-27 | 80/100 | Downtrend | -2.2% | -4.4% |
| 2018-03-22 | 80/100 | Downtrend | +5.5% | +15.1% |
| 2019-07-15 | 80/100 | Downtrend | -10.0% | -9.3% |
| 2019-05-09 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.5% | -12.7% |
| 2024-11-14 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +6.4% | -6.0% |
| 2025-01-28 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -6.1% | -18.3% |
| 2024-07-11 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -9.1% | +0.0% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLRE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
53
Quality
63
Value
62
Momentum
38
Risk
56
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
63
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING HST...
Recent coverage of Host Hotels & Resorts has centered on its financial performance and valuation. Analysts note a strong share‑price run and a recent $0.20 quarterly dividend, while Truist raised its price target to $27 and kept a Buy rating. Investment commentary highlights rising demand for upscale lodging, the REIT’s trophy‑grade assets, disciplined capital allocation and solid cash‑flow generation, with upcoming Q3 earnings and earnings‑call announcements also featured.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Host Hotels & Resorts. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
63
Technical
38
Valuation
62
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-13%
Market Narrative
50
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior reflects traders’ focus on the 2.4% support level, despite extreme positive sentiment (100/100) failing to drive momentum or volume. The disconnect between sentiment and valuation (-28% vs. DCF) suggests euphoria is absent, while low panic and herding scores imply no panic-driven selling or peer-driven flows. The key question: will traders break free from the support anchor, or will the gap between narrative (optimism) and reality (undervaluation) widen further?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:04 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"HST's strong demand, disciplined capital recycling, flexible balance sheet and dividend payouts support its case for portfolio gains."
"Host Hotels (HST) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
"Is Host Hotels & Resorts (HST) a Great Value Stock Right Now?"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 1/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent verdicts reflect stark contrasts between methodologies prioritizing cyclical positioning and those demanding fundamental or qualitative rigor. Nelson and Bagehot’s high scores suggest a cyclical or balance-sheet blind spot—Nelson sees it as oversold, while Bagehot’s lack of data prevents any real assessment. Meanwhile, Graham’s strict valuation tests and Fisher’s growth-quality demands drag the score down, as neither framework finds clear evidence of undervaluation or standout fundamentals. The middle-ground approaches—Marks, Loeb, and Housel—balance risk and reward cautiously, while Livermore’s outright rejection highlights a clear trend misalignment. The divide underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in timing (Nelson, Schwager) or deeper structural merits (Fisher, Graham), with efficient-market skeptics like Malkiel and Bogle dismissing it as unexceptional.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 85
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 78
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 75
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 74
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 71
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 64
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 60
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 58
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 40
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 37
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 1
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
14.0%
Net Margin
12.5%
EBITDA Margin
27.0%
ROE
11.7%
ROA
5.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.11
Cash
$768.00M
Total Debt
$1.27B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.19
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.920 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.920 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.350 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.350 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.200 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.200 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.200 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.200 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.200 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.200 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$21.84
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$30.58
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+40.0%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
7.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.6% | $1.32B | $1.21B |
| 2 | 6.3% | $1.41B | $1.18B |
| 3 | 5.1% | $1.48B | $1.14B |
| 4 | 3.8% | $1.53B | $1.09B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.57B | $1.02B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.23B
Terminal Value
$24.76B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$16.09B
Enterprise Value
$21.73B
Net Debt
$506.00M
Equity Value
$21.23B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.45
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.45
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Host Hotels & Resorts (HST) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HST currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, HST's estimated fair value is $30.58, which is 40.0% above the current price of $21.84. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
HST's technical score is 38/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $30.58 vs. price $21.84 (+40.0%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 2.0% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 10.2% / max drawdown 40.0%); Free cash flow growth: -0.8%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — HST has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LENTZ MICHAEL E | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 274,779 | -56,757 | $23.26 |
| LENTZ MICHAEL E | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 56,757 | -56,757 | $23.26 |
| TYRRELL NATHAN S | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 4,300 | -4,300 | — |
| TYRRELL NATHAN S | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $23.00 |
| TYRRELL NATHAN S | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 33,882 | -33,882 | $23.25 |
| Preusse Mary Hogan | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 4,133.262 | +4,133.262 | — |
| BAGLIVO MARY | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 3,713.489 | +3,713.489 | — |
| Smith Gordon H | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 6,651.561 | +6,651.561 | — |
| Stein A William | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 4,085.655 | +4,085.655 | — |
| LAING DIANA | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 1,901.283 | +1,901.283 | — |
| BAGLIVO MARY | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 19,782 | +3,713 | — |
| LAING DIANA | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 6,345 | +1,901 | — |
| Preusse Mary Hogan | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 21,027 | +4,133 | — |
| Smith Gordon H | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 48,371 | +6,652 | — |
| Stein A William | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 20,566 | +4,086 | — |
| TYRRELL NATHAN S | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 15,569 | -15,569 | $23.00 |
| RAKOWICH WALTER C | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 3,408 | -3,408 | $22.90 |
| RAKOWICH WALTER C | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 76,537 | -3,408 | $22.90 |
| TYRRELL NATHAN S | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 682,089 | -15,569 | $23.00 |
| BULLS HERMAN E | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 8,520 | +8,520 | — |
| BAGLIVO MARY | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 8,520.179 | +8,520.179 | — |
| RAKOWICH WALTER C | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 8,520 | +8,520 | — |
| Stein A William | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 8,520.179 | +8,520.179 | — |
| LAING DIANA | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 8,520.179 | +8,520.179 | — |
| Smith Gordon H | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 8,520.179 | +8,520.179 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
39,276,476 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 43,497,918 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology