Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$144.23
▼ $1.24 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:46 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$75.65B
Day Range
$143.96 - $145.68
52-Week Range
$101.59 - $154.16
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$132.55
Resistance
$154.16
EOG is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+21.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.14 (3y annualized return 3.8% / max drawdown 26.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
85/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
92/100
Analog Quality
+4.2%
Median 40D Outcome
60/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+3.4% … +12.1%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.3% … -0.3%
🔴 Bearish
47%
-8.3% … -3.6%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -0.3%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
4 occurrence(s) · 25% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
3 occurrence(s) · 33% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (15%–58%) | -1.3% | -2.8% … +4.0% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 27% (11%–52%) | -1.1% | -3.6% … +1.1% | +0.4% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.3% | -5.1% … +5.9% | +0.6% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +4.2% | -5.3% … +5.7% | +0.8% |
| 60D | 27% (11%–52%) | +0.0% | -9.3% … +3.5% | +1.0% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-08 | 85/100 | Consolidation | -5.9% | -12.9% |
| 2022-04-21 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.8% | -13.3% |
| 2017-12-18 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +14.3% | +0.5% |
| 2024-05-07 | 82/100 | Consolidation | -7.6% | -5.6% |
| 2018-06-08 | 81/100 | Uptrend | +7.2% | +0.0% |
| 2017-12-04 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +9.8% | +0.4% |
| 2025-09-24 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -9.0% | -12.1% |
| 2021-11-17 | 79/100 | Uptrend | -4.3% | +25.9% |
| 2022-02-25 | 79/100 | Uptrend | +16.1% | +19.4% |
| 2026-05-12 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +4.6% | +0.5% |
| 2025-02-28 | 79/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.3% | -12.4% |
| 2026-06-11 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +2.3% | +6.5% |
| 2021-06-29 | 78/100 | Uptrend | -10.9% | -6.6% |
| 2024-12-05 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -2.8% | -6.0% |
| 2026-05-28 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -1.5% | +11.6% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
33
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
78
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING EOG...
Recent media coverage of EOG Resources has primarily focused on its stock performance and analyst reactions following its earnings report. The company’s shares rose 11% after earnings, though its overall performance has lagged behind peers over the past year. Analysts, including Seaport Global (Neutral) and Bernstein (Market Perform), maintain cautious but not overly optimistic outlooks, citing mixed industry dynamics and geopolitical factors like Strait of Hormuz disruptions boosting oil prices. No major operational or strategic shifts were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about EOG Resources. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
44
Fundamentals
78
Technical
33
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+11%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
EOG’s psychology is dominated by **anchoring**, as traders appear fixated on the 4.0% resistance gap, despite weak momentum and neutral sentiment. The narrative-reality gap (-4) hints at mild misalignment, but no extreme bias is evident. The absence of herding or panic suggests a cautious, non-emotional stance. The key question: *Will traders break the resistance anchor, or will the stock consolidate near it?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 01:31 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wall Street analysts remain moderately optimistic about the stock’s prospects"
"EOG Resources (EOG) reported earnings 30 days ago... stock is up 11%"
"Seaport Global initiates coverage on EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) with a Neutral rating"
"Strait of Hormuz disruptions push crude prices higher"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 30/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for EOG split sharply between those emphasizing long-term fundamentals and patient holding versus those skeptical of its fit for their strict criteria. Mackay, Marks, Housel, and Smith—all valuing stability, risk management, and compounding—see EOG as a solid, low-mania candidate, with Smith and Housel even calling it a ‘buy-and-hold’ pick. However, Fisher and Graham’s value-quality frameworks downgrade it for lacking exceptional growth or margin-of-safety clarity, while Livermore and Schwager’s trend-following and disciplined-setup rules outright reject it as either counter-trend or unstructured. The divide highlights whether EOG’s steady performance aligns with a ‘quiet compounder’ philosophy (like Housel’s) or fails to meet the sharper edges of contrarian or growth-focused tests (like Veblen’s or Lynch’s).
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 85
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 66
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 61
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 61
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 54
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 52
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 35
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 33
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 30
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
83.1%
Operating Margin
28.2%
Net Margin
22.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
16.7%
ROA
9.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.17
Cash
$3.40B
Total Debt
$7.94B
Current Ratio
1.63
Debt/Equity
0.27
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.7.2026 | $1.020 |
| 16.7.2026 | $1.020 |
| 16.4.2026 | $1.020 |
| 15.4.2026 | $1.020 |
| 16.1.2026 | $1.020 |
| 15.1.2026 | $1.020 |
| 17.10.2025 | $1.020 |
| 16.10.2025 | $1.020 |
| 17.7.2025 | $0.975 |
| 16.7.2025 | $0.975 |
| 16.4.2025 | $0.975 |
| 15.4.2025 | $0.975 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$55.49
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$42.16
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
ChartMill · 14.9.2026
CNBC · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
EOG Resources (EOG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EOG currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
EOG's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.27; Current ratio: 1.63.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.14 (3y annualized return 3.8% / max drawdown 26.3%); Revenue growth (last year): -4.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -18.9%.
Yes — EOG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distefano Laura B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 974 | -974 | $148.35 |
| Yacob Ezra Y | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 35,942 | -35,942 | $152.10 |
| Yacob Ezra Y | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 242,451 | -35,942 | $152.10 |
| Kerr Michael T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 365.307 | +365.307 | $148.69 |
| GAUT C CHRISTOPHER | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 143.223 | +143.223 | $148.69 |
| DANIELS ROBERT P | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 446.402 | +446.402 | $148.69 |
| CRISP CHARLES R | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 282.602 | +282.602 | $148.69 |
| Donaldson Michael P | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 147.844 | +147.844 | $148.69 |
| Dugle Lynn A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 41.935 | +41.935 | $148.69 |
| Leitzell Jeffrey R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 4.17 | +4.17 | $148.69 |
| Yacob Ezra Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 2.401 | +2.401 | $148.69 |
| CLARK JANET F | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 314.273 | +314.273 | $148.69 |
| CRISP CHARLES R | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 63,443 | +283 | $148.69 |
| GAUT C CHRISTOPHER | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 23,063 | +143 | $148.69 |
| CLARK JANET F | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 49,555 | +314 | $148.69 |
| DANIELS ROBERT P | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 35,199 | +446 | $148.69 |
| Donaldson Michael P | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 107,894 | +148 | $148.69 |
| Dugle Lynn A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 7,696 | +42 | $148.69 |
| Yacob Ezra Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 278,393 | +2 | $148.69 |
| Kerr Michael T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 23,296 | +365 | $148.69 |
| Leitzell Jeffrey R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 88,054 | +4 | $148.69 |
| Donaldson Michael P | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 233.056 | +233.056 | $91.18 |
| Janssen Ann D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 233.056 | +233.056 | $91.18 |
| Yacob Ezra Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 162.883 | +162.883 | $91.18 |
| Donaldson Michael P | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 107,746 | +233 | $91.18 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
14,772,531 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 16,227,747 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology