Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$213.48
▼ $2.81 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:44 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$124.11B
Day Range
$212.45 - $215.14
52-Week Range
$189.20 - $248.17
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$203.08
Resistance
$235.00
PGR is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
-11.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $687.96 vs. price $213.48 (+222.3%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 14.4% / max drawdown 34.6%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
81/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
-0.2%
Median 40D Outcome
69/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+1.7% … +8.8%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.7% … -0.1%
🔴 Bearish
47%
-9.1% … -2.4%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -1.0%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
6 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +1.0% | -0.9% … +2.3% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.3% | -1.3% … +3.3% | +0.8% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.0% | -5.1% … +1.8% | +1.3% |
| 40D | 33% (15%–58%) | -0.2% | -6.0% … +3.8% | +2.4% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -2.1% | -6.5% … +3.3% | +4.7% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-16 | 81/100 | Downtrend | -1.6% | +2.8% |
| 2021-11-22 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +10.0% | +14.3% |
| 2021-09-14 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -2.9% | +2.1% |
| 2021-07-21 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +1.7% | -4.3% |
| 2019-12-19 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +7.5% | +1.5% |
| 2023-06-05 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +1.9% | +3.9% |
| 2025-09-09 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +0.3% | -6.6% |
| 2025-09-24 | 75/100 | Downtrend | -7.2% | -6.3% |
| 2025-01-13 | 75/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +9.2% | +14.6% |
| 2023-06-20 | 74/100 | Consolidation | -8.7% | +7.8% |
| 2019-09-17 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +1.3% | -3.9% |
| 2019-08-20 | 73/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -2.0% | -6.6% |
| 2021-06-22 | 73/100 | Consolidation | -1.0% | -2.1% |
| 2025-10-10 | 72/100 | Downtrend | -9.5% | -12.9% |
| 2025-06-13 | 71/100 | Consolidation | -9.6% | -8.0% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 29, 2026
Then
71
$218.64
Now
62
$213.48
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
55
Value
67
Momentum
39
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
64
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING PGR...
Recent media coverage of Progressive Corporation (PGR) has primarily focused on its stock performance and market positioning within the insurance sector. Headlines highlight Progressive outperforming broader market trends, with its shares rising slightly in recent trading days. The company is also noted among insurers engaging in increased stock buybacks amid softer pricing conditions, reflecting efforts to bolster shareholder value. Additionally, Progressive is mentioned in discussions about intensified competition in the personal auto insurance market, though no specific company developments beyond general industry trends are detailed.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Progressive Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
38
Fundamentals
64
Technical
39
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
48
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are aligning PGR’s movement with peers, likely due to shared market conditions or sector-specific triggers. The narrative gap (9 points) hints at a disconnect between positive news (100/100) and price performance, which may reinforce herd-like behavior rather than individual conviction. Low FOMO and anchoring near resistance imply traders are cautious, possibly waiting for confirmation before acting. The key question is whether this synchronization reflects a rational response to fundamentals or a temporary alignment that could break under new catalysts.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:07 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Progressive (PGR) stood at $223.91, denoting a +1.14% move from the preceding trading day."
"Stock buybacks among P&C insurers could be coming just in time to help support earnings."
"Why Short Sellers Are Running Scared from These Stocks"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 28/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented and value/cycle-sensitive methodologies. Peter Lynch and Edgar Lawrence Smith, both bullish on high-growth potential, rate it near the top, praising its underpriced growth or long-term hold potential. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s Defensive and Enterprising Investor models clash dramatically—one sees it as a cautious value play, while the other dismisses it as too expensive for aggressive risk-takers. The middle ground is occupied by patient compounders like Morgan Housel and Gerald Loeb, who acknowledge its merits but temper enthusiasm with caution, while market-cycle analysts like Howard Marks and Jesse Livermore see it as either overvalued or out of sync with broader trends. Even the efficient-market camp and Jack Schwager’s disciplined wizards reject it outright, suggesting the stock’s appeal is either overstated or lacks a clear edge.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 94
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 94
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 90
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 88
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 74
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 71
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 54
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 42
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 28
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$203.08
Range Bottom
$235.00
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
12.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
37.3%
ROA
9.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$19.29
Cash
$138.00M
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.00
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.7.2026 | $0.100 |
| 1.7.2026 | $0.100 |
| 2.4.2026 | $0.100 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.100 |
| 2.1.2026 | $13.600 |
| 1.1.2026 | $13.600 |
| 2.10.2025 | $0.100 |
| 1.10.2025 | $0.100 |
| 3.7.2025 | $0.100 |
| 2.7.2025 | $0.100 |
| 3.4.2025 | $0.100 |
| 2.4.2025 | $0.100 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$213.48
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$687.96
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+222.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
21.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.0% | $20.80B | $19.09B |
| 2 | 16.3% | $24.20B | $20.37B |
| 3 | 11.7% | $27.04B | $20.88B |
| 4 | 7.1% | $28.97B | $20.52B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $29.69B | $19.30B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$17.20B
Terminal Value
$468.19B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$304.29B
Enterprise Value
$404.45B
Net Debt
$-138.00M
Equity Value
$404.59B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$51.56
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$51.56
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Progressive Corporation (PGR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PGR currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, PGR's estimated fair value is $687.96, which is 222.3% above the current price of $213.48. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
PGR's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $687.96 vs. price $213.48 (+222.3%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 33.5%; Net income growth: 33.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 14.4% / max drawdown 34.6%); Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — PGR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 14 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Griffith Susan Patricia | Gift | 1.9.2026 | 1,598 | -1,598 | — |
| Griffith Susan Patricia | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 37,338 | -37,338 | $219.50 |
| Broz Steven | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 1,225 | -1,225 | $219.40 |
| Broz Steven | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 31,257 | -1,225 | $219.40 |
| Niederst Lori A | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 7,339 | -7,339 | $209.29 |
| Quigg Andrew J | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 3,499 | -3,499 | $220.00 |
| Quigg Andrew J | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 42,595 | -3,499 | $220.00 |
| Bailo Karen | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 8,452 | -8,452 | $212.71 |
| Murphy John Jo | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 8,124 | -8,124 | $212.70 |
| Bauer Jonathan S. | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 2,242 | -2,242 | $212.71 |
| Griffith Susan Patricia | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 37,338 | -37,338 | $212.71 |
| Griffith Susan Patricia | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 522,776 | -37,338 | $212.71 |
| Murphy John Jo | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 41,291 | -8,124 | $212.70 |
| Bauer Jonathan S. | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 26,250 | -2,242 | $212.71 |
| Bailo Karen | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 32,348 | -8,452 | $212.71 |
| DAY HEATHER E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 613 | -613 | $211.90 |
| Clawson William L. II | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 4,136 | -4,136 | $211.90 |
| Niederst Lori A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 5,812 | -5,812 | $211.90 |
| Griffith Susan Patricia | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 58,919 | -58,919 | $211.90 |
| WITALEC DANIEL J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 706 | -706 | $211.90 |
| Murphy John Jo | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 6,404 | -6,404 | $211.90 |
| Stringer David M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 235 | -235 | $211.90 |
| DAY HEATHER E | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 2,087.816 | +2,087.816 | — |
| Clawson William L. II | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 9,603.053 | +9,603.053 | — |
| Quigg Andrew J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 5,526 | -5,526 | $211.90 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,039,944 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,075,469 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology