Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$432.03
▼ $2.59 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:05 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$24.46B
Day Range
$423.82 - $439.83
52-Week Range
$223.76 - $439.83
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$366.93
Resistance
$439.83
FFIV is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+30.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 23/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 23.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $256.12 vs. price $432.03 (-40.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (73/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
80/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
+4.6%
Median 40D Outcome
56/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+4.3% … +9.3%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.4% … +0.3%
🔴 Bearish
33%
-11.7% … -4.5%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 40 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +2.5%.
No major conflicts found.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
14 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 20% (7%–45%) | -0.3% | -3.4% … +0.7% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.3% | -3.8% … +2.3% | +0.8% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.5% | -4.2% … +7.2% | +1.4% |
| 40D | 67% (42%–85%) | +4.6% | -3.5% … +9.5% | +3.1% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.9% | -8.1% … +19.6% | +3.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-19 | 80/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +8.5% | +11.4% |
| 2020-07-23 | 80/100 | Uptrend | -13.2% | -14.2% |
| 2026-05-06 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +19.8% | +19.2% |
| 2018-02-27 | 76/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -3.9% | +15.7% |
| 2021-08-04 | 76/100 | Uptrend | -4.5% | +0.7% |
| 2021-11-03 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +2.5% | -6.5% |
| 2024-11-13 | 75/100 | Uptrend | +6.0% | +25.8% |
| 2024-09-20 | 75/100 | Uptrend | -0.8% | +20.1% |
| 2018-05-04 | 75/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +4.8% | +1.9% |
| 2018-11-08 | 74/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -11.7% | -15.6% |
| 2026-06-03 | 74/100 | Uptrend | +0.6% | -2.8% |
| 2021-04-01 | 74/100 | Uptrend | -11.5% | -9.7% |
| 2025-08-13 | 73/100 | Uptrend | +2.7% | -23.8% |
| 2024-08-21 | 71/100 | Uptrend | +9.1% | +21.4% |
| 2026-04-07 | 69/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +10.0% | +32.0% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
73
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $423.59
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 58)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 16, 2026
Then
72
$430.88
Now
73
$432.03
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
73
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
88
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
80
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING FFIV...
Recent media coverage of F5, Inc. (FFIV) has centered on its financial strength and strategic positioning in AI-driven infrastructure. Analysts highlight its robust quality metrics—such as a 76.6% return on invested capital, zero debt, and strong cash flow—as attractive for investors. The company’s Q2 earnings were discussed in comparison to peers in the content delivery sector, while a notable partnership with MuleSoft (Salesforce) introduced AI Guardrails for securing AI applications, emphasizing F5’s focus on governance and security in emerging AI technologies.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about F5, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
54
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
64
Fundamentals
80
Technical
88
Valuation
33
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+12%
Market Narrative
87
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+45
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant **overconfidence** bias, as price momentum significantly outpaces fundamental growth and valuation is substantially above intrinsic estimates. The **euphoria** score also signals early optimism, though herding appears cautious given today’s underperformance relative to peers. The **narrative gap** (29-point divergence) hints at a disconnect between market enthusiasm and underlying fundamentals. Key question: Will momentum sustain despite the valuation premium, or will reality temper overconfidence?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:48 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"F5 announced a technology integration with MuleSoft... bringing F5 AI Guardrails... for centralized policy enforcement and real-time protection against AI risks."
"F5 Inc. (FFIV) passes the Caviar Cruise quality screen with 76.6% ROIC, zero debt, strong cash conversion, and solid growth."
"F5 shares plummeted alongside peers due to escalating geopolitical tensions and rising bond yields."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 71/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with some seeing it as a promising opportunity while others flag significant red flags. The highest-scoring models—Samuel Armstrong Nelson (74) and Thorstein Veblen (70)—suggest it’s either near an oversold cycle bottom or aligned with real economic growth, implying a tactical or long-term buy. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher (66) and Charles Mackay (65) lean positive but tempered, with Fisher noting it’s solid but not exceptional and Mackay detecting early crowd enthusiasm. However, the middle tier—from Peter Lynch (57) to Howard Marks (41)—cautions that while growth or business quality exists, the stock may already price it in or carry elevated risk. The bottom half, dominated by Graham (7) and Livermore (42), slams it outright: Graham dismisses it as too risky for his defensive standards, while Livermore and Schwager (34) see it as a trend bet or a no-go for disciplined trading. The contrast reflects a spectrum from cyclical optimism to structural skepticism—some models prioritize timing or sentiment, while others demand margin of safety or trend alignment.
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 71
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 66
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 64
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 62
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 60
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 58
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 35
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 27
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 23
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 21
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 19
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 8
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$366.93
Range Bottom
$439.83
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
81.4%
Operating Margin
24.8%
Net Margin
22.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
19.3%
ROA
11.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$11.96
Cash
$1.34B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.56
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$432.03
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$256.12
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-40.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.7% | $949.05M | $870.69M |
| 2 | 4.2% | $988.47M | $831.97M |
| 3 | 3.6% | $1.02B | $790.77M |
| 4 | 3.1% | $1.06B | $747.62M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.08B | $703.03M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$906.41M
Terminal Value
$17.06B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$11.09B
Enterprise Value
$15.03B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$15.03B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$62.27
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$60.60
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 7 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Investor's Business Daily · 18.9.2026
StockStory · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Business Wire · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
MT Newswires · 16.9.2026
Business Wire · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Business Wire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
F5, Inc. (FFIV) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 73/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FFIV currently scores 73/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, FFIV's estimated fair value is $256.12, which is 40.7% below the current price of $432.03. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
FFIV's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 23.6%; Net income growth: 22.2%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $256.12 vs. price $432.03 (-40.7%); P/E: 35.7; %K 85.8 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for FFIV.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 24 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison John Anthony | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 204 | -204 | $406.24 |
| MONTOYA MICHAEL F | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 80 | -80 | $414.18 |
| MONTOYA MICHAEL F | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 440 | -440 | $413.31 |
| MONTOYA MICHAEL F | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 1,173 | -1,173 | $411.50 |
| MONTOYA MICHAEL F | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 1,296 | -1,296 | $406.24 |
| MONTOYA MICHAEL F | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 920 | -920 | $412.38 |
| MONTOYA MICHAEL F | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 277 | -277 | $410.37 |
| MONTOYA MICHAEL F | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 240 | -240 | $408.96 |
| OKEKE ANGELIQUE M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 3,002 | +3,002 | — |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 642 | -642 | $411.82 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 320 | -320 | $414.10 |
| FOUNTAIN THOMAS DEAN | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,208 | -1,208 | $414.63 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 200 | -200 | $415.97 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 40 | -40 | $416.83 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 200 | -200 | $409.68 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 996 | -996 | $412.90 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 284 | -284 | $415.03 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,100 | -1,100 | $410.94 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 150,571 | -200 | $409.68 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 149,471 | -1,100 | $410.94 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 148,829 | -642 | $411.82 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 147,833 | -996 | $412.90 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 147,513 | -320 | $414.10 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 147,229 | -284 | $415.03 |
| Locoh-Donou Francois | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 147,029 | -200 | $415.97 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,567,256 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,409,686 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology