Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$111.84
▼ $1.06 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:20 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$49.77B
Day Range
$111.26 - $113.63
52-Week Range
$78.03 - $119.31
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$99.85
Resistance
$118.13
EBAY is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+24.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 44.0% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $52.72 vs. price $111.84 (-52.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
82/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
+7.8%
Median 40D Outcome
60/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
67%
+5.0% … +11.2%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.7% … -0.5%
🔴 Bearish
20%
-12.5% … -7.2%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 67% (95% CI 42%–85%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +4.2%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
12 occurrence(s) · 67% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (15%–58%) | +0.1% | -3.1% … +4.4% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.9% | -2.9% … +4.6% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 67% (42%–85%) | +4.2% | -0.6% … +10.2% | +0.8% |
| 40D | 73% (48%–89%) | +7.8% | +0.9% … +13.8% | +1.6% |
| 60D | 73% (48%–89%) | +9.3% | +0.4% … +16.8% | +3.0% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-09 | 82/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +11.3% | +20.0% |
| 2023-07-21 | 79/100 | Uptrend | -11.1% | -12.1% |
| 2026-03-09 | 77/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +3.3% | +17.1% |
| 2025-05-06 | 77/100 | Uptrend | +9.6% | +30.4% |
| 2025-01-13 | 77/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +4.2% | -5.7% |
| 2025-03-31 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -0.8% | +8.8% |
| 2021-06-02 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +10.7% | +19.3% |
| 2020-12-17 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +7.4% | +11.2% |
| 2024-12-20 | 75/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -0.4% | +1.2% |
| 2026-05-07 | 75/100 | Uptrend | +2.8% | +3.0% |
| 2025-04-22 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +8.3% | +16.5% |
| 2026-04-23 | 75/100 | Uptrend | +13.3% | +9.3% |
| 2025-10-21 | 75/100 | Uptrend | -13.8% | -2.1% |
| 2024-02-29 | 74/100 | Uptrend | +11.6% | +15.1% |
| 2025-01-31 | 74/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -3.3% | -0.4% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
68
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
53
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
85
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
79
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING EBAY...
Recent media coverage of **eBay Inc.** has been sparse but highlights its indirect ties to **GameStop’s financial performance**, particularly the $238 million gain from eBay stock holdings, which temporarily overshadowed GameStop’s declining core retail sales ahead of its earnings report. Additionally, eBay’s stock has faced a **3.9% drop** since its last earnings announcement, with analysts assessing future trends. No direct eBay-specific news dominates, but its role in broader retail and investment discussions remains noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about eBay Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
45
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
54
Fundamentals
79
Technical
85
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+3%
Market Narrative
84
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+47
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
EBAY’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, as traders appear fixated on the 0.4% support level despite a wide narrative gap (72 vs. 37). Overconfidence (45) may stem from the 98% DCF premium, but negative momentum and underperformance vs. EPS growth undermine it. The lack of FOMO (10) or panic (14) suggests traders are cautiously anchored rather than emotionally reactive. The key question: will traders break free from the 0.4% support anchor, or will it hold as a psychological pivot?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:54 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"A Massachusetts man says eBay withheld over $11,000 from his $23,750 truck sale — then told him to hand over the keys"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 69/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for EBAY split sharply between bullish and cautious camps, reflecting starkly different priorities. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-perfect score and favorable cycle positioning suggest he’d see this as a prime opportunity to buy near a bottom, while Edgar Lawrence Smith and Howard Marks (both cycle-focused) also lean bullish, viewing it as a long-term hold or early-cycle play. Conversely, Fisher, Lynch, and Livermore dismiss it outright—Fisher and Lynch because it lacks their signature growth-and-quality traits, while Livermore’s negative trend verdict aligns with his contrarian, trend-following discipline. Meanwhile, Graham’s methods—both defensive and enterprising—reject it entirely for being too expensive or lacking margin of safety, while Bagehot and the efficient-market camp flag liquidity and evidence gaps. The divide underscores whether the stock’s momentum or speculative excitement (noted by Mackay) justifies risk, or if its valuation and trend already price in too much optimism.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 60
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 59
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 45
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 44
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 43
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 41
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 31
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 28
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 28
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 28
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 16
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 9
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 9
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
71.5%
Operating Margin
20.5%
Net Margin
18.3%
EBITDA Margin
24.3%
ROE
44.0%
ROA
11.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.43
Cash
$1.87B
Total Debt
$750.00M
Current Ratio
1.10
Debt/Equity
0.16
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 28.8.2026 | $0.310 |
| 29.5.2026 | $0.310 |
| 28.5.2026 | $0.310 |
| 6.3.2026 | $0.310 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.310 |
| 28.11.2025 | $0.290 |
| 27.11.2025 | $0.290 |
| 29.8.2025 | $0.290 |
| 28.8.2025 | $0.290 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.290 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.290 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.290 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$111.84
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$52.72
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-52.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3% | $1.50B | $1.37B |
| 2 | 3.8% | $1.55B | $1.31B |
| 3 | 3.4% | $1.61B | $1.24B |
| 4 | 2.9% | $1.65B | $1.17B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.69B | $1.10B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.43B
Terminal Value
$26.72B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$17.37B
Enterprise Value
$23.56B
Net Debt
$-1.12B
Equity Value
$24.67B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.86
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.32
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 5 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
eBay Inc. (EBAY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 68/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EBAY currently scores 68/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, EBAY's estimated fair value is $52.72, which is 52.9% below the current price of $111.84. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
EBAY's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 44.0% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.16; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $52.72 vs. price $111.84 (-52.9%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Free cash flow growth: -26.7%.
Yes — EBAY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 19 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 3,778 | -3,778 | $105.02 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 1,050 | -1,050 | $102.06 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 2,214 | -2,214 | $102.85 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 3,258 | -3,258 | $103.82 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 810 | -810 | $105.55 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 2,911 | -2,911 | $104.59 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,596 | -1,596 | $103.14 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,155 | -1,155 | $102.39 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 3,844 | -3,844 | $100.48 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 273 | -273 | $104.95 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,331 | -1,331 | $101.30 |
| Sweetnam Jordan Douglas Bradley | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 1,014 | -1,014 | $101.39 |
| WELLINGTON SAMANTHA | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 970 | -970 | $103.14 |
| Sweetnam Jordan Douglas Bradley | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 2,294 | -2,294 | $103.14 |
| Sweetnam Jordan Douglas Bradley | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 4,321 | +4,321 | — |
| Sweetnam Jordan Douglas Bradley | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 4,321 | -4,321 | — |
| WELLINGTON SAMANTHA | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 1,836 | -1,836 | — |
| WELLINGTON SAMANTHA | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.8.2026 | 1,836 | +1,836 | — |
| SPENCER REBECCA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 646 | -646 | $107.44 |
| SPENCER REBECCA | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 4,544 | -4,544 | $107.84 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 1,943 | -1,943 | $108.27 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 1,449 | -1,449 | $111.27 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 3,424 | -3,424 | $109.20 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 278 | -278 | $112.23 |
| IANNONE JAMIE | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 2,416 | -2,416 | $110.36 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
18,018,529 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 17,374,463 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology