Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$509.77
▲ $0.57 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:16 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$506.13 - $512.07
52-Week Range
$464.01 - $537.74
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.10.2026
Support
$486.06
Resistance
$537.74
BRK.B is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+3.9% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 9/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.3% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Parabolic SAR
Price is below the SAR point — downtrend
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
82/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+4.6%
Median 40D Outcome
80/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
60%
+3.3% … +8.7%
🟡 Base
33%
-0.5% … -0.1%
🔴 Bearish
7%
-3.5% … -3.5%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 60% (95% CI 36%–80%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.8%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
11 occurrence(s) · 55% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
4 occurrence(s) · 75% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -0.8% … +2.2% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.8% | +0.1% … +3.0% | +0.6% |
| 20D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.8% | -0.2% … +6.5% | +1.3% |
| 40D | 67% (42%–85%) | +4.6% | -0.9% … +8.8% | +2.3% |
| 60D | 73% (48%–89%) | +7.0% | +1.4% … +14.2% | +3.3% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-25 | 82/100 | Consolidation | +5.3% | +11.9% |
| 2026-06-22 | 82/100 | Consolidation | +0.2% | +6.4% |
| 2024-10-23 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +1.8% | -0.0% |
| 2024-06-06 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -0.5% | +16.0% |
| 2019-06-26 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.3% | -0.2% |
| 2021-12-06 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +9.6% | +16.5% |
| 2023-04-26 | 78/100 | Uptrend | -0.1% | +9.1% |
| 2025-01-24 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +7.6% | +12.4% |
| 2026-05-20 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +1.8% | +3.6% |
| 2021-12-20 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +8.7% | +19.1% |
| 2023-12-21 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +4.5% | +16.8% |
| 2025-12-02 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -0.8% | -5.2% |
| 2026-02-20 | 76/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.5% | -2.0% |
| 2025-02-21 | 75/100 | Uptrend | +9.0% | +7.0% |
| 2026-06-05 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +3.3% | +2.9% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Berkshire Hathaway Class B (BRK.B) holds an overall investor score of 77, categorized as STRONG, driven primarily by solid technical and news metrics that each score 80, while the risk assessment trails at 58. The technical profile is buoyant: the price sits above both the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, the MACD histogram is positive indicating rising momentum, RSI is in a healthy 52.3 range, and the stochastic %K rests at a neutral 39.4. These signals collectively suggest a stable up‑trend with moderate buying pressure. News sentiment is similarly upbeat, featuring several positive or neutral headlines linked to Warren Buffett and Berkshire’s strategic moves, despite a single negative piece concerning succession risks. The risk side, however, reveals cautionary notes: the Average True Range (ATR) equals 1.3 % of price, indicating modest volatility, and the Calmar ratio stands at 0.75, reflecting a three‑year annual return of 11.2 % against a maximum drawdown of 14.9 %. This lower risk score tempers the overall outlook, highlighting exposure to market swings and drawdown potential. One notable concern is that the price is currently below the SAR indicator, which traditionally flags a downtrend, adding a counterweight to the otherwise positive technical picture. In synthesis, the strong technical momentum and largely favorable news environment elevate the score, but the modest risk metrics and SAR‑derived downside signal keep the overall rating from reaching a higher tier.
The price is above the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, the MACD histogram is positive, RSI is at 52.3, and %K is neutral at 39.4, all indicating healthy upward momentum.
These indicators collectively suggest a stable trend and limited immediate downside pressure.
The news feed contains mostly positive or neutral stories about Warren Buffett and Berkshire's strategic actions, with only one negative article about succession risk.
News sentiment can influence investor confidence and short‑term price movement.
ATR equals 1.3 % of price and the Calmar ratio is 0.75, reflecting a 3‑year annual return of 11.2 % against a maximum drawdown of 14.9 %.
Higher volatility and a lower Calmar ratio indicate greater exposure to price swings and potential losses.
StockIQ conclusion
BRK.B’s investor score reflects strong technical performance and generally positive news coverage, offset by moderate volatility and a downtrend signal from the SAR indicator. While the technical and news factors support a robust outlook, the risk metrics and SAR warning suggest caution. Continued monitoring of price trends, volatility, and news developments will be essential to gauge any shifts in the stock’s risk‑adjusted profile.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
77
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $509.20
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $509.20
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $510.50
Evidence: attention score 60/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $519.80
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $519.80
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $515.01
Evidence: attention score 60/100
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $514.33
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $510.37
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $510.37
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $507.00
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $506.72
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
74
$506.72
Now
77
$509.77
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
80
Risk
58
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING BRK.B...
Recent media coverage of Berkshire Hathaway has centered on its evolving strategies under CEO Greg Abel, particularly its growing focus on artificial intelligence investments and stock concentration. Notable themes include Berkshire’s AI-related opportunities, the dominance of its top five holdings in its portfolio, and Warren Buffett’s legacy—highlighting his frugal lifestyle and the unique structure of Berkshire’s dividend-like ETF payouts. Additionally, comparisons to other financial giants and Buffett’s long-term investment approach have been discussed.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Berkshire Hathaway. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
21
Fundamentals
—
Technical
80
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
58
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a cautious, non-emotional stance with **herding** as the dominant state (33), driven by the stock’s flat performance amid peer declines. **Anchoring** (22) hints at traders fixating on the 3.9% support level, while low FOMO/Euphoria scores (10/7) indicate no urgency or overconfidence. The narrow narrative-reality gap (3 points) implies limited misalignment between sentiment and fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders break from the herd if peers stabilize, or will anchoring keep the stock anchored near support?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:28 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Berkshire Hathaway CEO Greg Abel tells CNBC the company is pursuing AI opportunities on two paths."
"Approximately $226 billion of Berkshire Hathaway's invested assets can be traced to five standout stocks."
"Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) drew fresh attention after CEO Greg Abel detailed the conglomerate's multibillion-dollar Alphabet stake and AI ambitions."
"Strategy Inc. now has more 'Total Reserve Capital' than any other financial-services company in the S&P 500 index except Berkshire Hathaway Inc."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 21D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 36/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Morgan Housel’s documented principles, the model estimates a very high rating (95) for BRK.B and describes it as a quiet compounder suitable for patient holders, while Gerald Loeb’s framework assigns a solid but lower score (72) highlighting a reasonable capital‑preservation profile. In contrast, Charles Mackay’s sentiment‑focused view sees emerging crowd excitement (score 60), Howard Marks flags mixed expectations (score 54), and Jesse Livermore finds no clear trend (score 53), reflecting each methodology’s emphasis on market psychology and timing. The classic value‑oriented approaches of Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, and Veblen all land at the neutral midpoint (score 50) because the specific balance‑sheet, growth, or dividend data required for a definitive read are absent. Meanwhile, the efficiency‑market perspective (score 34), Marks’s cycle lens (score 34), Schwager’s trader discipline (score 19), Smith’s dividend‑growth criteria (score 15), and Nelson’s cycle‑stretch view (score 6) all assign low scores, indicating caution or a preference for an index‑fund approach given their focus on market efficiency, cycle stage, and technical setups.
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 91
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 71
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 56
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 55
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
CNBC · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
CNBC · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for BRK.B specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
BRK.B's technical score is 80/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.3% of price; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BRK.B.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology