Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$568.06
▼ $20.34 (-3.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:59 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$568.06 - $595.51
52-Week Range
$110.22 - $595.51
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$358.88
Resistance
$595.51
DELL is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+330.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 36.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $176.88 vs. price $568.06 (-68.9%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
74/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
87/100
Analog Quality
+8.1%
Median 40D Outcome
0/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+16.7% … +38.9%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.5% … -0.3%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-18.0% … -2.5%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 40 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -0.2%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
12 occurrence(s) · 42% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.5% | -2.3% … +3.7% | +0.9% |
| 10D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.0% | -1.9% … +8.7% | +1.8% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.2% | -3.1% … +20.0% | +3.9% |
| 40D | 67% (42%–85%) | +8.1% | -6.4% … +47.7% | +6.2% |
| 60D | 60% (36%–80%) | +14.3% | -5.1% … +95.2% | +8.1% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | 74/100 | ✓ High Volatility | -0.2% | -2.6% |
| 2026-03-20 | 70/100 | High Volatility | +29.5% | +156.3% |
| 2026-05-14 | 70/100 | High Volatility | +59.6% | +77.9% |
| 2026-03-06 | 68/100 | ✓ High Volatility | +18.2% | +197.2% |
| 2024-05-22 | 67/100 | Uptrend | -1.8% | -24.3% |
| 2026-04-07 | 64/100 | Uptrend | +21.7% | +121.9% |
| 2025-10-09 | 64/100 | Uptrend | -4.3% | -20.5% |
| 2020-07-24 | 63/100 | Uptrend | -0.6% | +14.3% |
| 2026-04-28 | 63/100 | Uptrend | +48.3% | +112.5% |
| 2018-11-23 | 62/100 | Uptrend | -22.5% | -2.4% |
| 2023-09-29 | 62/100 | ✓ High Volatility | -4.3% | +11.8% |
| 2021-03-18 | 62/100 | Uptrend | +15.1% | +16.6% |
| 2021-04-22 | 62/100 | Uptrend | -1.9% | -7.6% |
| 2024-03-11 | 61/100 | High Volatility | +6.8% | +18.8% |
| 2025-10-24 | 60/100 | High Volatility | -22.8% | -26.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
65
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
16d ago · $530.34
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 20 to 50 day-over-day
What happened after
16d ago · $530.34
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 72)
What happened after
16d ago · $530.34
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 11 to 72 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
85
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
41
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING DELL...
Recent media coverage of Dell Technologies has centered on its stock surge, reaching 52-week highs amid strong investor interest. Analysts highlight Dell as a top AI-related buy, praising its momentum and potential to expand its consumer PC market share against competitors like HP and Apple. The company’s growth trajectory, particularly in AI-driven storage and computing solutions, has drawn attention, though some focus remains on broader tech sector trends.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Dell Technologies. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
75
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Investors appear highly excited (75), but evidence of strong fundamental conviction is comparatively weak (42).
Psychology
91
Fundamentals
41
Technical
85
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+39%
Market Narrative
100
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+58
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DELL’s market behavior suggests a dominant FOMO-driven rally, with euphoria and overconfidence reinforcing momentum. The extreme narrative gap (58-point) and overvaluation (+202% DCF) imply detached expectations from fundamentals. Key open question: Will traders sustain momentum despite stretched metrics, or will anchoring near resistance trigger profit-taking? The lack of panic or herding signals suggests confidence remains high, but anchoring could act as a near-term ceiling.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:52 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Dell Stock Jumped 15% Last Week. Here's Why This Top AI Stock Is Still a Buy"
"Why Did DELL... Stocks Surge To 52-Week Highs Last Week?"
"Jim Cramer Explains Why 'Buyers Flocked in' for Dell (DELL)"
"Dell & 2 Momentum Stocks to Buy Now for Explosive Upside"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for DELL reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors weigh risk, valuation, and growth potential. At the top, **Edgar Lawrence Smith** and **Jesse Livermore** see a strong long-term or trend-based case, with Smith’s 'buy-and-hold' optimism contrasting sharply with **Benjamin Graham** and **Howard Marks**, who dismiss it as overvalued or late-cycle, failing core defensive metrics. Meanwhile, **Philip Fisher** and **Peter Lynch** strike a cautious middle ground—acknowledging growth but questioning whether the price already reflects it, while **Morgan Housel** sees it as holdable but not effortless. The most bearish camp—including **Charles Mackay** and **Samuel Armstrong Nelson**—flags speculative or overbought signals, aligning with **Walter Bagehot** and **Gerald M. Loeb**, who warn of liquidity and capital-preservation risks. Even **Jack Schwager’s** technical discipline would steer clear, illustrating how DELL’s perceived risks (valuation, timing, crowd behavior) clash with its growth appeal.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 92
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 69
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 68
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 62
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 36
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 36
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 30
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 29
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 22
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 19
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 11
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 10
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 6
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
20.0%
Operating Margin
7.2%
Net Margin
5.2%
EBITDA Margin
9.8%
ROE
-240.3%
ROA
5.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$8.79
Cash
$11.53B
Total Debt
$31.50B
Current Ratio
0.91
Debt/Equity
-12.75
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.7.2026 | $0.630 |
| 20.7.2026 | $0.630 |
| 21.4.2026 | $0.630 |
| 20.4.2026 | $0.630 |
| 20.1.2026 | $0.525 |
| 19.1.2026 | $0.525 |
| 21.10.2025 | $0.525 |
| 20.10.2025 | $0.525 |
| 22.7.2025 | $0.525 |
| 21.7.2025 | $0.525 |
| 22.4.2025 | $0.525 |
| 21.4.2025 | $0.525 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$568.06
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$176.88
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-68.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.4% | $8.93B | $8.19B |
| 2 | 4.0% | $9.28B | $7.81B |
| 3 | 3.5% | $9.61B | $7.42B |
| 4 | 3.0% | $9.89B | $7.01B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $10.14B | $6.59B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$8.55B
Terminal Value
$159.92B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$103.94B
Enterprise Value
$140.96B
Net Debt
$19.98B
Equity Value
$120.99B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$3.61
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$38.82
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Benzinga · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
CNBC · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Dell Technologies (DELL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 65/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DELL currently scores 65/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DELL's estimated fair value is $176.88, which is 68.9% below the current price of $568.06. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DELL's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 36.1%; Free cash flow growth: 357.6%; Net income growth: 29.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $176.88 vs. price $568.06 (-68.9%); ATR: 5.9% of price; Current ratio: 0.91.
Yes — DELL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 22 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 71,348 | -71,348 | — |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 260 | -260 | $550.71 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 153 | -153 | $549.74 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 509 | -509 | $548.78 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 1,299 | -1,299 | $547.31 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 2,199 | -2,199 | $546.53 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 6,962 | -6,962 | $544.42 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 2,996 | -2,996 | $545.40 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 2,157 | -2,157 | $538.03 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 226 | -226 | $534.09 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 71,348 | +71,348 | — |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 679 | -679 | $538.63 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 4,319 | -4,319 | $542.47 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 1,261 | -1,261 | $541.33 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 2,384 | -2,384 | $540.56 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 6,662 | -6,662 | $535.97 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 3,360 | -3,360 | $543.50 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 7,742 | -7,742 | $535.13 |
| SL SPV-2, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 4,929 | -4,929 | $536.89 |
| Silver Lake Partners IV, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 1,057 | -1,057 | $534.63 |
| Silver Lake Partners IV, L.P. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.9.2026 | 73,243 | -73,243 | — |
| Silver Lake Partners IV, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 243 | -243 | $535.50 |
| Silver Lake Partners IV, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 167 | -167 | $549.74 |
| Silver Lake Partners IV, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 7,630 | -7,630 | $544.42 |
| Silver Lake Partners IV, L.P. | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 600 | -600 | $533.70 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
14,444,059 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 13,176,463 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
64.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology