Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$33.43
▼ $0.08 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:44 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$42.30B
Day Range
$32.86 - $33.61
52-Week Range
$28.04 - $42.82
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$31.47
Resistance
$39.09
CMG is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-16.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $21.02 vs. price $33.43 (-37.1%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
83/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
+1.2%
Median 40D Outcome
45/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
60%
+10.1% … +12.1%
🟡 Base
7%
+0.9% … +0.9%
🔴 Bearish
33%
-12.6% … -6.8%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 60% (95% CI 36%–80%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +9.0%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
4 occurrence(s) · 75% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.4% | -1.7% … +3.3% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.1% | -2.3% … +5.4% | +1.2% |
| 20D | 60% (36%–80%) | +9.0% | -6.6% … +10.9% | +1.8% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.2% | -7.1% … +13.0% | +3.2% |
| 60D | 60% (36%–80%) | +4.7% | -6.4% … +19.3% | +3.7% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-21 | 83/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +12.1% | +14.2% |
| 2018-12-19 | 82/100 | Downtrend | +20.2% | +55.9% |
| 2021-03-05 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +9.0% | +2.2% |
| 2022-04-22 | 79/100 | Downtrend | -12.6% | -7.2% |
| 2025-02-20 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -7.6% | -1.4% |
| 2022-11-01 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +10.1% | +8.9% |
| 2022-09-26 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +0.9% | -6.8% |
| 2020-11-02 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +11.1% | +24.5% |
| 2025-03-10 | 76/100 | Downtrend | -6.3% | +4.7% |
| 2023-02-27 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +10.2% | +36.9% |
| 2020-09-21 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +10.7% | +11.6% |
| 2025-07-22 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -17.4% | -20.3% |
| 2025-01-10 | 74/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +2.3% | -18.6% |
| 2022-10-11 | 73/100 | Consolidation | -6.8% | -6.0% |
| 2023-10-12 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +16.8% | +24.4% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $33.88
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 1 to 29 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $33.68
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 34 to 5 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 23, 2026
Then
65
$36.90
Now
48
$33.43
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
50
Quality
63
Value
43
Momentum
26
Risk
48
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
70
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING CMG...
Recent media coverage of Chipotle Mexican Grill has centered on two key themes: its historic growth trajectory and its first major international expansion. The company’s success—including its dramatic stock performance over a decade—has been contrasted with McDonald’s past decision to divest its 90% stake in Chipotle in 2006, which investors now view as a missed opportunity. Additionally, Chipotle’s recent opening of its first Asian restaurant in Seoul, South Korea, through a joint venture, marks a strategic test of its fast-casual model in new markets, signaling cautious global expansion.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Chipotle Mexican Grill. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 7 vs. 7 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
70
Technical
26
Valuation
43
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+3%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are exhibiting **overconfidence**—driven by a disconnect between price momentum (+6.6% ROC) and stagnant EPS growth (0%), alongside a 76% premium to DCF fair value. The **euphoria** score (40) further implies detached valuation optimism, while **FOMO** (27) reflects chasing activity despite moderate overbought conditions (RSI 56). The **narrative gap** (37) widens reality (42) from narrative (79), reinforcing potential mispricing. The key question: *Will traders reassess fundamentals, or will momentum sustain despite valuation extremes?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:19 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"McDonald's did not capture by selling its Chipotle holding"
"Chipotle Mexican Grill has opened its first restaurant in Asia at 423 Gangnam-daero in Seoul"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent verdicts reflect stark contrasts in methodology priorities. Jesse Livermore’s near-neutral stance (65) suggests indecision due to unclear trend signals, while Burton Malkiel and John Bogle’s (57) skepticism aligns with their belief that active stock-picking rarely outperforms broad indices. Meanwhile, Charles Mackay’s (57) caution highlights speculative crowd behavior, contrasting sharply with Benjamin Graham’s (17) outright rejection—his rigid defensive criteria flagging the stock as fundamentally overvalued or risky. Philip Fisher’s (35) dismissal underscores its lack of the quality/growth traits he demanded, whereas Howard Marks’ (44) mixed view acknowledges a strong business but warns of inflated expectations. The divide between Graham’s value discipline and Fisher’s growth focus illustrates how even moderate scores (like those from Smith or Loeb) hinge on vastly different frameworks: one prioritizing safety margins, the other operational excellence.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 85
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 54
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 53
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 48
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 37
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 27
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 17
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 13
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
33.7%
Operating Margin
16.2%
Net Margin
12.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
54.3%
ROA
17.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.15
Cash
$350.55M
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
1.23
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$33.43
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$21.02
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-37.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
11.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.4% | $1.61B | $1.48B |
| 2 | 9.2% | $1.76B | $1.48B |
| 3 | 7.0% | $1.88B | $1.46B |
| 4 | 4.7% | $1.97B | $1.40B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $2.02B | $1.32B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.45B
Terminal Value
$31.91B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$20.74B
Enterprise Value
$27.87B
Net Debt
$-350.55M
Equity Value
$28.22B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.17
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$84.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 6 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CMG currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CMG's estimated fair value is $21.02, which is 37.1% below the current price of $33.43. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CMG's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 54.3% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.00.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $21.02 vs. price $33.43 (-37.1%); Calmar: -0.08 (3y annualized return -4.6% / max drawdown 58.9%); Free cash flow growth: -4.2%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CMG.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schalow Laurie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 176,465 | -20,075 | $35.29 |
| Boatwright Scott | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 318,609 | -31,522 | $35.29 |
| Eskenazi Ilene | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 76,020 | -19,701 | $35.29 |
| Garner Curtis E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 390,788 | -27,582 | $35.29 |
| Rymer Adam T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 83,882 | -9,276 | $35.29 |
| Rymer Adam T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 9,276 | -9,276 | $35.29 |
| Schalow Laurie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 20,075 | -20,075 | $35.29 |
| Boatwright Scott | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 31,522 | -31,522 | $35.29 |
| Garner Curtis E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 27,582 | -27,582 | $35.29 |
| Eskenazi Ilene | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.8.2026 | 19,701 | -19,701 | $35.29 |
| Bush Matthew R | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 21,415 | -2,675 | $35.75 |
| Bush Matthew R | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 2,675 | -2,675 | $35.75 |
| Machado Fernando | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 235,184 | +235,184 | — |
| Machado Fernando | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.8.2026 | 76,243 | +76,243 | — |
| Carey Matt | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 6,880 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| FILIKRUSHEL PATRICIA | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 6,880 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| Baldocchi Albert S | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 6,880 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| Hickenlooper Robin S | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 6,880 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| Fuentes Laura | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 6,880 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| Gutierrez Mauricio | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 6,880 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| Maw Scott Harlan | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 6,880 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| WINSTON MARY A | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 6,880 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| weinstein joshua ian | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 6,880 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| Baldocchi Albert S | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 862,140 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
| Carey Matt | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 66,682 | +6,880 | $31.25 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
39,734,303 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 39,015,442 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology