Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$1,037.24
▼ $21.42 (-2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/17 06:47 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$160.70B
Day Range
$1,017.46 - $1,061.43
52-Week Range
$917.39 - $1,219.94
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.10.2026
BLK is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
-7.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.23
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $555.32 vs. price $1,037.24 (-46.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
86/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
92/100
Analog Quality
+1.3%
Median 40D Outcome
67/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+3.0% … +12.2%
🟡 Base
27%
-0.4% … +0.4%
🔴 Bearish
27%
-5.8% … -2.3%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.8%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.5% | -1.0% … +2.5% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.7% | -1.3% … +3.5% | +0.8% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -1.3% … +5.9% | +1.5% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.3% | -2.6% … +12.3% | +2.2% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.9% | -2.6% … +11.5% | +3.1% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-09 | 86/100 | Consolidation | +1.1% | +11.8% |
| 2023-02-22 | 85/100 | Consolidation | -5.7% | -2.6% |
| 2023-08-15 | 85/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +3.6% | -2.7% |
| 2019-05-31 | 83/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +12.9% | -2.4% |
| 2025-11-06 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +0.3% | +0.6% |
| 2018-07-03 | 79/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -2.4% | -2.7% |
| 2026-06-08 | 79/100 | Downtrend | -0.4% | +11.3% |
| 2023-05-10 | 79/100 | Downtrend | +8.2% | +13.3% |
| 2021-09-30 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +11.5% | +10.0% |
| 2023-03-09 | 76/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +0.8% | +3.9% |
| 2018-08-15 | 76/100 | Downtrend | -0.4% | -10.5% |
| 2022-01-18 | 76/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -6.1% | -14.0% |
| 2025-02-27 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +2.4% | +1.9% |
| 2020-09-15 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +16.6% | +28.0% |
| 2023-10-03 | 73/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -2.1% | +30.2% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
39
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 22, 2026
Then
51
$1,156.55
Now
39
$1,037.24
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
37
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
9
Risk
56
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
60
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING BLK...
Recent media coverage of BlackRock has primarily focused on its broader role in financial markets rather than company-specific developments. Notably, a BlackRock executive was quoted in *Benzinga* (2026-09-07) comparing Bitcoin to gold as an asset class, highlighting the firm’s engagement with digital assets. The headlines do not provide direct details about BlackRock’s operations, strategy, or financial performance, so no further company-specific insights can be derived from these sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about BlackRock. News trend score: 56. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
64
Fundamentals
60
Technical
9
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant herding behavior suggests investors are aligning with peers’ relative underperformance, despite BLK’s valuation premium (+97% over DCF). Overconfidence and euphoria scores hint at lingering optimism, but weak momentum and neutral RSI temper extreme enthusiasm. The key question is whether the narrative gap (51 vs. 37) reflects overestimation of growth potential or mispricing. The open tension lies in whether herding will persist or shift as valuation disconnects from fundamentals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:20 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"BlackRock Exec Says Bitcoin ETFs' closest rival is Gold"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep philosophical and methodological divides among the investors. The highest-scoring methodologies—like Nelson’s cycle-based approach (88) and Smith’s long-term buy-and-hold framework (82)—suggest it may be undervalued or near a cyclical trough, while others like Graham’s defensive criteria (18) and Veblen’s growth-pursuit critique (17) dismiss it outright as either risky or lacking intrinsic value. The middle-ground thinkers—such as Loeb (70) and Marks (55)—caution that while the stock isn’t obviously speculative, its valuation or market positioning may already price in too much optimism. Meanwhile, Fisher (45) and Lynch (40) reject it for failing to meet their growth-at-a-reasonable-price thresholds, while the efficient-market camp (38) sees no clear edge over passive indexing. The contrast underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in timing, fundamentals, or sheer speculation—depending entirely on the investor’s core assumptions.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 98
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 83
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 82
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 67
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 51
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 45
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 40
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 18
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 17
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
29.1%
Net Margin
22.9%
EBITDA Margin
33.7%
ROE
9.9%
ROA
3.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$35.83
Cash
$11.47B
Total Debt
$12.77B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.23
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.9.2026 | $5.730 |
| 5.6.2026 | $5.730 |
| 4.6.2026 | $5.730 |
| 6.3.2026 | $5.730 |
| 5.3.2026 | $5.730 |
| 5.12.2025 | $5.210 |
| 4.12.2025 | $5.210 |
| 5.9.2025 | $5.210 |
| 4.9.2025 | $5.210 |
| 5.6.2025 | $5.210 |
| 4.6.2025 | $5.210 |
| 7.3.2025 | $5.210 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1,037.24
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$555.32
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-46.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $4.44B | $4.07B |
| 2 | 19.4% | $5.30B | $4.46B |
| 3 | 13.8% | $6.03B | $4.66B |
| 4 | 8.1% | $6.52B | $4.62B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $6.68B | $4.34B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$3.55B
Terminal Value
$105.37B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$68.48B
Enterprise Value
$90.63B
Net Debt
$1.30B
Equity Value
$89.33B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$347.42
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$45.77
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 9 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
BlackRock (BLK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 39/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BLK currently scores 39/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BLK's estimated fair value is $555.32, which is 46.5% below the current price of $1,037.24. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BLK's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.23; Operating margin: 29.1% — strong; Net margin: 22.9% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $555.32 vs. price $1,037.24 (-46.5%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -15.9%.
Yes — BLK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FINK LAURENCE | Gift | 21.7.2026 | 7,852 | -7,852 | — |
| FINK LAURENCE | Gift | 21.7.2026 | 215,979 | -7,852 | — |
| Meade Christopher J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.7.2026 | 18,095 | -18,095 | — |
| Meade Christopher J. | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 15,895 | -15,895 | $1,101.99 |
| Meade Christopher J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.7.2026 | 18,095 | +18,095 | $513.50 |
| FINK LAURENCE | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 1,905 | -1,905 | $1,080.57 |
| Meade Christopher J. | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 2,200 | -2,200 | $1,102.80 |
| FINK LAURENCE | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 223,831 | -1,905 | $1,080.57 |
| Meade Christopher J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.7.2026 | 32,154 | +18,095 | $513.50 |
| Meade Christopher J. | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 16,259 | -15,895 | $1,101.99 |
| Meade Christopher J. | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 14,059 | -2,200 | $1,102.80 |
| Meade Christopher J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.7.2026 | 0 | -18,095 | — |
| Daley Pamela | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 30 | +30 | — |
| FORD WILLIAM E | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 37 | +37 | — |
| Freda Fabrizio | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 21 | +21 | — |
| Johnson Margaret L | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 36 | +36 | — |
| LEMKAU GREGG | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 30 | +30 | — |
| Murphy Kathleen | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 41 | +41 | — |
| Nasser Amin H. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 30 | +30 | — |
| Nixon Gordon M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 37 | +37 | — |
| PECK KRISTIN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 34 | +34 | — |
| Robbins Charles | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 30 | +30 | — |
| Vestberg Hans Erik | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 36 | +36 | — |
| FORD WILLIAM E | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 16,709 | +37 | — |
| Daley Pamela | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 6,503 | +30 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,911,216 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,176,024 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology