Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$167.90
▼ $2.62 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:22 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$126.16B
Day Range
$166.90 - $169.93
52-Week Range
$150.14 - $225.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$166.90
Resistance
$217.32
BKNG is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-22.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 10.5% / max drawdown 33.7%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
78/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
+8.1%
Median 40D Outcome
52/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
80%
+3.7% … +11.7%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
20%
-16.0% … -6.9%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 80% (95% CI 55%–93%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +3.9%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
5 occurrence(s) · 60% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
4 occurrence(s) · 75% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 67% (42%–85%) | +3.4% | -2.1% … +6.5% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 67% (42%–85%) | +3.5% | -0.0% … +9.8% | +0.8% |
| 20D | 80% (55%–93%) | +3.9% | +1.9% … +10.0% | +1.6% |
| 40D | 73% (48%–89%) | +8.1% | +2.5% … +15.2% | +1.8% |
| 60D | 80% (55%–93%) | +6.5% | +2.2% … +22.3% | +2.1% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-18 | 78/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +2.6% | -9.6% |
| 2022-03-10 | 73/100 | High Volatility | +9.0% | +15.6% |
| 2021-11-30 | 71/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +13.5% | +8.5% |
| 2020-03-06 | 71/100 | Downtrend | -23.7% | +2.7% |
| 2026-05-11 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +3.9% | +31.4% |
| 2018-12-24 | 67/100 | Downtrend | +11.1% | +6.5% |
| 2020-09-23 | 66/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +3.9% | +29.0% |
| 2019-01-09 | 65/100 | Downtrend | +13.8% | +7.3% |
| 2024-08-07 | 65/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +14.4% | +41.5% |
| 2019-03-08 | 65/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +3.1% | +1.8% |
| 2022-06-27 | 64/100 | Downtrend | -5.3% | -4.7% |
| 2026-02-03 | 63/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -8.4% | -9.4% |
| 2018-08-16 | 62/100 | Downtrend | +5.0% | +6.2% |
| 2025-03-13 | 59/100 | Downtrend | +4.6% | +29.0% |
| 2026-04-02 | 59/100 | Downtrend | +1.1% | +6.2% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
66
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
66
$211.19
Now
48
$167.90
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
6
Risk
48
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
59
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING BKNG...
Recent media coverage of Booking Holdings has primarily focused on its subsidiary **Agoda**, highlighting travel trends ahead of major regional holidays. Agoda’s reports detail surging search interest for domestic and international destinations among Vietnamese (National Day), South Korean (Chuseok), and Japanese (Silver Week) travelers, with domestic travel demand spiking significantly—160% in South Korea and 120% in Japan. Separately, there’s been investor attention on Booking Holdings’ stock, including dividend potential and post-earnings performance, though no operational or financial updates beyond earnings were noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Booking Holdings. News trend score: 98. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
88
Fundamentals
59
Technical
6
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
39
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant herding behavior suggests traders are aligning with peers despite BKNG’s sharper decline. Negative momentum and elevated volume align with panic selling, but volatility remains muted, reducing extreme fear. The narrative gap (-3) hints at a slight disconnect between sentiment (optimistic) and technical reality (weak). Key question: Will traders double down on underperformance or exit as peers stabilize?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:48 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"accommodation searches for international and domestic destinations have increased by 38% and 160%, respectively"
"Booking Holdings (BKNG) Declines More Than Market"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for BKNG reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors assess stocks. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising variants both see strong value—Nelson’s near-perfect score suggests a cyclical buying opportunity, while Graham’s frameworks highlight deep discounts and long-term potential. Meanwhile, Fisher and Lynch, who prioritize exceptional quality and growth beyond current valuations, are far more cautious, flagging that the stock’s price may already embed much of its upside. The middle-ground approaches—like Marks’ mixed verdict or Malkiel & Bogle’s skepticism—highlight the tension between business fundamentals and market efficiency, while Livermore and Veblen’s low scores imply either indecision or skepticism about sustainable profitability. The contrast underscores whether this stock is a disciplined value play (Graham, Nelson) or a speculative bet (Fisher, Lynch) or even a neutral market participant (Efficient Market theorists).
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 85
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 85
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 80
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 77
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 65
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 61
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 55
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 55
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 45
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 42
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 24
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
32.8%
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
35.1%
ROE
—
ROA
—
ROIC
—
EPS
$166.52
Cash
$17.20B
Total Debt
$18.74B
Current Ratio
1.33
Debt/Equity
-3.36
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $0.420 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.420 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.420 |
| 6.3.2026 | $0.420 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.420 |
| 5.12.2025 | $0.384 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.384 |
| 5.9.2025 | $0.384 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.384 |
| 6.6.2025 | $0.384 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.384 |
| 7.3.2025 | $0.384 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$167.90
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$5,923.32
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
16.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.5% | $10.59B | $9.71B |
| 2 | 13.0% | $11.96B | $10.07B |
| 3 | 9.5% | $13.10B | $10.12B |
| 4 | 6.0% | $13.89B | $9.84B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $14.23B | $9.25B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$9.09B
Terminal Value
$224.45B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$145.88B
Enterprise Value
$194.86B
Net Debt
$1.53B
Equity Value
$193.33B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$170.90
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$280.80
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Booking Holdings (BKNG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BKNG currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
BKNG's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: -3.36; Operating margin: 32.8% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 10.5% / max drawdown 33.7%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -4.1%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — BKNG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYLOD ROBERT J JR | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $200.00 |
| Pisano Paulo | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $203.48 |
| MILLONES PETER J | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,019 | -5,019 | $208.73 |
| MILLONES PETER J | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 9,325 | -9,325 | $204.91 |
| WITTMAN VANESSA AMES | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 375 | -375 | $211.00 |
| MILLONES PETER J | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 2,890 | -2,890 | $212.32 |
| MILLONES PETER J | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 3,632 | -3,632 | $211.03 |
| MILLONES PETER J | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 12,333 | -12,333 | $205.76 |
| MILLONES PETER J | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 390 | -390 | $212.88 |
| MILLONES PETER J | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 8,660 | -8,660 | $208.05 |
| MILLONES PETER J | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,174 | -5,174 | $210.00 |
| MILLONES PETER J | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 2,627 | -2,627 | $206.58 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 1,890 | -1,890 | $212.54 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 8,461 | -8,461 | $211.82 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 4,890 | -4,890 | $209.67 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 860 | -860 | $208.65 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 3,899 | -3,899 | $210.80 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 74,044 | -4,890 | $209.67 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 78,934 | -860 | $208.65 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 70,145 | -3,899 | $210.80 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 61,684 | -8,461 | $211.82 |
| Steenbergen Ewout L | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 59,794 | -1,890 | $212.54 |
| MYLOD ROBERT J JR | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $206.70 |
| MYLOD ROBERT J JR | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 15,000 | -1,000 | $206.70 |
| MYLOD ROBERT J JR | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $200.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
20,152,864 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 23,687,573 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
47.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology