Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$33.17
▲ $0.44 (+1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/17 05:10 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$16.85B
Day Range
$32.78 - $33.28
52-Week Range
$21.11 - $36.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
BEN is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+32.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.20
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (64/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
81/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+6.3%
Median 40D Outcome
56/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+5.1% … +11.4%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
53%
-9.5% … -3.3%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -1.3%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.1% | -3.2% … +4.1% | +0.1% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.2% | -4.9% … +5.1% | -0.2% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | -1.3% | -8.5% … +8.8% | -0.4% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +6.3% | -7.5% … +14.3% | -1.3% |
| 60D | 40% (20%–64%) | -3.8% | -9.2% … +15.4% | -1.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | 81/100 | Consolidation | -10.7% | -15.8% |
| 2019-05-31 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +9.4% | -18.5% |
| 2025-11-18 | 81/100 | Downtrend | +10.4% | +28.2% |
| 2019-05-13 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +2.0% | -7.3% |
| 2018-03-22 | 78/100 | Downtrend | -8.7% | -10.5% |
| 2021-09-21 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.0% | +16.8% |
| 2023-08-15 | 76/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.8% | -12.4% |
| 2019-11-13 | 76/100 | Downtrend | -1.9% | -7.8% |
| 2024-12-17 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -8.3% | -6.9% |
| 2023-09-22 | 75/100 | Downtrend | -9.8% | +16.8% |
| 2021-04-22 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +15.9% | -0.3% |
| 2026-03-10 | 74/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -1.3% | +26.8% |
| 2024-10-08 | 74/100 | Downtrend | +8.3% | +5.5% |
| 2025-09-18 | 73/100 | Consolidation | -9.4% | -3.8% |
| 2026-06-03 | 73/100 | Uptrend | +12.3% | +14.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
55
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
26d ago · $34.31
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
26d ago · $34.31
Evidence: 5 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $33.98
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $33.98
Evidence: 3 bullish / 5 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
29d ago · $33.93
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
29d ago · $33.93
Evidence: 4 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
55
$33.91
Now
47
$33.17
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
64
Quality
47
Value
45
Momentum
23
Risk
48
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
52
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING BEN...
Recent media coverage of **Franklin Resources** (Franklin Templeton) has centered on strategic partnerships and expansion into digital assets, particularly its collaboration with **HashKey Holdings** to launch the **Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Liquidity Fund**, a tokenized fund targeting Asian investors. The company also announced a **majority stake acquisition of Stoneshield Capital**, a leading European real assets manager, in a joint venture with **Clarion Partners**. Additionally, there were reports on the company’s **quarterly dividend declaration** and a **CFO’s recent stock sale** following a market rally. No broader operational or financial crises were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Franklin Resources. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
71
Fundamentals
52
Technical
23
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
46
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for BEN suggests a dominant narrative-reality disconnect, with euphoric momentum and overconfidence driving speculative interest despite moderate overvaluation. Herding signals indicate passive alignment with peers, while anchoring near resistance hints at potential price resistance. The absence of panic or loss aversion reinforces a bullish, momentum-driven bias. The key question remains whether the premium to fair value and extreme sentiment will sustain momentum or trigger a re-evaluation.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:30 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Franklin Templeton has delivered a total return of more than 88% since January 2020."
"Franklin Templeton Announces Distributions for Certain Closed-End Funds... for the Month of September 2026."
"ETFs Open Up The World To Franklin Templeton Investors."
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between growth-focused and value-driven methodologies. Morgan Housel and Walter Bagehot’s high scores highlight its steady fundamentals and liquidity, suggesting a quiet, resilient long-term play for patient investors. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham and Philip Fisher’s low scores underscore its failure to meet traditional value or quality thresholds, while Peter Lynch and Samuel Nelson’s caution signals potential overvaluation or stretched market positioning. The middle-ground approaches—like Howard Marks’ mixed assessment or Jesse Livermore’s indecision—further split the debate, with some seeing latent potential amid high expectations and others dismissing it as a speculative bubble.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 81
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 74
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 63
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 48
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 41
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 34
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 24
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 21
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$31.73
Range Bottom
$36.28
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
6.9%
Net Margin
6.0%
EBITDA Margin
8.3%
ROE
4.3%
ROA
1.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.91
Cash
$3.57B
Total Debt
$2.36B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.20
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.6.2026 | $0.330 |
| 28.6.2026 | $0.330 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.330 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.330 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.330 |
| 29.12.2025 | $0.330 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.320 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.320 |
| 27.6.2025 | $0.320 |
| 26.6.2025 | $0.320 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.320 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.320 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$33.17
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$29.87
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-9.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1% | $930.79M | $853.93M |
| 2 | 2.2% | $951.30M | $800.69M |
| 3 | 2.3% | $973.20M | $751.49M |
| 4 | 2.4% | $996.57M | $705.99M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.02B | $663.89M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$911.60M
Terminal Value
$16.11B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$10.47B
Enterprise Value
$14.25B
Net Debt
$-1.21B
Equity Value
$15.46B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$23.34
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.30
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Motley Fool · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Franklin Resources (BEN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BEN currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BEN's estimated fair value is $29.87, which is 9.9% below the current price of $33.17. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BEN's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.20; Price is above the 200-day average; Free cash flow growth: 14.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.16 (3y annualized return 7.2% / max drawdown 44.8%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — BEN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicholls Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 61,533 | -61,533 | $34.15 |
| JOHNSON JENNIFER M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 116,053 | -116,053 | $34.15 |
| JOHNSON GREGORY E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 10,568 | -10,568 | $34.15 |
| Murphy Terrence | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 25,125 | -25,125 | $34.15 |
| Oshita Lindsey Harumi | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 2,598 | -2,598 | $34.15 |
| Merchant Thomas C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 9,807 | -9,807 | $34.15 |
| Gamba Daniel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 64,136 | -64,136 | $34.15 |
| Murphy Terrence | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 229,850 | +229,850 | $32.63 |
| JOHNSON JENNIFER M | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 229,850 | +229,850 | $32.63 |
| Nicholls Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 229,850 | +229,850 | $32.63 |
| Gamba Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 229,850 | +229,850 | $32.63 |
| JOHNSON JENNIFER M | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 3,554,034 | +229,850 | $32.63 |
| Murphy Terrence | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 416,009 | +229,850 | $32.63 |
| Nicholls Matthew | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 778,797 | +229,850 | $32.63 |
| Gamba Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 672,720 | +229,850 | $32.63 |
| FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC | Open Market Sale | 20.7.2026 | 1,682,905.226 | -1,682,905.226 | $11.29 |
| Kim John Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 983.559 | +983.559 | $34.06 |
| King Karen Matsushima | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 1,005.578 | +1,005.578 | $34.06 |
| Kim John Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 78,893 | +984 | $34.06 |
| King Karen Matsushima | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 72,435 | +1,006 | $34.06 |
| King Karen Matsushima | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.5.2026 | 83.78 | +83.78 | $29.84 |
| King Karen Matsushima | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.5.2026 | 71,429 | +84 | $29.84 |
| FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC | Open Market Sale | 20.4.2026 | 1,672,535.211 | -1,672,535.211 | $11.36 |
| FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC | Other Transaction | 16.4.2026 | 88,105.727 | +88,105.727 | $11.35 |
| FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC | Other Transaction | 16.4.2026 | 88,028.169 | -88,028.169 | $11.36 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,280,466 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 20,467,767 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology