Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$92.45
▼ $0.79 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/17 07:17 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$19.39B
Day Range
$91.38 - $93.41
52-Week Range
$55.10 - $95.81
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
BBY is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+24.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 36.1% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $81.45 vs. price $92.45 (-11.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
81/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
-0.0%
Median 40D Outcome
56/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
27%
+10.7% … +13.9%
🟡 Base
20%
+0.2% … +0.3%
🔴 Bearish
53%
-9.2% … -3.8%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 60 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 27% (95% CI 11%–52%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -1.1%.
No major conflicts found.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
12 occurrence(s) · 33% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 27% (11%–52%) | -1.0% | -2.6% … +1.6% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -2.5% … +4.3% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 27% (11%–52%) | -1.1% | -7.2% … +4.1% | +0.1% |
| 40D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.0% | -3.9% … +7.2% | +0.9% |
| 60D | 40% (20%–64%) | -3.3% | -5.0% … +6.3% | +0.5% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-06 | 81/100 | Uptrend | +15.0% | +25.5% |
| 2020-10-16 | 79/100 | Uptrend | -4.2% | -5.1% |
| 2019-12-10 | 79/100 | Uptrend | +7.8% | -19.3% |
| 2021-04-06 | 77/100 | Uptrend | -2.5% | -4.8% |
| 2018-04-30 | 77/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -10.9% | -1.6% |
| 2017-12-14 | 77/100 | Uptrend | +13.6% | +9.6% |
| 2025-10-22 | 77/100 | Uptrend | -8.6% | -19.1% |
| 2021-01-26 | 76/100 | Uptrend | -1.1% | +2.9% |
| 2018-06-22 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +0.2% | +1.9% |
| 2019-10-24 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +0.1% | +23.8% |
| 2017-08-09 | 76/100 | Uptrend | -8.3% | -6.1% |
| 2020-07-31 | 74/100 | Uptrend | +11.7% | +14.8% |
| 2020-11-23 | 73/100 | Uptrend | -14.7% | -4.4% |
| 2021-02-16 | 73/100 | Uptrend | -6.0% | -3.8% |
| 2025-09-10 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +0.4% | -3.3% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
64
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
25d ago · $85.89
Evidence: תבנית שמתאימה לשלב חלוקה מוקדם/אמצעי — טווח מסחר אחרי עלייה עם מחזור מסחר יורד.
What happened after
25d ago · $85.89
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $89.21
Evidence: תבנית שמתאימה לשלב חלוקה מוקדם/אמצעי — טווח מסחר אחרי עלייה עם מחזור מסחר יורד.
What happened after
28d ago · $89.21
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
29d ago · $87.83
Evidence: תבנית שמתאימה לשלב חלוקה מוקדם/אמצעי — טווח מסחר אחרי עלייה עם מחזור מסחר יורד.
What happened after
29d ago · $87.83
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
64
$87.81
Now
61
$92.45
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
75
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
58
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING BBY...
Recent media coverage of Best Buy has primarily centered on its stock performance and analyst reactions. The company saw a downgrade from DA Davidson, which cut its rating to Neutral and lowered its price target to $95, contributing to a decline in Best Buy’s shares. Analysts like those at Daiwa Securities also adjusted their price targets, though Daiwa maintained a Neutral rating with a revised target of $83. Broader market sentiment toward hardline retailers, including Best Buy, remains uncertain amid economic challenges. No significant operational or product-related news was highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Best Buy. News trend score: 100. Reason: 18 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
41
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
54
Fundamentals
58
Technical
75
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+24%
Market Narrative
80
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+44
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
BBY’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, with traders likely fixating on the 3.0% resistance level, despite strong momentum and euphoric sentiment. The narrative-reality gap (31 points) suggests optimism outpaces fundamentals, while FOMO and herding indicate herd-like behavior amid peer underperformance. Overconfidence may persist due to price outperforming EPS growth. The key question: will traders break resistance, or will anchoring hold as sentiment remains extreme?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:17 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"DA Davidson downgrades Best Buy to Neutral From Buy, price target is $95"
"Uneven Investor Sentiment Toward Hardline Retailers Could Persist Amid Macro Headwinds"
"Best Buy’s Q2 earnings beat and raised guidance amid steady Computing growth"
"Best Buy’s turnaround gains steam as leadership changes hands"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 62/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for BBY reflects deep methodological disagreements about risk, valuation, and market psychology. The highest-scoring methodologies—like Veblen’s and the efficient-market approach—suggest *some* potential, though both flag uncertainty over whether growth will translate into sustainable profits or justify active stock-picking over passive indexing. Meanwhile, the most conservative voices—Graham’s defensive investor, Fisher, and Housel—reject the stock outright, dismissing it as either overpriced, lacking quality, or too volatile for patient long-term holding. Even the more flexible Enterprising Investor variant of Graham (score: 15) finds it statistically unattractive, while cycle-focused analysts like Marks and Nelson warn of late-stage risks or overbought conditions. The middle ground, represented by Lynch, Smith, and Malkiel/Bogle, acknowledges growth but questions whether the price already discounts it fully, leaving little margin for error.
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 63
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 62
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 59
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 47
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 46
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 38
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 32
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 29
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 18
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 13
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 13
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 9
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
22.5%
Operating Margin
3.3%
Net Margin
2.6%
EBITDA Margin
5.3%
ROE
36.1%
ROA
7.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.06
Cash
$1.74B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.11
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.6.2026 | $0.960 |
| 17.6.2026 | $0.960 |
| 24.3.2026 | $0.960 |
| 23.3.2026 | $0.960 |
| 16.12.2025 | $0.950 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.950 |
| 18.9.2025 | $0.950 |
| 17.9.2025 | $0.950 |
| 18.6.2025 | $0.950 |
| 17.6.2025 | $0.950 |
| 25.3.2025 | $0.950 |
| 24.3.2025 | $0.950 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$92.45
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$81.45
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-11.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-3.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -3.4% | $1.22B | $1.11B |
| 2 | -1.9% | $1.19B | $1.00B |
| 3 | -0.4% | $1.19B | $916.30M |
| 4 | 1.0% | $1.20B | $849.27M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.23B | $798.62M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.26B
Terminal Value
$19.38B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$12.59B
Enterprise Value
$17.28B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$17.28B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$13.97
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.25
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 18 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
The Fly · 8.9.2026
Best Buy (BBY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BBY currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BBY's estimated fair value is $81.45, which is 11.9% below the current price of $92.45. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BBY's technical score is 75/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 36.1% — strong; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $81.45 vs. price $92.45 (-11.9%); SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200; Operating margin is eroding over time.
Yes — BBY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 19 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRAMMAN ANNE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 14,581 | +14,581 | — |
| BRAMMAN ANNE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 18,955 | +18,955 | — |
| Watson Mathew | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.7.2026 | 5,874 | +5,874 | — |
| Watson Mathew | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.7.2026 | 27,678 | +5,874 | — |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 107,534 | -107,534 | $82.82 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 42,106 | -42,106 | $83.63 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 88,288 | -88,288 | $81.73 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 62,072 | -62,072 | $80.88 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 9,788,830 | -42,106 | $83.63 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 9,726,758 | -62,072 | $80.88 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 9,638,470 | -88,288 | $81.73 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 9,530,936 | -107,534 | $82.82 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 252,380 | -252,380 | $81.78 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 336,006 | -336,006 | $82.50 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 11,614 | -11,614 | $83.44 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 10,419,322 | -11,614 | $83.44 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 10,166,942 | -252,380 | $81.78 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 13.7.2026 | 9,830,936 | -336,006 | $82.50 |
| Hartman Todd G. | Gift | 7.7.2026 | 600 | -600 | — |
| Hartman Todd G. | Gift | 7.7.2026 | 43,916 | -600 | — |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 26.6.2026 | 224,705 | -224,705 | $78.10 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 26.6.2026 | 10,430,936 | -224,705 | $78.10 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 193,896 | -193,896 | $78.13 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 10,655,641 | -193,896 | $78.13 |
| SCHULZE RICHARD M | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 5,100 | -5,100 | $78.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
14,868,267 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 15,912,204 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology