Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$123.80
▼ $1.52 (-1.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:32 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$12.79B
Day Range
$122.86 - $125.93
52-Week Range
$95.80 - $186.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$117.43
Resistance
$149.87
ARES is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
-32.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/18 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 28.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.11 (3y annualized return 5.8% / max drawdown 51.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
73/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
88/100
Analog Quality
+9.3%
Median 40D Outcome
25/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
60%
+6.5% … +18.8%
🟡 Base
7%
+0.8% … +0.8%
🔴 Bearish
33%
-11.2% … -5.0%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 60% (95% CI 36%–80%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.9%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
6 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Echo #2 — Oversold Reversal
2 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.6% | -7.4% … +7.7% | +0.7% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +4.3% | -0.8% … +8.6% | +1.3% |
| 20D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.9% | -3.0% … +18.6% | +2.6% |
| 40D | 67% (42%–85%) | +9.3% | -7.3% … +21.9% | +4.9% |
| 60D | 80% (55%–93%) | +7.8% | +3.3% … +14.3% | +7.5% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-28 | 73/100 | Downtrend | -21.2% | -23.1% |
| 2022-09-29 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +18.7% | +8.4% |
| 2022-12-19 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +14.1% | +12.7% |
| 2018-10-29 | 71/100 | Downtrend | +18.8% | +10.7% |
| 2022-10-14 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +37.7% | +21.3% |
| 2021-12-20 | 70/100 | Consolidation | +1.6% | +4.7% |
| 2022-05-03 | 69/100 | Downtrend | +0.8% | +3.4% |
| 2025-02-27 | 69/100 | Consolidation | -11.2% | -4.1% |
| 2018-03-19 | 67/100 | Consolidation | +6.5% | +0.0% |
| 2019-10-07 | 67/100 | Consolidation | +25.6% | +36.4% |
| 2026-06-23 | 67/100 | Consolidation | -1.0% | +3.8% |
| 2022-01-25 | 67/100 | Consolidation | +1.9% | +7.8% |
| 2018-12-27 | 66/100 | Downtrend | +18.6% | +31.7% |
| 2026-06-03 | 65/100 | Consolidation | -5.0% | +15.8% |
| 2025-09-29 | 64/100 | Downtrend | -7.6% | +3.3% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
28d ago · $141.25
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $141.25
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $143.10
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $143.10
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $140.37
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $140.37
Evidence: 8 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
64
$140.58
Now
44
$123.80
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
63
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
9
Risk
42
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
53
Institutional
75
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING ARES...
Recent media coverage of Ares Management has highlighted its strong stock performance, with a **28.8% gain over six months**, driven by robust assets under management (AUM) growth, acquisitions, and shareholder returns. The company’s focus on **alternative real estate investments**—particularly a **$435 million student housing deal** with Scion Group—has been emphasized as a key growth lever. Analysts also note its appeal as a **dividend growth stock**, though concerns about rising debt and valuation remain. The firm’s broader market momentum aligns with broader investor optimism amid potential Federal Reserve rate stability.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ares Management. News trend score: 74. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
39
Fundamentals
53
Technical
9
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-4%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **herding** is dominant, as ARES underperformed peers today (-1.1% vs. -1.4%), indicating synchronized positioning. The narrative gap (60 vs. 38) implies optimism persists despite weak momentum (-1.1% ROC) and neutral volume, consistent with detached euphoria (12.1% above 200-day avg). Overconfidence may linger due to revenue growth outpacing price performance, but no clear panic or FOMO is evident. The key question: *Will the gap between narrative and reality widen further, or will peer underperformance trigger rebalancing?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:13 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$435 million student housing deal increases exposure to student housing (Articles 5, 6)"
"¥612 billion Japan Logistics fund closed at hard cap, nearly 50% larger than 2021 (Articles 11, 12)"
"Highlighted as elite dividend growth machine with attractive yield (Articles 3, 4)"
"Stocks soaring after Fed Governor Waller’s disinflation comments (Articles 9, 10)"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological clashes between growth-focused and risk-averse investors. At one extreme, **Edgar Lawrence Smith** and **Peter Lynch**—both drawn to long-term potential—see it as either a ‘buy-and-hold’ candidate or lacking sufficient growth data to dismiss outright, while **Samuel Armstrong Nelson** flags a cyclical buying opportunity near oversold levels. Meanwhile, **Fisher** and **Mackay** strike a cautious middle ground, with Fisher calling it solid but not exceptional and Mackay warning of crowd-driven excitement. On the other end, **Graham**, **Bagehot**, and **Livermore** either lack enough data to form a clear opinion or see no compelling trend, while **Marks**, **Loeb**, and **Schwager**—all wary of risk and valuation—paint a picture of overpricing or instability. Even the **efficient-market theorists** and **Housel** dismiss it as either unselectable or volatile enough to deter patient investors, underscoring a tension between speculative potential and structural red flags.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 74
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 70
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 35
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 35
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 21
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 12
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
11.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
12.3%
ROA
1.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$488.90M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 16.6.2026 | $1.350 |
| 15.6.2026 | $1.350 |
| 17.3.2026 | $1.350 |
| 16.3.2026 | $1.350 |
| 17.12.2025 | $1.120 |
| 16.12.2025 | $1.120 |
| 16.9.2025 | $1.120 |
| 15.9.2025 | $1.120 |
| 16.6.2025 | $1.120 |
| 15.6.2025 | $1.120 |
| 17.3.2025 | $1.120 |
| 16.3.2025 | $1.120 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 8 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
CRE Daily · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Ares Management (ARES) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 44/100, rated "Weak" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ARES currently scores 44/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ARES's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 28.9%; Net income growth: 13.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.11 (3y annualized return 5.8% / max drawdown 51.3%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — ARES has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 3 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacobson Blair | Gift | 20.8.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | — |
| ARES MANAGEMENT LLC | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 23,000,000 | -23,000,000 | $10.25 |
| Olian Judy D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 1,728 | +1,728 | — |
| Joubert Paul G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 1,728 | +1,728 | — |
| Naughton Eileen | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 1,728 | +1,728 | — |
| BUSH ANTOINETTE COOK | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 1,728 | +1,728 | — |
| BHUTANI ASHISH | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 1,728 | +1,728 | — |
| Lynton Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 1,728 | +1,728 | — |
| BUSH ANTOINETTE COOK | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 24,168 | +1,728 | — |
| BHUTANI ASHISH | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 35,799 | +1,728 | — |
| Naughton Eileen | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 8,586 | +1,728 | — |
| Joubert Paul G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 44,196 | +1,728 | — |
| Olian Judy D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 31,462 | +1,728 | — |
| Lynton Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.7.2026 | 34,196 | +1,728 | — |
| Phillips Jarrod | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 2,583 | -2,583 | $113.63 |
| Phillips Jarrod | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 325,226 | -2,583 | $113.63 |
| Arougheti Michael J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 82,957 | -82,957 | $111.31 |
| deVeer R. Kipp | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 82,957 | -82,957 | $111.31 |
| Arougheti Michael J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 1,364,548 | -82,957 | $111.31 |
| deVeer R. Kipp | Tax Withholding in Shares | 30.6.2026 | 1,165,599 | -82,957 | $111.31 |
| Jacobson Blair | Gift | 3.6.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | — |
| Jacobson Blair | Gift | 3.6.2026 | 1,103,221 | -8,000 | — |
| Olian Judy D. | Open Market Purchase | 20.2.2026 | 480 | +480 | $124.43 |
| Olian Judy D. | Open Market Purchase | 20.2.2026 | 29,734 | +480 | $124.43 |
| BHUTANI ASHISH | Open Market Purchase | 6.2.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $126.61 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,527,704 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 13,744,326 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology