Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$444.57
▲ $27.17 (+6.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:04 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$352.81B
Day Range
$420.00 - $445.00
52-Week Range
$192.43 - $739.67
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
Support
$411.51
Resistance
$614.14
AMAT is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+134.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $114.07 vs. price $444.57 (-74.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
74/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
87/100
Analog Quality
+1.2%
Median 40D Outcome
27/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+10.9% … +21.1%
🟡 Base
13%
+0.5% … +0.7%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-13.4% … -7.8%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.8%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
4 occurrence(s) · 25% historical success
Echo #2 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.6% | -2.6% … +2.2% | +0.7% |
| 10D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.6% | -6.8% … +8.4% | +1.5% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -8.6% … +14.2% | +2.5% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.2% | -6.9% … +8.2% | +5.1% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -2.1% | -8.6% … +8.1% | +7.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | 74/100 | Downtrend | -6.9% | +11.6% |
| 2024-12-23 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +11.5% | -7.5% |
| 2022-07-07 | 72/100 | High Volatility | +22.4% | -9.7% |
| 2022-04-28 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +0.4% | -13.7% |
| 2024-09-11 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +10.3% | -7.5% |
| 2024-12-06 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +2.8% | -10.0% |
| 2018-09-28 | 70/100 | Downtrend | -16.3% | -20.7% |
| 2025-02-18 | 69/100 | Consolidation | -10.8% | +1.2% |
| 2022-05-25 | 69/100 | High Volatility | -10.3% | -7.1% |
| 2025-04-02 | 68/100 | Downtrend | +0.8% | +23.9% |
| 2022-08-19 | 68/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -14.3% | +2.8% |
| 2025-06-02 | 67/100 | Consolidation | +16.8% | +4.5% |
| 2024-11-21 | 66/100 | Downtrend | -6.9% | -2.1% |
| 2025-09-05 | 66/100 | Downtrend | +33.7% | +56.5% |
| 2025-04-22 | 65/100 | High Volatility | +19.8% | +37.7% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $434.35
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 5 to 31 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
25d ago · $479.48
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
25d ago · $479.48
Evidence: 0 bullish / 10 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
26d ago · $484.19
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
26d ago · $484.19
Evidence: 1 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
26d ago · $492.32
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
26d ago · $492.32
Evidence: 1 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $492.32
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
27d ago · $492.32
Evidence: 1 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $492.32
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $492.32
Evidence: 1 bullish / 8 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $491.89
Evidence: -3.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
31d ago · $491.89
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $491.89
Evidence: 1 bullish / 9 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $505.03
Evidence: -4.9pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
32d ago · $505.03
Evidence: attention score 65/100
What happened after
32d ago · $505.03
Evidence: 1 bullish / 9 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
53
$508.33
Now
57
$444.57
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
40
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
83
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING AMAT...
Recent media coverage of Applied Materials has centered on its strong investor sentiment and market performance, particularly in relation to the broader AI-driven semiconductor sector. Analysts and commentators, including Wall Street analysts and TV personality Jim Cramer, have highlighted AMAT as a compelling investment, praising its growth potential tied to AI chip demand, record revenue, and earnings momentum. The focus remains on its upward trajectory amid industry trends, though some discussions question the sustainability of such optimism.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Applied Materials. News trend score: 100. Reason: 16 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
46
Fundamentals
83
Technical
40
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-28%
Market Narrative
77
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+35
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence in AMAT—driven by a 314% DCF premium—suggests investors remain detached from recent price weakness (-6.1% ROC) and stagnant fundamentals. The extreme narrative gap (28-point disparity) implies optimism outweighs technical signals, a classic overconfidence trait. Key uncertainty lies in whether fundamentals will justify the valuation gap or if price action will correct the disconnect. Low panic/selling scores (14) and muted volatility (0.73x ATR) further reinforce complacency despite neutral momentum. The open question: Will traders pivot from euphoric valuation to reality-based pricing?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:51 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI chip demand, record revenues, margin gains and strong earnings forecasts point to further upside potential"
"Wall Street analysts think Applied Materials (AMAT) is a good investment"
"Ultra Clean Holdings delivered strong Q2 results, with revenue up 24.3% year-over-year"
"Memory, other AI-related stocks lead the market’s top performers"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for AMAT reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors assess risk, valuation, and market positioning. Walter Bagehot’s high score and bullish liquidity verdict contrast sharply with Jesse Livermore’s near-bearish stance, as the former prioritizes resilience in systemic stress while the latter’s trend-following rules flag a downtrend. Meanwhile, value-oriented investors like Benjamin Graham and his Enterprising Investor variant dismiss AMAT outright, citing valuation gaps, while growth-focused thinkers like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Samuel Armstrong Nelson see it as a long-term hold or cyclically oversold opportunity. The middle ground—where investors like Howard Marks (cycle) or Philip Fisher hesitate—highlights AMAT’s mixed signals: strong fundamentals may exist, but either the market has already priced in growth or the volatility risks outweigh the upside for patient or disciplined investors.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 87
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 74
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 63
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 46
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 28
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 24
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
48.7%
Operating Margin
29.2%
Net Margin
24.7%
EBITDA Margin
30.8%
ROE
34.3%
ROA
19.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$8.71
Cash
$7.24B
Total Debt
$6.46B
Current Ratio
2.61
Debt/Equity
0.32
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2026 | $0.530 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.530 |
| 20.5.2026 | $0.530 |
| 19.2.2026 | $0.460 |
| 18.2.2026 | $0.460 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.460 |
| 19.11.2025 | $0.460 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.460 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.460 |
| 22.5.2025 | $0.460 |
| 21.5.2025 | $0.460 |
| 20.2.2025 | $0.400 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$444.57
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$114.07
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-74.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.2%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.2% | $5.88B | $5.40B |
| 2 | 3.1% | $6.06B | $5.10B |
| 3 | 2.9% | $6.24B | $4.82B |
| 4 | 2.7% | $6.40B | $4.54B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $6.56B | $4.27B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$5.70B
Terminal Value
$103.50B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$67.27B
Enterprise Value
$91.38B
Net Debt
$-786.00M
Equity Value
$92.17B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$25.27
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$20.40
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 16 positive, 0 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Applied Materials (AMAT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMAT currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AMAT's estimated fair value is $114.07, which is 74.3% below the current price of $444.57. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AMAT's technical score is 40/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 34.3% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.32.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $114.07 vs. price $444.57 (-74.3%); ATR: 4.9% of price; Free cash flow growth: -23.9%.
Yes — AMAT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 20 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRUNER JUDY | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $465.00 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 279 | +279 | — |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 279 | +279 | — |
| Hill Brice | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $479.25 |
| Hill Brice | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 128,613 | -7,500 | $479.25 |
| Sanders Adam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 125 | -125 | $650.91 |
| Sanders Adam | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 4,155 | -125 | $650.91 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 30.6.2026 | 30 | -30 | $736.05 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 30.6.2026 | 19,970 | -19,970 | $735.22 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 30.6.2026 | 1,599,873 | -19,970 | $735.22 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 30.6.2026 | 1,599,843 | -30 | $736.05 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 7,989 | -7,989 | $701.33 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 50,332 | -50,332 | $700.21 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 1,627,832 | -50,332 | $700.21 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 1,619,843 | -7,989 | $701.33 |
| Raja Prabu G. | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $633.53 |
| Raja Prabu G. | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 346,642 | -10,000 | $633.53 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 4,457 | -4,457 | $597.45 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 837 | -837 | $599.35 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 2,426 | -2,426 | $598.56 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Gift | 16.6.2026 | 17,000 | -17,000 | — |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 5,933 | -5,933 | $595.59 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 9,186 | -9,186 | $591.40 |
| DICKERSON GARY E | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 4,535 | -4,535 | $594.74 |
| Iannotti Thomas J | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 9,250 | -9,250 | $599.77 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,615,253 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 14,231,996 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
30.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology