Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$177.72
▼ $10.99 (-5.8%)
Market data updated: 09/18 11:39 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$186.61B
Day Range
$175.97 - $192.12
52-Week Range
$121.99 - $259.92
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$142.89
Resistance
$196.09
QCOM is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+14.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Death Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
79/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
-7.1%
Median 40D Outcome
9/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
20%
+6.3% … +36.5%
🟡 Base
27%
-0.3% … +0.3%
🔴 Bearish
53%
-9.9% … -4.6%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 20% (95% CI 7%–45%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -1.3%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 27% (11%–52%) | -1.2% | -5.7% … +0.4% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.8% | -4.6% … +2.4% | +0.4% |
| 20D | 20% (7%–45%) | -1.3% | -6.8% … +0.4% | +0.5% |
| 40D | 27% (11%–52%) | -7.1% | -9.1% … +3.0% | +1.7% |
| 60D | 33% (15%–58%) | -5.8% | -12.6% … +9.8% | +2.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | 79/100 | Uptrend | -7.5% | -14.5% |
| 2022-07-18 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +7.4% | -22.3% |
| 2025-01-23 | 77/100 | Consolidation | -5.1% | -21.9% |
| 2023-06-14 | 73/100 | Uptrend | -0.7% | -10.6% |
| 2018-05-23 | 73/100 | Consolidation | -0.1% | +12.3% |
| 2019-03-18 | 71/100 | Consolidation | +0.6% | +22.5% |
| 2026-04-27 | 70/100 | Consolidation | +65.6% | +13.9% |
| 2025-06-11 | 70/100 | Consolidation | -1.3% | +0.5% |
| 2019-03-01 | 69/100 | Consolidation | +5.2% | +20.6% |
| 2022-06-06 | 68/100 | Consolidation | -9.5% | -5.8% |
| 2024-08-30 | 67/100 | Consolidation | -3.0% | -9.4% |
| 2025-06-26 | 67/100 | Consolidation | +0.1% | +7.3% |
| 2023-07-31 | 67/100 | Uptrend | -15.5% | -17.2% |
| 2024-10-29 | 66/100 | Consolidation | -10.8% | -2.5% |
| 2024-10-15 | 66/100 | Consolidation | -6.1% | -9.7% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
17d ago · $170.48
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 17 to 42 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
43
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
67
Risk
40
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
79
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING QCOM...
Recent media coverage of Qualcomm has centered on its strategic expansion into AI data center infrastructure, with a major focus on its multi-generational partnership with **Amazon Web Services (AWS)** announced on September 9, 2026. Analysts highlight this collaboration as a potential game-changer, diversifying Qualcomm’s revenue beyond smartphones and opening new growth avenues in cloud computing. The company’s AI data center ambitions—backed by validation from Meta—are seen as undervalued, driving stock gains amid broader semiconductor sector momentum.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Qualcomm. News trend score: 98. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
46
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
79
Technical
67
Valuation
45
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
-17%
Market Narrative
76
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+35
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
QCOM’s psychology is dominated by **FOMO**, fueled by strong momentum (+8.3% ROC), elevated volume (1.17x avg), and perfect sentiment (100/100). The narrative-reality gap (33) hints at overestimation of bullish catalysts, while overconfidence (+8.3% price vs. -0.4% EPS growth) suggests traders may ignore fundamentals. Loss aversion (3-month decline) and lack of herding (outperforming peers) imply selective participation. The key question: *Is this momentum self-sustaining, or will profit-taking reveal overvaluation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:14 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Qualcomm announced a multi-generational product collaboration with Amazon Web Services to develop custom AI data center infrastructure"
"Amazon’s custom AI silicon push gives Qualcomm a fresh growth avenue beyond smartphones"
"Qualcomm's data center revenue is expected to scale from 2027"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for QCOM reflects deep contrasts in how these methodologies prioritize risk, growth, and market psychology. Walter Bagehot’s high score and bullish liquidity verdict contrast sharply with Benjamin Graham’s near-failure of defensive metrics, illustrating a tension between resilience in downturns and traditional value investing. Meanwhile, the mid-range scores from Fisher and Marks suggest a business with merit but already priced for optimism, while Peter Lynch and Jesse Livermore’s low scores flag it as either lacking growth justification or trending against momentum. The extremes—from Smith’s decade-long buy-and-hold candidate to Nelson’s overbought cycle warning—highlight whether the stock’s appeal lies in long-term fundamentals or speculative fervor, with efficient-market skeptics like Malkiel and Bogle dismissing it as unworthy of active selection.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 88
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 75
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 66
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 59
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 44
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 40
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 40
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 31
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 23
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 4
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
55.4%
Operating Margin
27.9%
Net Margin
12.5%
EBITDA Margin
31.5%
ROE
26.1%
ROA
11.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.05
Cash
$5.52B
Total Debt
$14.81B
Current Ratio
2.82
Debt/Equity
0.70
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.9.2026 | $0.920 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.920 |
| 3.6.2026 | $0.920 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.890 |
| 4.3.2026 | $0.890 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.890 |
| 3.12.2025 | $0.890 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.890 |
| 3.9.2025 | $0.890 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.890 |
| 4.6.2025 | $0.890 |
| 6.3.2025 | $0.850 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$19.19
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.87
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 4 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Qualcomm (QCOM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
QCOM currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
QCOM's technical score is 67/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 26.1% — strong; Current ratio: 2.82.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200; ATR: 4.1% of price; Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 19.1% / max drawdown 45.4%).
Yes — QCOM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 14 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 12 | -12 | $185.32 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 32 | -32 | $177.62 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 36 | -36 | $178.63 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 82 | -82 | $180.87 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 347 | -347 | $184.63 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 739 | -739 | $183.84 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 508 | -508 | $182.69 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 696 | -696 | $181.89 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 48 | -48 | $179.76 |
| Grech Patricia Y | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 0 | -208 | $170.00 |
| Grech Patricia Y | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 208 | -208 | $170.00 |
| Grech Patricia Y | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 625 | -625 | $162.85 |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 316.881 | -316.881 | — |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 44 | +44 | — |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 316 | +316 | — |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 171 | +171 | — |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 427 | +427 | — |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 316.133 | -316.133 | — |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 44.726 | -44.726 | — |
| Grech Patricia Y | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 441 | -441 | $160.74 |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 171.79 | -171.79 | — |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 427.856 | -427.856 | — |
| Grech Patricia Y | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 316 | +316 | — |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 164 | -164 | $165.34 |
| Palkhiwala Akash J. | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 260 | -260 | $161.77 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
33,718,025 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 34,577,216 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology