Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$458.65
▼ $1.88 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/17 07:58 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$75.90B
Day Range
$457.36 - $465.58
52-Week Range
$359.36 - $494.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
MSI is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-3.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 38.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 3.49
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
83/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+4.9%
Median 40D Outcome
69/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+4.1% … +6.3%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.2% … +0.1%
🔴 Bearish
33%
-8.6% … -2.6%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 40 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +3.0%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
1 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.9% | -1.8% … +3.0% | +0.6% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.7% | -1.9% … +3.7% | +1.0% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.0% | -2.4% … +5.5% | +2.1% |
| 40D | 80% (55%–93%) | +4.9% | +1.9% … +7.7% | +4.0% |
| 60D | 80% (55%–93%) | +9.1% | +5.1% … +12.4% | +6.6% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-22 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +0.3% | +4.7% |
| 2022-01-12 | 80/100 | Consolidation | -13.6% | -6.8% |
| 2017-08-15 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -2.2% | +5.4% |
| 2018-04-06 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +3.9% | +12.1% |
| 2026-03-26 | 79/100 | Uptrend | -2.6% | -13.5% |
| 2021-03-09 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +7.3% | +18.5% |
| 2018-10-15 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +5.8% | -3.3% |
| 2021-09-28 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +5.2% | +13.2% |
| 2021-01-29 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +8.9% | +13.2% |
| 2018-12-14 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -8.6% | +10.6% |
| 2022-09-02 | 75/100 | Uptrend | -6.1% | +8.5% |
| 2023-12-22 | 74/100 | Consolidation | +6.0% | +12.7% |
| 2018-08-14 | 74/100 | Uptrend | +4.1% | +6.3% |
| 2020-12-23 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +3.0% | +9.1% |
| 2023-08-15 | 72/100 | Consolidation | -0.4% | +9.9% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
69
$485.39
Now
59
$458.65
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
43
Risk
44
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
74
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING MSI...
Recent media coverage of Motorola Solutions has centered on its financial performance and investor sentiment. The company reported strong second-quarter 2026 results, including a 24% year-over-year increase in non-GAAP earnings and 13% revenue growth, alongside an acquisition of counter-drone specialist D Fend Solutions for $1.5 billion. Despite this, its stock has faced slight declines recently, raising questions about valuation and near-term margin pressures, though analysts maintain a bullish long-term outlook.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Motorola Solutions. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
20
Fundamentals
74
Technical
43
Valuation
45
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+17%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Herding** state (score 44) reflects MSI’s underperformance relative to peers today, suggesting traders are aligning with broader sector trends rather than conviction. The narrative gap (3 points) hints at a slight disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, but no extreme bias dominates. Low FOMO/Panic scores (2/7) indicate neither urgency nor distress—just cautious following. The key question: *Is this herding a temporary tactical shift or a structural reallocation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:49 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wall Street analysts remain bullish on the stock’s prospects"
"reported second quarter 2026 non-GAAP earnings of $4.41 per share, up 24% year over year, alongside 13% revenue growth"
"Motorola Solutions (MSI) Faces Near-Term Margin Pressure"
"MSI powers communications and AI-enabled security across 46 venues"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some seeing potential while others flag it as risky or overpriced. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Thorstein Veblen both lean positive—Nelson spots a favorable cycle position near oversold levels, while Veblen aligns growth with real value creation—but even they acknowledge caution. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher offer lukewarm support, noting that while growth exists, the price has already baked in much of its upside or lacks Fisher’s signature exceptional quality. The split becomes starker with mid-tier investors like Jesse Livermore and Edgar Lawrence Smith, who see no clear edge or long-term holding potential, while the bottom half—including Graham’s strict criteria, Loeb’s risk warnings, and Bagehot’s liquidity concerns—paints a far more pessimistic picture, dismissing it as either statistically overvalued or structurally risky. The contrast highlights a tension between cyclical optimism and fundamental skepticism, with only a handful of methodologies finding even modest merit.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 88
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 66
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 59
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 54
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 33
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 32
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 23
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 7
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
51.7%
Operating Margin
25.6%
Net Margin
18.4%
EBITDA Margin
29.2%
ROE
89.4%
ROA
11.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$12.93
Cash
$1.17B
Total Debt
$8.41B
Current Ratio
1.04
Debt/Equity
3.49
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.6.2026 | $1.210 |
| 16.6.2026 | $1.210 |
| 20.3.2026 | $1.210 |
| 19.3.2026 | $1.210 |
| 15.12.2025 | $1.210 |
| 14.12.2025 | $1.210 |
| 15.9.2025 | $1.090 |
| 14.9.2025 | $1.090 |
| 13.6.2025 | $1.090 |
| 12.6.2025 | $1.090 |
| 14.3.2025 | $1.090 |
| 13.3.2025 | $1.090 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$14.26
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$44.34
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Motorola Solutions (MSI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MSI currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
MSI's technical score is 43/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 38.1%; Net income growth: 36.6%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 3.49; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; P/E: 36.1.
Yes — MSI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2026 | 37.66 | -37.66 | $472.23 |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 14,220 | -14,220 | — |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 1,600 | -1,600 | $485.16 |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 4,650 | -4,650 | $486.10 |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 5,570 | -5,570 | $483.68 |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 2,400 | -2,400 | $487.14 |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 14,220 | +14,220 | $81.37 |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 18,747 | +4,404 | — |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 0 | -8,808 | — |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 1,620 | +152 | $216.21 |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,282 | -166 | $477.69 |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 1,937 | +317 | $222.30 |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 17,650 | +4,404 | — |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,468 | -818 | $476.80 |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 2,286 | +349 | $244.17 |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,449 | -19 | $477.29 |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 0 | -152 | — |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 152 | -152 | — |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 349 | +349 | $244.17 |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 317 | -317 | — |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 349 | -349 | — |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 317 | +317 | $222.30 |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 818 | -818 | $476.80 |
| MOORE KATHRYN A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 152 | +152 | $216.21 |
| BROWN GREGORY Q | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 4,404 | +4,404 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,283,733 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,881,436 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology