Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$303.19
▼ $9.94 (-3.2%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:48 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$81.02B
Day Range
$300.68 - $313.38
52-Week Range
$252.84 - $705.08
Beta
—
Next Earnings
18.11.2026
Support
$271.70
Resistance
$372.98
INTU is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-55.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $629.31 vs. price $303.19 (+107.6%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
74/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
88/100
Analog Quality
+1.8%
Median 40D Outcome
29/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+7.0% … +11.5%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.2% … -0.2%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-24.1% … -6.9%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +3.4%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
3 occurrence(s) · 67% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.4% | -2.9% … +7.9% | +0.6% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +4.9% | -3.7% … +10.3% | +1.1% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.4% | -8.2% … +10.1% | +1.7% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.8% | -18.3% … +7.3% | +3.7% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | -2.4% | -11.3% … +14.1% | +5.1% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-08 | 74/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -0.2% | -30.1% |
| 2026-05-13 | 74/100 | Downtrend | -25.5% | -10.0% |
| 2026-04-23 | 68/100 | Downtrend | -19.9% | -24.4% |
| 2022-05-06 | 65/100 | High Volatility | +3.4% | +17.7% |
| 2026-06-23 | 63/100 | High Volatility | +10.2% | +21.3% |
| 2022-11-09 | 62/100 | Downtrend | +10.0% | +16.0% |
| 2022-09-02 | 62/100 | Downtrend | -5.5% | -9.6% |
| 2022-03-14 | 61/100 | Downtrend | +11.5% | -2.4% |
| 2022-09-23 | 61/100 | Downtrend | +5.9% | -2.7% |
| 2022-05-24 | 61/100 | High Volatility | +11.6% | +29.2% |
| 2026-06-08 | 61/100 | High Volatility | -10.9% | +12.3% |
| 2026-02-20 | 59/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +19.7% | +5.9% |
| 2022-10-14 | 59/100 | Downtrend | +7.3% | +4.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | 58/100 | Downtrend | -30.1% | -29.7% |
| 2022-01-18 | 56/100 | Consolidation | -1.9% | -12.5% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
72
$357.46
Now
59
$303.19
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
47
Value
62
Momentum
23
Risk
46
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
81
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING INTU...
Recent media coverage of Intuit has primarily focused on its stock volatility and market performance, with the company’s shares down **47.6% over the past year**, trading around **$342.94** in mid-September 2026. Analysts note wide-ranging expectations for its future price movement, between **$210 and $705**, while the broader software sector faces scrutiny over AI’s impact on core businesses. Additionally, Intuit’s CFO, Sandeep Aujla, is set to speak at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference, though no major announcements were highlighted in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Intuit. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
35
Fundamentals
81
Technical
23
Valuation
62
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
39
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
INTU’s psychology profile is fragmented, with **Panic Selling** as the highest-scoring state (30) despite muted volume and volatility. The negative ROC (-13.1%) and neutral RSI (37) suggest cautious, risk-averse behavior rather than outright panic, while the narrative gap (-3) hints at a slight disconnect between market sentiment (positive) and technical signals. The absence of extreme biases (e.g., overconfidence, anchoring) implies a balanced, fact-based approach—though the peer underperformance (-4.1%) may signal lingering skepticism. The key question: *Is the selling driven by fundamentals or speculative positioning?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:12 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Intuit stock trades at about $342.94, down 47.6% over the trailing twelve months. The options market has now priced how far it can travel from here, and the band is wide: a floor near $210 and a ceiling near $705.1"
"Intuit announced today that Sandeep Aujla, chief financial officer, will present at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference"
"Intuit Inc. (Nasdaq: INTU), the global financial technology platform that makes Intuit TurboTax, Credit Karma, QuickBooks, Mailchimp, and Intuit Enterprise Suite"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Nelson’s cycle‑position rule, the model estimates INTU is nearer oversold, giving a high 91 score, while Mackay’s crowd‑sentiment test also rates it favorably at 80. In contrast, Graham’s value screens and the efficient‑market view assign mid‑to‑low scores (54 and 45) because the stock does not appear cheap enough or provide a clear edge over an index. Fisher, Lynch and Veblen see solid growth but note that price already reflects much of it, resulting in moderate scores in the mid‑60s. The most bearish assessments from Schwager (23) and Livermore (7) stem from their trend‑following and setup‑discipline criteria, which flag the stock as lacking a positive trend or a clear trading setup.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 65
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 65
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 64
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 60
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 56
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 54
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 25
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 9
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
27.4%
Net Margin
21.3%
EBITDA Margin
27.4%
ROE
24.0%
ROA
12.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$16.53
Cash
$4.71B
Total Debt
$7.67B
Current Ratio
1.51
Debt/Equity
0.40
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 9.7.2026 | $1.200 |
| 8.7.2026 | $1.200 |
| 9.4.2026 | $1.200 |
| 8.4.2026 | $1.200 |
| 9.1.2026 | $1.200 |
| 8.1.2026 | $1.200 |
| 9.10.2025 | $1.200 |
| 8.10.2025 | $1.200 |
| 10.7.2025 | $1.040 |
| 9.7.2025 | $1.040 |
| 10.4.2025 | $1.040 |
| 9.4.2025 | $1.040 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$303.19
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$629.31
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+107.6%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
14.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.3% | $9.90B | $9.08B |
| 2 | 11.3% | $11.02B | $9.28B |
| 3 | 8.4% | $11.95B | $9.23B |
| 4 | 5.4% | $12.60B | $8.93B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $12.92B | $8.39B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$8.66B
Terminal Value
$203.67B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$132.37B
Enterprise Value
$177.28B
Net Debt
$2.96B
Equity Value
$174.32B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$68.56
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.33
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Intuit (INTU) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
INTU currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, INTU's estimated fair value is $629.31, which is 107.6% above the current price of $303.19. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
INTU's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $629.31 vs. price $303.19 (+107.6%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 20.4%; Free cash flow growth: 41.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.7% of price; Calmar: -0.25 (3y annualized return -17.0% / max drawdown 68.4%).
Yes — INTU has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DALZELL RICHARD L | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 285 | -285 | $325.36 |
| Hotz Lauren D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,063.005 | -1,063.005 | $359.30 |
| Aujla Sandeep | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 7,215 | +7,215 | — |
| Cozzens Tyler Ralph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 1,859 | +1,859 | — |
| Hotz Lauren D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 2,019 | -2,019 | — |
| Cozzens Tyler Ralph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 1,859 | -1,859 | — |
| Hilliard Caryl Lyn | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 958.097 | -958.097 | $359.30 |
| Aujla Sandeep | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 7,215 | -7,215 | — |
| Hanebrink Anton | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 2,720.571 | -2,720.571 | $359.30 |
| Goodarzi Sasan K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 26,188.536 | +26,188.536 | — |
| Aujla Sandeep | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 3,704.904 | -3,704.904 | $359.30 |
| Hanebrink Anton | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 5,247 | -5,247 | — |
| Hilliard Caryl Lyn | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 2,166 | +2,166 | — |
| Hilliard Caryl Lyn | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 2,166 | -2,166 | — |
| Hotz Lauren D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 2,019 | +2,019 | — |
| Hanebrink Anton | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 5,247 | +5,247 | — |
| Goodarzi Sasan K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 26,188.536 | -26,188.536 | — |
| Goodarzi Sasan K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 12,377.444 | -12,377.444 | $359.30 |
| Cozzens Tyler Ralph | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 767.585 | -767.585 | $359.30 |
| Hotz Lauren D | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,690 | -845 | $346.57 |
| Hotz Lauren D | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,628 | -62 | $346.15 |
| Hotz Lauren D | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 844.537 | -844.537 | $346.57 |
| Hotz Lauren D | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 62.405 | -62.405 | $346.15 |
| Hilliard Caryl Lyn | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 264 | +264 | — |
| Cozzens Tyler Ralph | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 207 | +207 | $345.66 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,950,442 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 12,142,132 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology