Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$34.40
▼ $0.26 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:38 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$31.02B
Day Range
$33.77 - $35.15
52-Week Range
$17.56 - $36.23
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$23.26
Resistance
$36.23
HPQ is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+21.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.32
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
79/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
88/100
Analog Quality
-2.9%
Median 40D Outcome
53/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+7.4% … +10.1%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.6% … -0.6%
🔴 Bearish
53%
-11.0% … -6.1%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -2.0%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
13 occurrence(s) · 46% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.6% | -3.6% … +2.0% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | -1.7% | -7.9% … +3.7% | +0.8% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | -2.0% | -8.1% … +7.6% | +1.5% |
| 40D | 47% (25%–70%) | -2.9% | -8.8% … +15.0% | +2.0% |
| 60D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.3% | -4.9% … +11.9% | +2.7% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-08 | 79/100 | Uptrend | +5.4% | -2.9% |
| 2021-03-09 | 75/100 | Uptrend | +7.2% | -0.6% |
| 2020-12-10 | 72/100 | Uptrend | +11.3% | +30.6% |
| 2024-06-11 | 69/100 | High Volatility | -0.6% | -6.9% |
| 2018-03-13 | 69/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -8.6% | -0.3% |
| 2021-12-22 | 67/100 | Uptrend | -6.5% | +0.7% |
| 2022-05-17 | 66/100 | Uptrend | -13.1% | -12.5% |
| 2022-06-06 | 65/100 | Uptrend | -21.1% | -27.4% |
| 2021-02-23 | 65/100 | Uptrend | +8.0% | +16.1% |
| 2021-04-22 | 65/100 | Uptrend | -5.1% | -18.3% |
| 2021-01-15 | 64/100 | Uptrend | +7.9% | +31.9% |
| 2026-06-05 | 64/100 | High Volatility | -10.2% | +22.4% |
| 2022-01-11 | 64/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -2.0% | +2.2% |
| 2024-07-23 | 64/100 | Uptrend | -7.7% | -1.4% |
| 2024-05-24 | 63/100 | Uptrend | +10.7% | +7.7% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
8d ago · $35.41
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 64)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
14d ago · $32.64
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 60)
What happened after
17d ago · $32.39
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 61)
What happened after
17d ago · $32.39
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 24 to 56 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
47
Value
55
Momentum
91
Risk
32
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
51
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING HPQ...
Recent media coverage of HP Inc. has primarily focused on its strategic push into AI-driven technology, with a notable announcement of new **OmniBook laptops and OmniDesk computers** designed to enhance AI capabilities. While broader market comparisons with competitors like Dell and Apple were briefly mentioned, HP’s recent headlines are limited to this product launch, with no significant financial or operational developments highlighted in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about HP Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
46
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
51
Technical
91
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+46%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+31
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant euphoria for HPQ reflects a disconnect between technical strength and fundamental growth, with extreme sentiment (100/100) and a 30% premium over its 200-day baseline. Overconfidence is present but muted, as price momentum exceeds earnings growth, suggesting traders may be ignoring valuation risks. The narrative gap (33 points) hints at a potential misalignment between hype and reality, though the lack of panic or loss aversion keeps the bias constructive. The key question is whether the momentum remains self-sustaining or if fundamentals will eventually reassert themselves.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:09 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"HP Introduces AI-Focused OmniBook Laptops, OmniDesk Computer"
"The World’s Thinnest NVIDIA RTX Spark™ laptops bring personal agents, local AI and advanced creation experiences"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 18D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 71/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for HPQ reflects deep methodological divides between value, growth, and market-structure perspectives. The highest-scoring approaches—Livermore’s trend-following (69) and Graham’s traditional value tests (67)—still flag uncertainty, suggesting the stock lacks clear momentum or margin-of-safety metrics. Meanwhile, the lowest scores (Nelson’s 4, Veblen’s 17) highlight cyclical overreach and conspicuous consumption traits, while Fisher’s 14 and Marks’ 28 underscore a failure to meet growth-quality or risk-adjusted thresholds. The middle ground—from Smith’s 63 (reasonable but not a hold) to Bagehot’s 38 (liquidity risk)—shows a consensus that the stock’s risks outweigh its rewards under most disciplined frameworks, with only a few methodologies tolerating it as a short-term or opportunistic play.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 71
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 40
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 30
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 29
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 28
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 28
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 18
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 16
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 14
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 0 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
20.6%
Operating Margin
5.8%
Net Margin
4.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
16.4%
ROA
6.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.67
Cash
$3.69B
Total Debt
$9.61B
Current Ratio
0.77
Debt/Equity
0.32
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 9.9.2026 | $0.300 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.300 |
| 9.6.2026 | $0.300 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.300 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.300 |
| 11.12.2025 | $0.300 |
| 10.12.2025 | $0.300 |
| 10.9.2025 | $0.289 |
| 9.9.2025 | $0.289 |
| 11.6.2025 | $0.289 |
| 10.6.2025 | $0.289 |
| 12.3.2025 | $0.289 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$15.39
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.38
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 7 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
HP Inc. (HPQ) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HPQ currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
HPQ's technical score is 91/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.32; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.7% of price; Current ratio: 0.77.
Yes — HPQ has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Ma. Fatima | Gift | 1.9.2026 | 12,176 | +12,176 | — |
| Francisco Ma. Fatima | Gift | 1.9.2026 | 12,176 | -12,176 | — |
| Francisco Ma. Fatima | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 12,176 | +12,176 | — |
| Francisco Ma. Fatima | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 12,176 | -12,176 | — |
| McQuarrie David P. | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 21,048 | -21,048 | $29.98 |
| McQuarrie David P. | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 39,580 | -21,048 | $29.98 |
| PARKHILL KAREN L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.8.2026 | 166,746 | +166,746 | — |
| PARKHILL KAREN L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.8.2026 | 166,746 | -166,746 | — |
| PARKHILL KAREN L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 69,173 | -69,173 | $28.52 |
| PARKHILL KAREN L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.8.2026 | 268,880 | +166,746 | — |
| PARKHILL KAREN L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.8.2026 | 152,672 | -166,746 | — |
| PARKHILL KAREN L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.8.2026 | 199,707 | -69,173 | $28.52 |
| McQuarrie David P. | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 10,524 | -10,524 | $27.98 |
| McQuarrie David P. | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 60,628 | -10,524 | $27.98 |
| McQuarrie David P. | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 10,524 | -10,524 | $27.88 |
| McQuarrie David P. | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 71,152 | -10,524 | $27.88 |
| McQuarrie David P. | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 10,524 | -10,524 | $27.98 |
| McQuarrie David P. | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 81,676 | -10,524 | $27.98 |
| Grewal Manpreet | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.7.2026 | 5,513 | -5,513 | $24.63 |
| Grewal Manpreet | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 22,637 | -22,637 | — |
| Grewal Manpreet | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 22,637 | +22,637 | — |
| Grewal Manpreet | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 22,637 | +22,637 | — |
| Grewal Manpreet | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.7.2026 | 17,124 | -5,513 | $24.63 |
| Grewal Manpreet | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.7.2026 | 45,272 | -22,637 | — |
| McQuarrie David P. | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 10,524 | -10,524 | $24.68 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
77,162,192 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 77,988,801 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 65.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology