Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$29.01
▼ $1.20 (-4.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:27 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$17.37B
Day Range
$28.90 - $30.21
52-Week Range
$17.78 - $31.65
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$24.97
Resistance
$31.65
GEN is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+0.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $38.60 vs. price $29.01 (+33.1%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.40
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
77/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
-0.9%
Median 40D Outcome
74/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
33%
+5.0% … +7.1%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.3% … +0.2%
🔴 Bearish
53%
-6.0% … -3.0%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 33% (95% CI 15%–58%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -2.9%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
8 occurrence(s) · 25% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
3 occurrence(s) · 67% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (15%–58%) | -0.1% | -3.7% … +1.6% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.4% | -1.7% … +3.0% | +0.3% |
| 20D | 33% (15%–58%) | -2.9% | -3.6% … +4.4% | +0.5% |
| 40D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.9% | -5.7% … +4.9% | +0.6% |
| 60D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.5% | -6.0% … +6.7% | +0.7% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-14 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.1% | -6.8% |
| 2021-07-19 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.6% | -2.5% |
| 2019-09-26 | 77/100 | Uptrend | -3.0% | +7.5% |
| 2022-03-09 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -3.5% | -11.0% |
| 2017-10-10 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -9.2% | -6.6% |
| 2024-12-17 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -6.3% | -5.4% |
| 2025-09-02 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -3.8% | -9.6% |
| 2021-06-18 | 74/100 | Uptrend | -2.9% | -2.4% |
| 2024-01-05 | 73/100 | Uptrend | -5.8% | -1.5% |
| 2024-08-06 | 73/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +7.1% | +10.2% |
| 2025-06-25 | 73/100 | Uptrend | +5.0% | -0.3% |
| 2021-02-22 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +3.9% | +29.2% |
| 2024-10-23 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +9.9% | +2.5% |
| 2025-05-28 | 72/100 | Uptrend | +5.0% | +12.5% |
| 2024-06-10 | 71/100 | Uptrend | +0.5% | +6.0% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202663
This Week
70
7D Ago
↓ -7
Weakening
Technical
49
7D Ago: 75
↓ -26
Fundamental
64
7D Ago: 64
→ 0
Growth
82
7D Ago: 82
→ 0
Valuation
62
7D Ago: 62
→ 0
News
92
7D Ago: 98
↓ -6
Quality
58
7D Ago: 58
→ 0
Risk
28
7D Ago: 28
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
16d ago · $31.33
Evidence: +3.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
16d ago · $31.33
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
16d ago · $31.33
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
63 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 2, 2026
Then
73
$30.02
Now
63
$29.01
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
58
Value
62
Momentum
49
Risk
28
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
64
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING GEN...
Recent media coverage of Gen Digital (formerly BlackBerry) has centered on market speculation about its potential turnaround, despite modest operational growth, with analysts debating whether its stock valuation reflects future gains. Insider selling by board member Ondrej Vlcek—twice in late August—has drawn attention, while the company’s acquisition of MoneyLion is highlighted as a strategic move to expand financial services and monetize its customer base. Technical analysts note a breakout setup, but overall, the focus remains on valuation, growth potential, and cautious optimism amid evolving business dynamics.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Gen Digital. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
25
Fundamentals
64
Technical
49
Valuation
62
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+20%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests **FOMO** dominates as momentum (+11.3% ROC), extreme overbought conditions (Bollinger %B 0.77), and perfect news sentiment (100/100) align with aggressive buying. The **narrative-reality gap (24 points)** hints at detached optimism, while **euphoria (40)** and **overconfidence (15)** reflect potential overvaluation despite the -23% DCF discount. The key question: *Will traders sustain momentum or pivot if volume cools or sentiment shifts?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:46 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Ondrej Vlcek, Board Member at Gen Digital, sold $4.42M in stock (article 4) and $1.38M in stock (article 5)"
"Gen Digital trading at $28.73 under 10x forward EPS (article 7) and strong growth, cash flow (article 8)"
"Gen Digital announced a $0.13 dividend per share (article 11)"
📈 19D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply, with growth-oriented investors like Philip Fisher and Peter Lynch seeing it as a standout opportunity—Fisher’s high score reflects exceptional company quality, while Lynch’s verdict suggests the price hasn’t yet reflected its growth potential. Meanwhile, more value-focused or risk-averse frameworks, like Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria or Walter Bagehot’s liquidity concerns, dismiss it outright, with Graham-enterprising even scoring it as near-worthless. The divide between high-scoring growth advocates and low-scoring cautionary voices highlights a fundamental tension: is this a high-quality, undervalued growth play (per Fisher, Lynch, or even Veblen), or a speculative, overvalued, or structurally risky bet (as flagged by Graham, Loeb, or Bagehot)? The middle-ground methodologies—like Housel’s moderate hold or Malkiel/Bogle’s skepticism—suggest it’s neither a slam dunk nor a clear miss, but rather a case where conviction is split between optimism and caution.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 88
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 86
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 42
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 27
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 4
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 6 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
78.5%
Operating Margin
42.4%
Net Margin
19.5%
EBITDA Margin
52.3%
ROE
37.3%
ROA
6.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.59
Cash
$411.00M
Total Debt
$8.20B
Current Ratio
0.40
Debt/Equity
3.14
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.8.2026 | $0.125 |
| 18.5.2026 | $0.125 |
| 17.5.2026 | $0.125 |
| 13.2.2026 | $0.125 |
| 12.2.2026 | $0.125 |
| 17.11.2025 | $0.125 |
| 16.11.2025 | $0.125 |
| 18.8.2025 | $0.125 |
| 17.8.2025 | $0.125 |
| 19.5.2025 | $0.125 |
| 18.5.2025 | $0.125 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.125 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$29.01
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$38.60
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+33.1%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
15.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.1% | $1.75B | $1.61B |
| 2 | 11.9% | $1.96B | $1.65B |
| 3 | 8.8% | $2.13B | $1.65B |
| 4 | 5.6% | $2.25B | $1.60B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $2.31B | $1.50B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.52B
Terminal Value
$36.43B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$23.68B
Enterprise Value
$31.68B
Net Debt
$7.79B
Equity Value
$23.89B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$4.22
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$16.93
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
PR Newswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Trefis · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
ChartMill · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.8.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
PR Newswire · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 17.8.2026
Zacks · 7.8.2026
Yahoo · 7.8.2026
Gen Digital (GEN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GEN currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GEN's estimated fair value is $38.60, which is 33.1% above the current price of $29.01. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GEN's technical score is 49/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $38.60 vs. price $29.01 (+33.1%); Revenue growth (last year): 27.1%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 52.4%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.40; Calmar: 0.34 (3y annualized return 15.2% / max drawdown 44.4%); Debt/equity: 3.14.
Yes — GEN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barsamian Sue | Gift | 9.9.2026 | 8,822 | -8,822 | — |
| Barsamian Sue | Gift | 9.9.2026 | 8,822 | +8,822 | — |
| Baudis Pavel | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| Chrystal John C | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| BRANDT ERIC | Gift | 9.9.2026 | 8,822 | -8,822 | — |
| Smith Sherrese M | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| Barsamian Sue | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| Denzel Nora | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| BRANDT ERIC | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| Smith Sherrese M | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 1,680 | +1,680 | — |
| HEATH EMILY | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2026 | 9,072 | +9,072 | — |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.9.2026 | 2,647 | -2,647 | $29.76 |
| Baudis Pavel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.9.2026 | 2,647 | -2,647 | $29.76 |
| BRANDT ERIC | Gift | 9.9.2026 | 8,822 | +8,822 | — |
| KO BRYAN SEUK | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 28,248 | -28,248 | $30.67 |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 128 | -128 | $30.02 |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 3,332,904 | -200,000 | $30.00 |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 200,000 | -200,000 | $30.00 |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 3,532,904 | -152,358 | $29.00 |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 152,358 | -152,358 | $29.00 |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 3,685,262 | -47,462 | $29.00 |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 47,462 | -47,462 | $29.00 |
| Vlcek Ondrej | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | $28.00 |
| Witteveen Travis Michael | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 440 | -440 | $28.06 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
34,856,688 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 30,047,240 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
74.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 72.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology