Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$31.40
▲ $0.80 (+2.6%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:31 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$1.14B
Day Range
$29.84 - $31.55
52-Week Range
$12.60 - $39.67
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$21.49
Resistance
$39.67
FTK is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+141.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 21/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 26.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.2% of price
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (74/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
72/100
Similarity
7
Historical Matches
69/100
Analog Quality
+26.5%
Median 40D Outcome
44/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
71%
+8.8% … +15.6%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
29%
-10.9% … -4.5%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 7 similar historical cases for this stock, 71% (95% CI 36%–92%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +8.8%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
2 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 29% (8%–64%) | -2.2% | -4.6% … +0.8% | +0.9% |
| 10D | 43% (16%–75%) | -1.3% | -3.5% … +6.6% | +2.5% |
| 20D | 71% (36%–92%) | +8.8% | +3.3% … +15.4% | +8.1% |
| 40D | 86% (49%–97%) | +26.5% | +10.3% … +43.6% | +23.8% |
| 60D | 100% (65%–100%) | +28.3% | +20.4% … +54.8% | +39.4% |
Sample size: 7 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | 72/100 | High Volatility | +22.3% | +89.5% |
| 2026-06-15 | 66/100 | High Volatility | +8.8% | +14.3% |
| 2026-06-01 | 64/100 | High Volatility | +15.6% | +16.0% |
| 2026-03-27 | 64/100 | High Volatility | -1.4% | +24.8% |
| 2026-03-12 | 59/100 | Uptrend | -14.1% | +28.3% |
| 2026-04-27 | 59/100 | Uptrend | +15.1% | +51.0% |
| 2026-04-13 | 48/100 | Consolidation | +7.9% | +58.6% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
72
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $31.40
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 37 to 63 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 18, 2026
Then
70
$30.60
Now
72
$31.40
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
85
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
69
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Flotek Industries, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
75
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Investors appear highly excited (75), but evidence of strong fundamental conviction is comparatively weak (42).
Psychology
91
Fundamentals
69
Technical
85
Valuation
45
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+39%
Market Narrative
88
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+46
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 5/100
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 76
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 70
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 66
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 38
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 33
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 29
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 28
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 10
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 5
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
25.2%
Operating Margin
9.8%
Net Margin
12.9%
EBITDA Margin
9.8%
ROE
27.0%
ROA
13.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.90
Cash
$5.73M
Total Debt
$40.00M
Current Ratio
1.80
Debt/Equity
0.35
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$3.13
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.13
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
MarketBeat · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 18.8.2026
MT Newswires · 18.8.2026
PR Newswire · 18.8.2026
Stocktwits · 17.8.2026
Motley Fool · 12.8.2026
Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 72/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FTK currently scores 72/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
FTK's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 26.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 147.1%; Net income growth: 190.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.2% of price; P/E: 37.4; Operating margin: 9.8% — weak.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for FTK.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLEMENT JAMES BOND | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 115,324 | -12,554 | $20.08 |
| CLEMENT JAMES BOND | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 127,878 | -3,187 | $19.61 |
| Hill Kathryn Anne | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 5,099 | +5,099 | — |
| Farber Evan R | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 65,994 | +5,099 | — |
| Agadi Harshavardhan V | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 202,364 | +5,099 | — |
| McDonald Kevin M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 5,099 | +5,099 | — |
| Ezell Ryan Gillis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 267,956 | -4,780 | $19.61 |
| Ezell Ryan Gillis | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 272,736 | +12,146 | — |
| Fucci Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 88,243 | +5,099 | — |
| CLEMENT JAMES BOND | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 131,065 | +8,097 | — |
| ProFrac GDM, LLC | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 13.3.2026 | 0 | -6,000,000 | — |
| ProFrac GDM, LLC | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 13.3.2026 | 6,000,000 | +6,000,000 | $0.00 |
| Ibrahim Christina M | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.3.2026 | 11,520 | +8,357 | — |
| Ibrahim Christina M | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.3.2026 | 8,357 | +8,357 | — |
| Ibrahim Christina M | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.3.2026 | 3,163 | +3,163 | — |
| CLEMENT JAMES BOND | Open Market Sale | 24.2.2026 | 122,837 | -6,299 | $16.02 |
| CLEMENT JAMES BOND | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.2.2026 | 129,136 | +15,151 | — |
| CLEMENT JAMES BOND | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.2.2026 | 139,472 | +16,635 | — |
| Ezell Ryan Gillis | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.2.2026 | 235,668 | +30,263 | — |
| CLEMENT JAMES BOND | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.2.2026 | 16,635 | +16,635 | — |
| Ezell Ryan Gillis | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.2.2026 | 260,137 | +36,595 | — |
| Ezell Ryan Gillis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.2.2026 | 223,542 | -12,126 | $16.02 |
| Ezell Ryan Gillis | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.2.2026 | 36,595 | +36,595 | — |
| CLEMENT JAMES BOND | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.2.2026 | 122,837 | -6,299 | $16.02 |
| CLEMENT JAMES BOND | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.12.2025 | 113,985 | -3,252 | $16.26 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,448,969 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,805,479 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 76.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology