Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$189.15
▲ $0.10 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/15 12:52 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
$25.47B
Day Range
$184.00 - $189.65
52-Week Range
$158.97 - $237.54
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
DOV is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+9.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 21.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $111.82 vs. price $189.15 (-40.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
79/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
+4.2%
Median 40D Outcome
68/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
73%
+6.2% … +11.0%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.5% … -0.4%
🔴 Bearish
13%
-8.4% … -7.3%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 73% (95% CI 48%–89%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +6.5%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
7 occurrence(s) · 71% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -0.8% … +2.7% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 67% (42%–85%) | +3.0% | -3.0% … +7.5% | +1.0% |
| 20D | 73% (48%–89%) | +6.5% | +2.4% … +10.1% | +1.8% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +4.2% | -3.1% … +12.8% | +2.5% |
| 60D | 67% (42%–85%) | +4.6% | -3.1% … +18.7% | +4.0% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | 79/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +11.1% | +21.6% |
| 2022-04-18 | 78/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -9.0% | -19.6% |
| 2023-11-01 | 77/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +9.4% | +17.4% |
| 2018-10-24 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +5.1% | -2.5% |
| 2023-06-01 | 75/100 | Downtrend | +9.3% | +6.6% |
| 2018-04-24 | 75/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +5.9% | +4.6% |
| 2025-09-29 | 74/100 | Downtrend | +6.8% | +20.0% |
| 2025-10-15 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +12.9% | +25.1% |
| 2019-08-27 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +11.9% | +22.1% |
| 2023-05-16 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +5.6% | +4.0% |
| 2022-02-18 | 73/100 | Downtrend | -0.5% | -14.5% |
| 2025-08-11 | 72/100 | Downtrend | -0.3% | +1.7% |
| 2026-05-22 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +6.5% | -3.6% |
| 2025-09-12 | 71/100 | Downtrend | -6.7% | +10.6% |
| 2025-01-10 | 71/100 | Consolidation | +10.8% | -17.7% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
12
Risk
54
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
69
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING DOV...
Recent media coverage of Dover Corporation highlights mixed investor sentiment, with a focus on its underperforming stock—down **13.9%** over six months, lagging behind the S&P 500’s gains. Analysts debate whether the stock, now oversold, may rebound due to higher earnings estimates. Separately, Dover’s subsidiary **Systech** (under Markem-Imaje) launched **TraceIQ**, a pharmaceutical traceability platform, signaling innovation in its serialization solutions. Dividend discussions also emerged, noting Dover’s steady payouts amid cash flow strength.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Dover Corporation. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
69
Technical
12
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-15%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests DOV is anchored near its recent support, with a 2.7% distance shaping trader expectations. Despite a 74% premium to DCF fair value and strong news sentiment (92/100), price momentum remains negative (-4.7%) and RSI is low (35), indicating mixed enthusiasm. Overconfidence (score 45) and moderate euphoria (35) reflect optimism, while low panic selling and loss aversion suggest limited fear. The key open question is whether price will hold above the identified support or slip further, which would test the anchoring effect.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 06:04 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Dover Corp (NYSE:DOV) recently announced a total dividend of $0.53 per share... with strong cash flow supporting payouts"
"Systech, part of Markem-Imaje and Dover, launched TraceIQ™, transforming pharmaceutical traceability from compliance to operational intelligence"
"Dover Precision Components unit introduced advanced product and material testing services through the Innovation Lab"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 22/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for DOV reflects deep methodological contrasts between cyclical, value, and growth-oriented investors. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-perfect score highlights a cyclical opportunity—positioned closer to oversold than overbought—while the top-tier compounders like Morgan Housel and Jack Schwager see disciplined, patient-friendly setups with favorable risk-reward. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher and Howard Marks (both) flag caution: Fisher dismisses it as merely solid, not exceptional, while Marks warns of potentially inflated expectations. At the other end, Graham’s strict value filters and Livermore’s trend-following rules reject DOV outright, contrasting sharply with the more lenient ‘buy-and-hold’ candidates like Smith or the efficient-market skeptics (Malkiel/Bogle), who see only weak evidence for active selection. The spectrum spans from ‘trend-following’ red flags to ‘quiet compounder’ potential, illustrating how technical, cyclical, and qualitative lenses clash with pure value or growth metrics.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 77
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 73
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 70
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 63
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 56
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 54
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 35
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 30
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 23
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 22
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
39.8%
Operating Margin
17.0%
Net Margin
13.5%
EBITDA Margin
21.7%
ROE
14.8%
ROA
8.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.99
Cash
$1.68B
Total Debt
$3.33B
Current Ratio
1.79
Debt/Equity
0.45
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.8.2026 | $0.525 |
| 29.5.2026 | $0.520 |
| 28.5.2026 | $0.520 |
| 27.2.2026 | $0.520 |
| 26.2.2026 | $0.520 |
| 28.11.2025 | $0.520 |
| 27.11.2025 | $0.520 |
| 29.8.2025 | $0.520 |
| 28.8.2025 | $0.520 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.515 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.515 |
| 28.2.2025 | $0.515 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$189.15
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$111.82
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-40.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1% | $1.13B | $1.04B |
| 2 | 1.4% | $1.15B | $964.58M |
| 3 | 1.8% | $1.17B | $900.78M |
| 4 | 2.1% | $1.19B | $844.13M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.22B | $793.79M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.12B
Terminal Value
$19.26B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$12.52B
Enterprise Value
$17.06B
Net Debt
$1.65B
Equity Value
$15.41B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$53.75
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.56
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
PR Newswire · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Dover Corporation (DOV) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DOV currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DOV's estimated fair value is $111.82, which is 40.9% below the current price of $189.15. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DOV's technical score is 12/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 21.5%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.45.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $111.82 vs. price $189.15 (-40.9%); Calmar: 0.35 (3y annualized return 9.4% / max drawdown 26.8%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -59.2%.
Yes — DOV has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yehle Jeffrey | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 173 | -173 | $204.38 |
| Yehle Jeffrey | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 2,640 | -173 | $204.38 |
| Woenker Christopher B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 97 | -97 | $204.28 |
| Woenker Christopher B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 43 | -43 | $204.28 |
| Woenker Christopher B. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 39 | -39 | $204.28 |
| Paulson Ryan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 30 | -30 | $204.28 |
| Juneja Girish | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 92 | -92 | $204.28 |
| Yehle Jeffrey | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 63 | -63 | $204.28 |
| Tobin Richard J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 1,835 | -1,835 | $204.28 |
| Tobin Richard J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 1,734 | -1,734 | $204.28 |
| Paulson Ryan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 37 | -37 | $204.28 |
| Cabrera Ivonne M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 183 | -183 | $204.28 |
| Cabrera Ivonne M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 175 | -175 | $204.28 |
| Tobin Richard J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 1,555 | -1,555 | $204.28 |
| Juneja Girish | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 97 | -97 | $204.28 |
| Moran James M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 26 | -26 | $204.28 |
| Paulson Ryan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 32 | -32 | $204.28 |
| Cabrera Ivonne M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 277 | -277 | $204.28 |
| Moran James M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 27 | -27 | $204.28 |
| Moran James M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 20 | -20 | $204.28 |
| Juneja Girish | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 83 | -83 | $204.28 |
| Moran James M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 10,537 | -27 | $204.28 |
| Moran James M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 10,511 | -26 | $204.28 |
| Moran James M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 10,491 | -20 | $204.28 |
| Cabrera Ivonne M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 72,005 | -183 | $204.28 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,049,726 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,916,478 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 20.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology