Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$56.95
▲ $0.02 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:46 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$4.31B
Day Range
$56.49 - $57.23
52-Week Range
$54.16 - $81.87
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$56.49
Resistance
$64.77
AOS is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-22.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.13 (3y annualized return -5.3% / max drawdown 39.4%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
79/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
+3.2%
Median 40D Outcome
69/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
67%
+3.4% … +7.5%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.4% … -0.2%
🔴 Bearish
20%
-8.8% … -4.8%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 67% (95% CI 42%–85%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +3.3%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
5 occurrence(s) · 40% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
2 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.9% | +0.4% … +3.0% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.6% | -1.2% … +3.1% | +0.2% |
| 20D | 67% (42%–85%) | +3.3% | -0.3% … +6.4% | +0.4% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +3.2% | -1.9% … +8.8% | +0.7% |
| 60D | 67% (42%–85%) | +4.8% | -2.0% … +10.0% | +2.0% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-11 | 79/100 | Downtrend | -0.5% | +3.1% |
| 2019-07-22 | 79/100 | Downtrend | +7.3% | +11.6% |
| 2026-06-04 | 78/100 | Downtrend | +9.5% | +3.7% |
| 2022-09-08 | 78/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -10.7% | +6.2% |
| 2025-06-13 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +5.4% | +13.6% |
| 2024-12-24 | 77/100 | Downtrend | +3.7% | -3.1% |
| 2025-01-10 | 75/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -2.7% | -11.8% |
| 2022-04-11 | 75/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -6.9% | -10.1% |
| 2019-10-09 | 75/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +14.5% | +4.8% |
| 2026-05-20 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +2.7% | +8.3% |
| 2022-12-21 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +5.2% | +16.9% |
| 2018-07-03 | 73/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -0.1% | -7.9% |
| 2025-04-03 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +7.5% | +6.4% |
| 2026-06-23 | 71/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +3.3% | -0.9% |
| 2025-11-05 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +1.8% | +15.6% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
28d ago · $63.08
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
28d ago · $63.08
Evidence: 6 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $63.80
Evidence: +4.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
31d ago · $62.99
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $62.99
Evidence: 7 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $61.29
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $61.29
Evidence: 4 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
63
$61.22
Now
53
$56.95
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
13
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
73
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING AOS...
Recent media coverage of A. O. Smith highlights mixed investor sentiment, focusing on its **long-term resilience** driven by strong replacement demand for boilers and water heaters, particularly in North America, alongside energy-efficiency trends. However, **near-term challenges**—including weak demand from China, rising operational costs, and margin pressures—have led to cautious analyst ratings and underperformance relative to the broader market. The company’s **dividend reliability and financial strength** are also noted as positives, though valuation concerns persist.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about A. O. Smith. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
84
Fundamentals
73
Technical
13
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior reflects traders’ focus on the 1.4% proximity to support, likely due to recent price action. Herding remains present but muted, as AOS’s slight underperformance aligns with peers, avoiding extreme deviation. The narrative-reality gap (7 points) hints at a disconnect between optimism (sentiment 80/100) and technical signals, which could either reinforce caution or trigger re-evaluation. The key question is whether traders will break free from the support anchor or hold firm as momentum remains negative. Low FOMO/Panic scores suggest no panic, but anchoring may persist until a clear catalyst emerges.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:59 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"A. O. Smith: Replacement demand supports long-term resilience"
"lacks a clear near-term catalysts given margin challenges"
"AOS benefits from strong North America boiler demand, acquisitions"
"analysts are cautious about the stock’s prospects"
📈 18D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each methodology, the model estimates that investors focused on cycle positioning and long‑term compounding—such as Nelson, Mackay, Housel, Smith and Veblen—assign relatively high scores, reflecting a view that the stock appears oversold, lacks crowd mania, and aligns with steady value creation. Mid‑range scores from Bagehot, Marks, Loeb and Schwager suggest more mixed sentiments, noting adequate liquidity, elevated expectations, and an ambiguous edge. Value‑oriented frameworks like Graham, the efficient‑market view, and Fisher produce lower to moderate scores, indicating the stock does not clearly meet their cheapness or quality thresholds. At the extreme low end, Livermore’s trend‑following rule yields a very low score, interpreting the price action as contrary to a favorable market trend.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 73
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 66
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 60
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 60
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 49
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 42
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 33
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 26
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 19
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
38.8%
Operating Margin
19.0%
Net Margin
14.3%
EBITDA Margin
21.2%
ROE
29.4%
ROA
17.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.87
Cash
$174.50M
Total Debt
$155.00M
Current Ratio
1.50
Debt/Equity
0.08
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.7.2026 | $0.360 |
| 30.7.2026 | $0.360 |
| 30.4.2026 | $0.360 |
| 29.4.2026 | $0.360 |
| 30.1.2026 | $0.360 |
| 29.1.2026 | $0.360 |
| 31.10.2025 | $0.360 |
| 30.10.2025 | $0.360 |
| 31.7.2025 | $0.340 |
| 30.7.2025 | $0.340 |
| 30.4.2025 | $0.340 |
| 29.4.2025 | $0.340 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$13.09
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$5.53
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 7 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
ChartMill · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
A. O. Smith (AOS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AOS currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AOS's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 29.4% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.08.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.13 (3y annualized return -5.3% / max drawdown 39.4%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — AOS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson Carrie L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 32,060 | +32,060 | $62.38 |
| Anderson Carrie L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 32,060 | +32,060 | $62.38 |
| Saak Aaron W | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.4.2026 | 2,296 | +2,296 | $65.34 |
| Kadri Ilham | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 2,262 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| Larsen Michael M | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 2,262 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| HOLT VICTORIA M | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 2,262 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| MAPES CHRISTOPHER L | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 2,262 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| Saak Aaron W | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 2,262 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| MARTIN LOIS M | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 2,262 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| Fister Todd W | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 2,262 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| SMITH MARK D | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 2,262 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| HOLT VICTORIA M | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 13,284 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| MAPES CHRISTOPHER L | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 8,684 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| SMITH MARK D | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 118,504 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| MARTIN LOIS M | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 6,445 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| Larsen Michael M | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 13,284 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| Kadri Ilham | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 23,579 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| Fister Todd W | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 6,356 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| Saak Aaron W | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.4.2026 | 2,262 | +2,262 | $66.32 |
| Schuh Darrell W. | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 1,104 | -1,104 | $74.39 |
| Schuh Darrell W. | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 2,201 | -1,104 | $74.39 |
| Carver Samuel M. | Gift | 23.2.2026 | 1,144 | -1,144 | — |
| Carver Samuel M. | Gift | 23.2.2026 | 2,713 | -1,144 | — |
| STERN JAMES F | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.2.2026 | 1,633 | +1,633 | $79.89 |
| Schuh Darrell W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.2.2026 | 1,460 | -1,460 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,484,081 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 10,605,640 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology