Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$79.62
▲ $0.19 (+0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:14 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$52.36B
Day Range
$78.94 - $80.33
52-Week Range
$55.03 - $95.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
08.10.2026
Support
$75.99
Resistance
$95.01
DAL is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+33.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 43.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.40
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
86/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
92/100
Analog Quality
-2.0%
Median 40D Outcome
48/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+8.3% … +13.4%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.3% … -0.2%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-13.4% … -4.3%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -0.2%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
5 occurrence(s) · 20% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.7% | -4.5% … +5.2% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 67% (42%–85%) | +2.9% | -5.1% … +6.2% | +0.6% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | -0.2% | -6.1% … +10.3% | +0.7% |
| 40D | 47% (25%–70%) | -2.0% | -5.8% … +17.0% | +2.4% |
| 60D | 60% (36%–80%) | +9.9% | -2.3% … +25.0% | +3.4% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-13 | 86/100 | Consolidation | -0.3% | +21.4% |
| 2017-09-08 | 82/100 | Downtrend | +9.6% | +11.5% |
| 2018-07-16 | 82/100 | Downtrend | +7.0% | +0.4% |
| 2023-03-09 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -12.5% | -3.6% |
| 2018-03-02 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -2.5% | +1.8% |
| 2023-05-09 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +11.8% | +30.4% |
| 2018-10-26 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +6.4% | -10.5% |
| 2023-04-14 | 79/100 | Consolidation | -1.6% | +42.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +15.1% | +28.7% |
| 2021-07-01 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -9.8% | -1.0% |
| 2023-08-31 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -13.7% | -16.4% |
| 2025-09-19 | 78/100 | Uptrend | -0.2% | +19.3% |
| 2024-07-17 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -15.5% | +9.9% |
| 2024-09-06 | 77/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +17.2% | +50.9% |
| 2025-01-08 | 76/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +10.9% | -39.3% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
55
Momentum
46
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
57
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING DAL...
Recent media coverage of Delta Air Lines highlights its financial resilience and strategic shifts amid broader airline industry challenges. The airline has seen a **10% year-to-date stock gain**, trading at a valuation under **12x earnings**, as investors favor its move toward **less-cyclical revenue streams** and strong consumer demand among older travelers. While competitors like American Airlines face stock declines due to profit warnings, Delta’s performance contrasts with industry-wide cost-cutting trends, such as reduced snacks and beverages. No major operational disruptions or scandals were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Delta Air Lines. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
46
Fundamentals
57
Technical
46
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
66
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior in DAL reflects a market where participants are aligning actions with peers rather than acting on independent signals. The narrow gap between DAL’s decline (-1.5%) and its sector peers (-1.3%) suggests a collective response to broader conditions, not idiosyncratic sentiment. While FOMO and panic signals are muted, the low narrative gap (-3) implies a modest disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, leaving room for further synchronization. The key question is whether this herding persists as external catalysts emerge or if divergence will reassert itself as individual drivers reappear.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:53 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"UBS Adjusts Delta Air Lines Price Target to $99 From $112, Maintains Buy Rating"
"Warren Jenson... previously served ... at Delta Air Lines"
"Stanley Druckenmiller buys this Warren Buffett airline stock in Q2"
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that investors like Mackay (score 90) and Lynch (score 80) view DAL favorably, noting an absence of crowd mania and growth that has not yet been priced in. Mid‑range scores from Veblen, Nelson, Schwager, Smith, and Marks suggest a generally positive but mixed view, highlighting alignment with real value creation, a favorable cycle position, disciplined risk/reward, and a good business whose expectations may be high. Lower scores from Graham, Housel, the efficient‑market camp, Loeb, Fisher, Bagehot, and Graham‑Enterprising indicate concerns about valuation, quality, liquidity and risk, leading these methodologies to be more cautious or neutral. The divergence arises because each methodology weights growth, safety margins, market efficiency, and liquidity differently, so the model estimates differing conclusions about the stock.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 80
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 79
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 69
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 51
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 39
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 37
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 21
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 20
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 6 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
50.5%
Operating Margin
9.2%
Net Margin
7.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
24.1%
ROA
6.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.72
Cash
$4.31B
Total Debt
$13.31B
Current Ratio
0.40
Debt/Equity
0.68
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 9.7.2026 | $0.215 |
| 8.7.2026 | $0.215 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.188 |
| 13.5.2026 | $0.188 |
| 26.2.2026 | $0.188 |
| 25.2.2026 | $0.188 |
| 16.10.2025 | $0.188 |
| 15.10.2025 | $0.188 |
| 31.7.2025 | $0.188 |
| 30.7.2025 | $0.188 |
| 13.5.2025 | $0.150 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.150 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$31.78
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$22.65
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Delta Air Lines (DAL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DAL currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
DAL's technical score is 46/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 43.7%; Net income growth: 44.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.40; Price is below the 50-day average; -7.4% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — DAL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sear Steven M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.8.2026 | 40,460 | -40,460 | — |
| Sear Steven M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 40,460 | -40,460 | $93.55 |
| Sear Steven M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.8.2026 | 40,460 | +40,460 | $51.23 |
| HUERTA MICHAEL P | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 3,100 | -3,100 | $94.12 |
| HUERTA MICHAEL P | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 32,525 | -3,100 | $94.12 |
| Sear Steven M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.8.2026 | 144,864 | +40,460 | $51.23 |
| Sear Steven M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 104,404 | -40,460 | $93.55 |
| Sear Steven M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 5.8.2026 | 0 | -40,460 | — |
| Bastian Edward H | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 206,510 | -206,510 | $92.80 |
| Carter Peter W | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 39,900 | -39,900 | $92.98 |
| BELLEMARE ALAIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 35,000 | -35,000 | — |
| Bastian Edward H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 206,510 | -206,510 | — |
| BELLEMARE ALAIN | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 35,000 | -35,000 | $92.72 |
| Carter Peter W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 39,900 | -39,900 | — |
| BELLEMARE ALAIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 35,000 | +35,000 | $39.78 |
| Carter Peter W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 39,900 | +39,900 | $49.33 |
| Bastian Edward H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 206,510 | +206,510 | $49.33 |
| Bastian Edward H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 1,569,958 | +206,510 | $49.33 |
| Bastian Edward H | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 1,363,448 | -206,510 | $92.80 |
| Bastian Edward H | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 0 | -206,510 | — |
| BELLEMARE ALAIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 130,025 | +35,000 | $39.78 |
| BELLEMARE ALAIN | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 95,025 | -35,000 | $92.72 |
| BELLEMARE ALAIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 0 | -35,000 | — |
| Carter Peter W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 464,604 | +39,900 | $49.33 |
| Carter Peter W | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 424,704 | -39,900 | $92.98 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
25,258,577 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 25,650,242 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology