Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$17.51
▼ $0.44 (-2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:55 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$645.28M
Day Range
$17.41 - $17.96
52-Week Range
$10.07 - $18.48
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$14.66
Resistance
$18.48
OSPN is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+7.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 22/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $21.00 vs. price $17.51 (+19.9%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.32 (3y annualized return 15.9% / max drawdown 49.8%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
77
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
5d ago · $16.85
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 14 to 43 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
16d ago · $16.76
Evidence: +4.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
16d ago · $16.76
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 29, 2026
Then
71
$16.54
Now
77
$17.51
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
58
Value
67
Momentum
94
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
76
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
🕵️ What the Detective found on OSPN
Detective Score 71/100 · 3 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
3 signals are currently converging on OSPN at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: Today's trading volume is significantly above the stock's normal average — a lot more buyers and sellers active in it than usual.
Why it matters: May indicate a significant change in trading activity, but doesn't allow a confident conclusion about price direction.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of OneSpan Inc. (OSPN) has primarily focused on its stock performance and financial analysis. Analysts discussed its high dividend yield, with comparisons to other tech stocks, while some maintained a neutral rating despite raising price targets. The company’s Q2 2026 earnings call drew attention, with updates on guidance and fair value reassessments. Investor interest centered on valuation debates and market positioning amid broader economic uncertainty.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about OneSpan Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
52
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
76
Technical
94
Valuation
67
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+30%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for OSPN suggests a **mixed but dominant euphoric bias**, where detached optimism (+21.8% above 200-day average) coexists with overconfidence in momentum (+5.9% ROC) despite trading 23% below fair value. FOMO is also present but secondary, driven by positive sentiment and near-overbought conditions. The key open question is whether this disconnect between valuation and momentum will sustain or if a correction could reveal overconfidence as a vulnerability. Narrative-reality gaps (19-point divergence) may further amplify detached expectations.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 11:15 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"reports solid Q2 2026 results with 11% subscription revenue growth"
"DA Davidson analyst raises price target from $14 to $16"
"raised full-year guidance despite hardware headwinds"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 78/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for OSPN split sharply between growth-oriented and risk-averse approaches, reflecting deep philosophical divides in investing. Peter Lynch and Thorstein Veblen both see strong growth potential—Lynch’s high score suggests the stock’s price hasn’t yet reflected its earnings momentum, while Veblen’s alignment with real value creation implies a sustainable competitive edge. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s mixed verdict and his enterprising investor variant’s lower score reveal skepticism about the stock’s margin of safety, as neither framework finds it a clear bargain. On the other end, risk-focused investors like Walter Bagehot, Howard Marks (market cycle), and Samuel Nelson flag liquidity risks, stretched valuations, or overbought conditions, with Nelson’s near-zero score signaling outright caution. Even moderate approaches—like those of Morgan Housel or Gerald Loeb—acknowledge the stock’s holdability but not its effortlessness, while Fisher, Malkiel/Bogle, and Schwager’s wizards outright dismiss it for lacking the quality, efficiency, or discipline-friendly setup they demand.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 78
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 77
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 59
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 45
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 41
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 39
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 16
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (11 bullish · 0 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
73.8%
Operating Margin
19.9%
Net Margin
30.0%
EBITDA Margin
24.1%
ROE
26.8%
ROA
18.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.91
Cash
$70.50M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.50
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.130 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.130 |
| 13.5.2026 | $0.130 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.130 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.130 |
| 14.11.2025 | $0.120 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.120 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.120 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.120 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.120 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.120 |
| 31.1.2025 | $0.120 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$17.51
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$21.00
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+19.9%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6% | $52.31M | $47.99M |
| 2 | 3.3% | $54.05M | $45.49M |
| 3 | 3.0% | $55.69M | $43.01M |
| 4 | 2.8% | $57.24M | $40.55M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $58.67M | $38.13M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$50.49M
Terminal Value
$925.19M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$601.31M
Enterprise Value
$816.48M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$816.48M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$6.99
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.07
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 10 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.8.2026
Motley Fool · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
Moby · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
OneSpan Inc. (OSPN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 77/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
OSPN currently scores 77/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, OSPN's estimated fair value is $21.00, which is 19.9% above the current price of $17.51. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
OSPN's technical score is 94/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $21.00 vs. price $17.51 (+19.9%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 28.8%; Net income growth: 27.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.32 (3y annualized return 15.9% / max drawdown 49.8%).
Yes — OSPN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.9.2026 | 3,055 | +3,055 | — |
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.9.2026 | 3,055 | -3,055 | — |
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.9.2026 | 897 | -897 | $16.70 |
| Mataac Lara | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 1,197 | +1,197 | — |
| Limongelli Victor | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 6,299 | +6,299 | — |
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 1,763 | -1,763 | — |
| Limongelli Victor | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.9.2026 | 3,199 | -3,199 | $16.70 |
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 1,763 | +1,763 | — |
| Mataac Lara | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.9.2026 | 352 | -352 | $16.70 |
| Limongelli Victor | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 6,299 | -6,299 | — |
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.9.2026 | 518 | -518 | $16.70 |
| Mataac Lara | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 1,197 | -1,197 | — |
| Jain Ashish | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.6.2026 | 1,693 | -1,693 | $14.26 |
| Jain Ashish | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 4,731 | -4,731 | — |
| Jain Ashish | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 4,731 | +4,731 | — |
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 20,000 | -20,000 | $14.45 |
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 91,018 | -20,000 | $14.45 |
| Jain Ashish | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 17,106 | +4,731 | — |
| Jain Ashish | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.6.2026 | 15,413 | -1,693 | $14.26 |
| Jain Ashish | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 14,193 | -4,731 | — |
| Mataac Lara | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 1,133 | +1,133 | — |
| Mataac Lara | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.5.2026 | 333 | -333 | $12.18 |
| Mataac Lara | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 1,133 | -1,133 | — |
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.5.2026 | 333 | -333 | $12.18 |
| Martell Jorge Garcia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 1,133 | +1,133 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,733,243 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,992,052 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
72.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology