Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$357.61
▲ $10.31 (+3.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:24 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.71T
Day Range
$351.35 - $363.28
52-Week Range
$289.96 - $495.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.12.2026
Support
$335.81
Resistance
$432.73
AVGO is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+3.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 15/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 23.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $144.19 vs. price $357.61 (-59.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
77/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
+14.7%
Median 40D Outcome
39/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+13.0% … +21.3%
🟡 Base
20%
-0.1% … +0.4%
🔴 Bearish
27%
-7.5% … -2.2%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +6.4%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
2 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Echo #2 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.6% | -4.7% … +4.6% | +0.6% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.7% | -2.3% … +4.4% | +1.4% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +6.4% | -0.7% … +14.4% | +2.4% |
| 40D | 93% (70%–99%) | +14.7% | +5.7% … +20.6% | +4.9% |
| 60D | 80% (55%–93%) | +20.5% | +12.9% … +25.6% | +7.3% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-04 | 77/100 | Downtrend | -2.5% | +16.2% |
| 2022-07-18 | 76/100 | Downtrend | +13.8% | -12.3% |
| 2026-01-27 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -0.1% | +26.2% |
| 2026-04-02 | 75/100 | Downtrend | +33.9% | +20.1% |
| 2022-09-20 | 74/100 | Downtrend | -11.8% | +16.5% |
| 2018-08-24 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +19.4% | +9.6% |
| 2026-03-19 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +27.1% | +23.2% |
| 2026-03-04 | 73/100 | Consolidation | -1.3% | +40.7% |
| 2018-05-04 | 72/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +12.1% | -3.8% |
| 2018-10-30 | 71/100 | Downtrend | +6.4% | +20.5% |
| 2022-06-24 | 70/100 | Downtrend | +0.8% | -3.1% |
| 2018-11-13 | 69/100 | Downtrend | +14.9% | +24.3% |
| 2022-10-24 | 68/100 | Downtrend | +13.3% | +25.0% |
| 2025-03-25 | 68/100 | High Volatility | -6.0% | +32.8% |
| 2026-02-13 | 67/100 | Consolidation | -0.1% | +28.9% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
5d ago · $344.72
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 32 to 1 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
29d ago · $368.45
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
29d ago · $368.45
Evidence: 0 bullish / 11 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $362.48
Evidence: -4.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
31d ago · $362.48
Evidence: המניה במגמת ירידה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $362.48
Evidence: 0 bullish / 10 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $380.12
Evidence: 1 bullish / 10 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
57
$381.35
Now
57
$357.61
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
17
Risk
62
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
83
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING AVGO...
Recent media coverage of Broadcom has centered on its growing prominence in the AI hardware sector, particularly amid competitive dynamics with Qualcomm and Nvidia. Analysts highlight Broadcom’s potential as a key player in AI infrastructure, with one firm setting an aggressive stock price target following strong earnings. While not directly featured in these headlines, its indirect association with AI-driven tech deals—such as Qualcomm’s Amazon AI silicon partnership—suggests broader industry momentum favoring semiconductor firms. The focus remains on valuation, market positioning, and AI-driven growth opportunities.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Broadcom. News trend score: 92. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
83
Technical
17
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-13%
Market Narrative
70
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AVGO’s psychology is dominated by **overconfidence**, as traders appear detached from fundamentals despite a 156% premium to DCF. The extreme narrative gap (75 vs. 43) reinforces this disconnect, while euphoria (35) and anchoring (13) suggest investors may ignore valuation risks. The lack of panic or herding signals stability, but the weak momentum (-1.3% ROC) and peer underperformance raise caution. The key question: *Will traders remain oblivious to the valuation gap, or will fundamentals reassert themselves?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:46 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Broadcom Q3 surge: 86% revenue growth, AI chip momentum"
"Top Analyst sets jaw-dropping Broadcom stock target after earnings"
"86% revenue growth"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 21D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 22/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a deep chasm between growth-oriented and value-driven methodologies. The top scorers—Peter Lynch, Edgar Lawrence Smith, and Philip Fisher—all see AVGO as a high-quality, long-term growth opportunity, with Lynch and Smith even suggesting it’s undervalued relative to its potential. Meanwhile, the mid-tier approaches like Jack Schwager’s disciplined trading and Samuel Nelson’s cycle analysis still find merit, though with slightly more caution. However, the divergence sharpens when contrasting these bullish perspectives with the more skeptical voices: Howard Marks (both his market cycle and general approach) and the efficient-market theorists, who question whether the stock’s premium justifies active selection. At the bottom, Graham’s value filters and Livermore’s trend-following rules outright reject it, while even Bagehot’s liquidity concerns and Loeb’s risk assessment temper enthusiasm. The debate thus hinges on whether AVGO’s growth trajectory justifies its valuation—or if it’s already priced for perfection.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 94
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 93
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 70
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 69
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 67
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 61
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 54
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 28
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 23
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 22
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
67.8%
Operating Margin
39.9%
Net Margin
36.2%
EBITDA Margin
39.9%
ROE
28.4%
ROA
13.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.91
Cash
$16.18B
Total Debt
$3.15B
Current Ratio
1.71
Debt/Equity
0.04
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 22.6.2026 | $0.650 |
| 21.6.2026 | $0.650 |
| 23.3.2026 | $0.650 |
| 22.3.2026 | $0.650 |
| 22.12.2025 | $0.650 |
| 21.12.2025 | $0.650 |
| 22.9.2025 | $0.590 |
| 21.9.2025 | $0.590 |
| 20.6.2025 | $0.590 |
| 19.6.2025 | $0.590 |
| 20.3.2025 | $0.590 |
| 19.3.2025 | $0.590 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$357.61
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$144.19
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-59.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $33.64B | $30.86B |
| 2 | 19.4% | $40.16B | $33.80B |
| 3 | 13.8% | $45.68B | $35.28B |
| 4 | 8.1% | $49.39B | $34.99B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $50.63B | $32.91B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$26.91B
Terminal Value
$798.39B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$518.90B
Enterprise Value
$686.74B
Net Debt
$-13.03B
Equity Value
$699.76B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$16.75
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$10.05
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
CNBC · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Broadcom (AVGO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AVGO currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AVGO's estimated fair value is $144.19, which is 59.7% below the current price of $357.61. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AVGO's technical score is 17/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 23.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 287.8%; Free cash flow growth: 38.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $144.19 vs. price $357.61 (-59.7%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — AVGO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 22 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brazeal Mark David | Open Market Sale | 10.7.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $401.33 |
| DELLY GAYLA J | Gift | 10.7.2026 | 500 | -500 | — |
| DELLY GAYLA J | Gift | 10.7.2026 | 30,826 | -500 | — |
| Brazeal Mark David | Open Market Sale | 10.7.2026 | 194,989 | -25,000 | $401.33 |
| DELLY GAYLA J | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 1,890 | -1,890 | $385.38 |
| Brazeal Mark David | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $379.19 |
| DELLY GAYLA J | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 31,326 | -1,890 | $385.38 |
| Brazeal Mark David | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 219,989 | -25,000 | $379.19 |
| PAGE JUSTINE | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 1,602 | -1,602 | $373.86 |
| PAGE JUSTINE | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 17,426 | -1,602 | $373.86 |
| Brazeal Mark David | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $387.00 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Gift | 24.6.2026 | 263,903 | -263,903 | — |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 217 | -217 | $388.17 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 47,510 | -47,510 | $385.61 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 6,478 | -6,478 | $386.39 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 21,603 | -21,603 | $377.64 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 33,346 | -33,346 | $378.51 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 49,805 | -49,805 | $380.57 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 41,290 | -41,290 | $384.63 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 43,302 | -43,302 | $384.58 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 25,134 | -25,134 | $382.62 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 26,889 | -26,889 | $382.63 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 36,661 | -36,661 | $381.68 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 24,073 | -24,073 | $379.69 |
| SAMUELI HENRY | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 53,722 | -53,722 | $385.57 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
50,451,889 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 61,196,152 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 31.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology