Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$25.55
▼ $0.23 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:01 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$15.09B
Day Range
$25.55 - $25.85
52-Week Range
$25.02 - $26.72
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$25.02
Resistance
$25.89
-3.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 22.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.07 (3y annualized return -0.6% / max drawdown 9.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
62/100
Similarity
7
Historical Matches
68/100
Analog Quality
-0.5%
Median 40D Outcome
93/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
14%
+1.2% … +1.2%
🟡 Base
43%
+0.2% … +0.5%
🔴 Bearish
43%
-2.6% … -1.7%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 7 similar historical cases for this stock, 14% (95% CI 3%–51%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.1%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
1 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Echo #2 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 0% (0%–35%) | -0.5% | -0.9% … -0.4% | +0.1% |
| 10D | 0% (0%–35%) | +0.2% | -0.5% … +0.3% | +0.0% |
| 20D | 14% (3%–51%) | +0.1% | -1.7% … +0.5% | +0.1% |
| 40D | 14% (3%–51%) | -0.5% | -1.3% … -0.3% | -0.3% |
| 60D | 14% (3%–51%) | -0.6% | -1.4% … -0.3% | -0.6% |
Sample size: 7 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-08 | 62/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +0.7% | -0.2% |
| 2026-05-27 | 60/100 | Consolidation | -2.8% | -2.6% |
| 2026-03-18 | 60/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +0.1% | -1.0% |
| 2026-05-12 | 58/100 | Consolidation | -2.4% | -1.7% |
| 2026-04-23 | 56/100 | Consolidation | +1.2% | -0.6% |
| 2026-06-18 | 50/100 | Consolidation | +0.4% | -0.3% |
| 2026-03-04 | 33/100 | Downtrend | -1.0% | +1.2% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity.
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
50
Value
60
Momentum
63
Risk
50
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
53
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Apollo Global Management, Inc. 7.625% Fixed-Rate Resettable Junior Subordinated Notes due 2053. News trend score: 80. Reason: 5 of the last 10 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
73
Fundamentals
53
Technical
63
Valuation
60
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-0%
Market Narrative
58
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+20
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 11/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of value investors such as Graham (both Enterprising and Defensive) and Mackay, the model estimates a deep statistical discount and an absence of crowd mania, reflected in scores in the mid‑90s. Long‑term compounding and cycle‑sensitive approaches from Housel, Nelson, Marks and Loeb also rate the stock positively, though with more modest scores (60‑80) that stress balance‑sheet strength and risk pricing. In contrast, growth‑oriented frameworks like Fisher, Lynch and Veblen assign lower scores, indicating the stock does not meet their exceptional quality or growth‑at‑reasonable‑price criteria. Trend‑following and market‑efficiency perspectives such as Livermore, Schwager and the efficient‑market view give the weakest endorsements, highlighting a negative trend and limited edge over a broad index.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 94
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 92
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 90
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 83
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 73
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 71
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 68
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 65
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 43
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 37
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 31
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 11
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$25.02
Range Bottom
$25.89
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
10.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
15.0%
ROA
0.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.58
Cash
$20.59B
Total Debt
$13.36B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.57
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.9.2026 | $0.477 |
| 1.6.2026 | $0.477 |
| 27.2.2026 | $0.477 |
| 1.12.2025 | $0.477 |
| 29.8.2025 | $0.477 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.477 |
| 28.2.2025 | $0.477 |
| 29.11.2024 | $0.477 |
| 30.8.2024 | $0.477 |
| 31.5.2024 | $0.477 |
| 29.2.2024 | $0.477 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$39.32
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$29.35
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 5 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 10 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.8.2026
Fintel · 20.7.2026
Apollo Global Management, Inc. 7.625% Fixed-Rate Resettable Junior Subordinated Notes due 2053 (APOS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
APOS currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
APOS's technical score is 63/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 22.7%; ATR: 0.8% of price; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.07 (3y annualized return -0.6% / max drawdown 9.0%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -24.4%; Net income growth: -23.7%.
Yes — APOS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,444 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,776 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology