Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$83.50
▲ $0.50 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:55 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$5.60B
Day Range
$82.42 - $83.50
52-Week Range
$68.80 - $93.22
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$82.03
Resistance
$93.22
+9.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $100.37 vs. price $83.50 (+20.2%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
55
Value
67
Momentum
32
Risk
64
Sentiment
26
Fundamental
65
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Ameris Bancorp has centered on its strategic growth, leadership changes, and financial performance. Analysts noted margin pressures and deposit competition during Q2 earnings, while the company reinforced its South Carolina leadership with new market presidents in key regions. Some investors remain cautious due to small-cap risks, though one firm raised its price target to $99, reflecting optimism. Options trading activity and comparisons to competitors like FB Financial also drew attention.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ameris Bancorp. News trend score: 26. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 6 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
65
Fundamentals
65
Technical
32
Valuation
67
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
23
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-29
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ABCB suggests a dominant **anchoring bias**, where traders may be fixating on the recent support level (2.1% above) as a reference point, despite weak momentum and negative sentiment. The narrative-reality gap (-30) further implies a disconnect between market pricing and fundamentals, consistent with traders clinging to outdated anchors rather than adjusting to current conditions. While panic selling (19) hints at cautious sentiment, the absence of euphoria or herding signals reinforces a lack of aggressive participation. The key open question is whether traders will break free from anchoring or reinforce it by holding near support.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"FB Financial's Southern States Bancshares acquisition surged earnings and loans, with analysts issuing Buy ratings and a 15% upside consensus price target."
"Ameris Bank ordered to pay ~$79.55M in whistleblower retaliation case."
"Ameris Bank Strengthens South Carolina leadership with new market presidents in Midlands, Charleston, and Greenville."
"Margin pressures and deposit competition shape Ameris Bancorp’s growth outlook."
📈 19D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Philip Fisher — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 40/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Philip Fisher’s documented principles, the model estimates the company’s quality is exceptional (score 100). Walter Bagehot and Edgar Lawrence Smith also rate it at the top, reflecting strong fundamentals and long‑term buy‑and‑hold appeal, while Charles Mackay and Morgan Housel give slightly lower but still favorable scores, noting lack of crowd mania and a solid compounder profile. Howard Marks, Gerald Loeb and Benjamin Graham (defensive) assign moderate scores, highlighting reasonable risk pricing and capital‑preservation but noting less margin of safety. The efficient‑market view, Schwager, Veblen and Graham’s enterprising framework assign sub‑60 scores, suggesting limited edge, mixed growth‑to‑profit signals, and insufficient cheapness, and Livermore’s trend‑following rule yields a low score due to a negative price trend. Consequently, methodologies that emphasize intrinsic quality and long‑term stability converge on positive assessments, whereas those focused on market efficiency, price valuation, or trend dynamics produce more cautious or negative conclusions.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 96
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 90
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 85
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 76
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 76
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 70
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 64
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 45
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 42
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
41.7%
Net Margin
31.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.1%
ROA
1.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.02
Cash
$1.09B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.04
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.200 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.200 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.200 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.200 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.200 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.200 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.200 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.200 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.200 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.200 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.200 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$83.50
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$100.37
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+20.2%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $406.61M | $373.04M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $439.65M | $370.04M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $467.12M | $360.70M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $487.56M | $345.40M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $499.75M | $324.80M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$369.64M
Terminal Value
$7.88B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.12B
Enterprise Value
$6.90B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$6.90B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$59.92
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$59.12
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 4 neutral, 10 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
MarketBeat · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
StockStory · 18.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.8.2026
Argus Research · 4.8.2026
Business Wire · 4.8.2026
StockStory · 4.8.2026
StockStory · 1.8.2026
Business Wire · 31.7.2026
Benzinga · 28.7.2026
Benzinga · 28.7.2026
Business Wire · 27.7.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 24.7.2026
Ameris Bancorp (ABCB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ABCB currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ABCB's estimated fair value is $100.37, which is 20.2% above the current price of $83.50. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ABCB's technical score is 32/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $100.37 vs. price $83.50 (+20.2%); Free cash flow growth: 162.7%; ATR: 1.8% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -6.7% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — ABCB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strange Douglas D | Gift | 19.8.2026 | 120 | -120 | — |
| MILLER JAMES B JR | Gift | 18.8.2026 | 22,279.16 | +22,279.16 | — |
| MILLER JAMES B JR | Gift | 18.8.2026 | 22,279.16 | -22,279.16 | — |
| STERN WILLIAM H | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.6.2026 | 271.505 | +271.505 | $87.48 |
| Bullard Rodney D | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.6.2026 | 214.346 | +214.346 | $87.48 |
| STERN WILLIAM H | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.6.2026 | 49,254 | +272 | $87.48 |
| Bullard Rodney D | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.6.2026 | 16,841 | +214 | $87.48 |
| Bullard Rodney D | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,003 | +1,003 | — |
| Choate William Millard | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,003 | +1,003 | — |
| Bowen William I. Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,003 | +1,003 | — |
| JETER DANIEL B | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,003 | +1,003 | — |
| HILL LEO J | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,003 | +1,003 | — |
| McLean Claire E | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,003 | +1,003 | — |
| LYNCH ROBERT P | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,003 | +1,003 | — |
| STERN WILLIAM H | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,003 | +1,003 | — |
| MILLER JAMES B JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,003 | +1,003 | — |
| MILLER JAMES B JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,581,518 | +1,003 | — |
| LYNCH ROBERT P | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 213,176 | +1,003 | — |
| JETER DANIEL B | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 47,097 | +1,003 | — |
| STERN WILLIAM H | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 48,983 | +1,003 | — |
| HILL LEO J | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 16,263 | +1,003 | — |
| Choate William Millard | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 11,000 | +1,003 | — |
| Bowen William I. Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 29,980 | +1,003 | — |
| Bullard Rodney D | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 16,627 | +1,003 | — |
| McLean Claire E | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 4,785 | +1,003 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,558,703 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,414,745 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 75.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology