Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Financials · ·
$544.33
▼ $1.37 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:06 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$48.08B
Day Range
$537.08 - $547.12
52-Week Range
$422.37 - $572.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$500.69
Resistance
$572.56
AMP is a stock from the Financials sector — Banks, insurance, and asset management — profitability sensitive to interest rates and credit cycles.
+10.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/22 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
90/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
94/100
Analog Quality
+3.3%
Median 40D Outcome
65/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
60%
+3.2% … +5.2%
🟡 Base
13%
+0.5% … +0.8%
🔴 Bearish
27%
-12.5% … -7.1%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 60% (95% CI 36%–80%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +2.2%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
2 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Echo #2 — Trend Acceleration
4 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.0% | -3.7% … +2.3% | +0.6% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +3.3% | -2.1% … +3.9% | +1.0% |
| 20D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.2% | -0.8% … +4.7% | +2.0% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +3.3% | -6.2% … +8.4% | +3.3% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.9% | -2.4% … +9.8% | +5.4% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-31 | 90/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -8.8% | -31.4% |
| 2019-06-28 | 88/100 | Consolidation | +3.2% | -0.2% |
| 2024-01-17 | 87/100 | Uptrend | +5.2% | +11.2% |
| 2024-06-06 | 86/100 | Consolidation | +0.4% | +3.9% |
| 2024-04-29 | 86/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +4.5% | +6.1% |
| 2019-07-30 | 86/100 | Consolidation | -15.7% | -3.4% |
| 2023-03-08 | 85/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -11.4% | -7.1% |
| 2021-11-29 | 85/100 | Consolidation | +4.1% | -1.5% |
| 2021-09-14 | 85/100 | Uptrend | +4.8% | +12.8% |
| 2021-12-17 | 85/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +8.3% | -0.1% |
| 2020-12-24 | 84/100 | Uptrend | +11.4% | +17.3% |
| 2023-08-14 | 84/100 | Uptrend | +0.9% | -3.2% |
| 2021-06-16 | 84/100 | Consolidation | -1.9% | +5.2% |
| 2024-06-28 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +1.1% | +8.5% |
| 2024-07-24 | 82/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +2.2% | +22.9% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLF (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
28d ago · $555.59
Evidence: 5 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $570.59
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
31d ago · $570.59
Evidence: 8 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $564.64
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $564.64
Evidence: 8 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
67
$564.75
Now
59
$544.33
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
53
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
59
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING AMP...
Recent media coverage of **Ameriprise Financial** has been limited and indirect, primarily focusing on broader financial and investment themes rather than specific company developments. The most relevant mention appears in a September 2026 report from *Investor’s Business Daily* and *Yahoo Finance*, where Ameriprise was grouped among financial advisory firms (alongside Charles Schwab and Robinhood) noted as being in or near "buy zones" due to favorable market positioning. No direct company-specific news or major developments were highlighted in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ameriprise Financial. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
49
Fundamentals
59
Technical
53
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+16%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AMP’s psychology is dominated by **herding**, as traders align with peers’ relative outperformance despite modest downside. The **euphoria** score (28) and **anchoring** (43) suggest traders may be fixating on resistance while ignoring overvaluation (+14.2% above 200-day avg.). The **narrative gap** (28) hints at a disconnect between rosy expectations (66) and fundamentals (38), but the absence of panic or loss aversion keeps behavior constructive. The key question: *Will traders double down on herding or pivot if momentum stalls?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:20 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Ameriprise Financial has delivered a strong share price run over the past five years, yet current valuation checks suggest the stock may still trade below an intrinsic value estimate based on an Excess Returns model and on earnings multiples."
"Ameriprise and LPL Financial, are in or near buy zones in the ongoing stock market action."
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between those who see *some* potential in AMP and those who dismiss it outright. Morgan Housel and Edgar Lawrence Smith both rate it as a ‘reasonable’ or ‘quiet compounder’ holding, suggesting its steady, predictable growth aligns with their patient, long-term frameworks. However, even these two stop short of an unqualified endorsement, with Smith calling it merely ‘not a clear long-term holding.’ In contrast, Fisher, Lynch, and the Enterprising Investor’s Graham approach reject it entirely—Fisher because it lacks his signature quality/growth blend, Lynch because it fails his ‘growth at a reasonable price’ test, and Graham’s stricter criteria because it’s not statistically cheap enough. Meanwhile, the market-efficiency camp and Marks’ risk-averse lens flag it as overvalued or speculative, while Livermore and Schwager’s neutral scores imply it’s too ambiguous for decisive action. The divide hinges on whether the stock’s stability (appealing to Housel and Smith) outweighs its valuation or growth deficiencies (a red flag for Fisher, Lynch, and Graham).
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 80
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 64
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 57
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 42
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 30
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 17
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
18.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
54.4%
ROA
1.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$36.85
Cash
$11.16B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.8.2026 | $1.700 |
| 2.8.2026 | $1.700 |
| 4.5.2026 | $1.700 |
| 3.5.2026 | $1.700 |
| 9.2.2026 | $1.600 |
| 8.2.2026 | $1.600 |
| 10.11.2025 | $1.600 |
| 9.11.2025 | $1.600 |
| 4.8.2025 | $1.600 |
| 3.8.2025 | $1.600 |
| 5.5.2025 | $1.600 |
| 4.5.2025 | $1.600 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$66.69
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$48.40
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Barchart · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Ameriprise Financial (AMP) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AMP currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AMP's technical score is 53/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Return on equity (ROE): 54.4% — strong; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — AMP has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MELLOH HEATHER J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 722 | -722 | — |
| MELLOH HEATHER J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 469 | -469 | $559.62 |
| MELLOH HEATHER J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 722 | +722 | $197.87 |
| Brockman Dawn M. | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 472 | -472 | $558.93 |
| MELLOH HEATHER J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 4,406 | +722 | $197.87 |
| MELLOH HEATHER J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 3,937 | -469 | $559.62 |
| MELLOH HEATHER J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 0 | -722 | — |
| Brockman Dawn M. | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 713 | -472 | $558.93 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | — |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $165.41 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 2,191 | -2,191 | $558.08 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 2,400 | -2,400 | $558.28 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | — |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | — |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $298.09 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $197.87 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 5,964 | +1,000 | $165.41 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 7,964 | +1,000 | $298.09 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 6,964 | +1,000 | $197.87 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 5,773 | -2,191 | $558.08 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 3,373 | -2,400 | $558.28 |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 1,034 | -1,000 | — |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 2,143 | -1,000 | — |
| McGraw Deirdre Davey | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.8.2026 | 1,015 | -1,000 | — |
| WILLIAMS CHRISTOPHER J | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 37.732 | +37.732 | $546.62 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,781,402 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,883,990 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
68.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology