Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$197.31
▼ $0.16 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:47 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$32.17B
Day Range
$192.65 - $199.76
52-Week Range
$114.63 - $336.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$138.03
Resistance
$199.76
ZS is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-32.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 15/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 25.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $135.74 vs. price $197.31 (-31.2%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
4d ago · $191.73
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 25 to 50 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $191.73
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 16 to 53 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
88
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
35
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Zscaler, Inc. highlights its aggressive expansion into AI-driven cybersecurity, particularly with the launch of **Zscaler Agentic SOC**, a new platform designed to detect and respond to AI-powered threats in real time. The company also reported strong **25% revenue and ARR growth** in Q4 FY26, though analysts note concerns about slowing future ARR growth. Additionally, Zscaler’s **Z-Flex flexible contract model** has surged, contributing to a near-30% increase in customer ARR, signaling broader platform adoption. Market sentiment remains mixed amid broader economic uncertainty.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Zscaler, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 17 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
46
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
75
Fundamentals
35
Technical
88
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+58%
Market Narrative
89
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+48
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a paradox: extreme positive sentiment (100/100) coexists with negative momentum (-7.4%) and elevated volatility (1.16x ATR), indicating potential overvaluation (19% above DCF) may be masking underlying uncertainty. The lack of dominant state reflects conflicting signals—euphoria driven by sentiment clashes with overconfidence from valuation gaps. The key question is whether the narrative gap (18-point disparity) will widen or correct, given the disconnect between price action and fundamentals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:24 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Zscaler Agentic SOC [...] detect, investigate, and respond to threats at machine speed"
"Z-Flex tops $1.7 billion in fiscal 2026 TCV, lifting customer ARR nearly 30%"
"Macquarie Raises Price Target on Zscaler to $200 From $172"
"Zscaler's Q4 FY26 beat estimates, but FY27 guidance points to slowing ARR growth"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 66/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements about risk, timing, and valuation. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score suggests he sees a cyclical opportunity near an oversold trough, while the majority—including Fisher, Lynch, and even Marks—cautiously flag mixed signals or modest quality, implying the stock’s strengths are either overpriced or not compelling enough for long-term holds. On the extreme ends, Graham’s near-failure of defensive metrics and Loeb’s risk warning contrast sharply with Nelson’s bullish cycle view, highlighting a clash between strict value discipline and speculative momentum analysis. Meanwhile, the efficient-market camp and Veblen’s critique underscore skepticism about picking this stock over broader indices or questioning its growth motives, further polarizing the debate between active selection and passive or critical perspectives.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 66
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 55
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 48
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 40
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 35
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 26
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 24
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 12
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 8
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
76.8%
Operating Margin
-4.0%
Net Margin
-1.9%
EBITDA Margin
0.5%
ROE
-2.4%
ROA
-0.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.39
Cash
$928.35M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.70
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$197.31
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$135.74
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-31.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $1.07B | $977.47M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $1.27B | $1.07B |
| 3 | 13.8% | $1.45B | $1.12B |
| 4 | 8.1% | $1.56B | $1.11B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.60B | $1.04B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$852.35M
Terminal Value
$25.28B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$16.43B
Enterprise Value
$21.75B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$21.75B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$16.22
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.28
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 17 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ZS currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ZS's estimated fair value is $135.74, which is 31.2% below the current price of $197.31. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ZS's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 25.4%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Current ratio: 1.70.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $135.74 vs. price $197.31 (-31.2%); Operating margin: -4.0% (negative); Net margin: -1.9% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ZS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 291 | -291 | $172.53 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 92 | -92 | $173.53 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 6 | -6 | $176.49 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 48 | -48 | $174.54 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 66 | -66 | $175.78 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 40,967 | -48 | $174.54 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 41,107 | -291 | $172.53 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 41,015 | -92 | $173.53 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 40,895 | -6 | $176.49 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 40,901 | -66 | $175.78 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 96 | -96 | $146.75 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 75 | -75 | $145.71 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 142 | -142 | $148.81 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 118 | -118 | $147.74 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 72 | -72 | $144.74 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 41,829 | -72 | $144.74 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 41,754 | -75 | $145.71 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 41,658 | -96 | $146.75 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 41,540 | -118 | $147.74 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 41,398 | -142 | $148.81 |
| Schlossman Robert | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 122 | -122 | $150.00 |
| Schlossman Robert | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 69,244 | -122 | $150.00 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 560 | -560 | $124.87 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 1,696 | -1,696 | $124.07 |
| RUBIN KEVIN | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 12 | -12 | $126.79 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,352,963 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,418,898 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology