Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$10.10
▲ $1.27 (+14.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:08 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$836.30M
Day Range
$9.20 - $10.30
52-Week Range
$4.92 - $112.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
Support
$4.92
Resistance
$10.30
ABTC is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-91.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 158.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -123.1% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $10.10
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 28 to 56 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
16d ago · $9.34
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 22 to 62 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
66
Risk
26
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
26
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **American Bitcoin Corp.** has centered on its one-year anniversary as a publicly traded company, with Eric Trump emphasizing its mission to position the U.S. as a global Bitcoin leader. Highlights include the company’s reported daily Bitcoin mining output of 11–13 BTC at 49% profit margins, though its stock has faced volatility amid broader crypto market fluctuations and macroeconomic factors like labor data and Fed policy signals. The focus remains on its expansion in the Bitcoin economy despite stock performance challenges.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Bitcoin Corp.. News trend score: 62. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
50
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
28
Psychology
81
Fundamentals
26
Technical
66
Valuation
50
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-21%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
28
Narrative Gap
+44
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ABTC’s psychology is dominated by **loss aversion**, consistent with a prolonged drawdown (-38.3% in three months) and elevated trading volume. Confirmation bias (score: 20) suggests investors cherry-pick positive narratives despite deteriorating fundamentals (e.g., shrinking margins). Overconfidence (6) hints at traders betting on momentum despite weak EPS growth, while FOMO and panic remain muted. The key question is whether the narrative gap (48 vs. 28) will widen further or if fundamentals force a reckoning—potentially shifting focus from loss aversion to overconfidence or panic if declines accelerate.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:12 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"BTIG initiated coverage ... with a Buy rating and a $15 price target"
"Eric Trump celebrated the first anniversary ... reiterating the vision of making the U.S. a leader in the Bitcoin economy"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 22D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 76/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for ABTC reflects deep methodological disagreements about risk, valuation, and market psychology. Mackay and Marks (cycle) see it as a relatively stable, early-to-mid-cycle opportunity, avoiding crowd-driven extremes, while Fisher and Smith acknowledge its merits but lack the conviction for long-term holds. Meanwhile, Graham’s strict defensive framework and Bagehot’s liquidity concerns slam the door shut entirely, dismissing it as structurally risky. Lynch and Veblen highlight a tension between growth and overpricing—growth exists, but Veblen’s critique suggests it’s being chased for speculative reasons, while Lynch warns the price already embeds most of its upside. At the extremes, Livermore and Loeb’s red flags (trend resistance and capital-threatening risk) clash with the more nuanced mid-cycle assessments, illustrating how even similar scores (like Nelson’s and Schwager’s) can reflect indifference rather than consensus.
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 65
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 52
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 48
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 42
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 13
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 7
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
50.3%
Operating Margin
-123.1%
Net Margin
-82.7%
EBITDA Margin
-91.7%
ROE
-23.0%
ROA
-12.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.17
Cash
$3.82M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.08
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$0.74
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.56
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 8 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 19.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Benzinga · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
TheStreet · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
BeInCrypto · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 30.8.2026
Stocktwits · 30.8.2026
American Bitcoin Corp. (ABTC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ABTC currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ABTC's technical score is 66/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 158.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -123.1% (negative); Net margin: -82.7% (negative); ATR: 8.4% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ABTC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 5 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mateen Justin | Open Market Purchase | 6.8.2026 | 162,438 | +162,438 | $6.19 |
| Mateen Justin | Open Market Purchase | 6.8.2026 | 492,297 | +162,438 | $6.19 |
| Mateen Justin | Open Market Purchase | 5.8.2026 | 144,543 | +144,543 | $6.40 |
| Mateen Justin | Open Market Purchase | 5.8.2026 | 329,859 | +144,543 | $6.40 |
| Busch Richard | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 46,404 | +46,404 | — |
| Mateen Justin | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 46,404 | +46,404 | — |
| Broukhim Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 49,304 | +49,304 | — |
| Mateen Justin | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 46,404 | +46,404 | — |
| Busch Richard | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 46,404 | +46,404 | — |
| Broukhim Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 49,304 | +49,304 | — |
| Busch Richard | Other Transaction | 24.6.2026 | 254,778 | -254,778 | — |
| Busch Richard | Other Transaction | 24.6.2026 | 1,848,975 | -254,778 | — |
| Broukhim Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 270,701 | +270,701 | — |
| Broukhim Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 270,701 | -270,701 | — |
| Busch Richard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 254,778 | -254,778 | — |
| Busch Richard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 254,778 | +254,778 | — |
| Mateen Justin | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 254,778 | -254,778 | — |
| Mateen Justin | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 254,778 | +254,778 | — |
| Mateen Justin | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 2,779,753 | +254,778 | — |
| Mateen Justin | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 0 | -254,778 | — |
| Broukhim Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 270,701 | +270,701 | — |
| Broukhim Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 0 | -270,701 | — |
| Busch Richard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 2,103,753 | +254,778 | — |
| Busch Richard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.6.2026 | 0 | -254,778 | — |
| Busch Richard | Open Market Purchase | 15.6.2026 | 450,000 | +450,000 | $0.87 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,317,197 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,142,903 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology