Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$105.17
▲ $7.11 (+7.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:14 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$8.89B
Day Range
$98.52 - $105.44
52-Week Range
$18.50 - $233.67
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$76.01
Resistance
$160.99
AAOI is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+262.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 82.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$147.04 vs. price $105.17 (-239.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
42
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
36
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) has focused on its steep stock decline—down 46.3% in three months—despite strong AI-driven demand for high-speed optical products like 800G and 1.6T transceivers. Analysts debate whether the pullback reflects overvaluation or supply constraints, positioning AAOI alongside peers like Lumentum and Coherent in the competitive AI-driven optics sector. While growth remains robust, market volatility and valuation concerns have sparked discussions about timing potential investments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
69
Fundamentals
36
Technical
42
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-35%
Market Narrative
66
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant *Loss Aversion* reflects a defensive posture, amplified by a prolonged drawdown (-36.2% in three months) and subdued trading activity (0.68x average volume). While *Herding* (score 49) hints at cautious peer alignment, the absence of panic (score 22) or euphoria (7) suggests traders are neither fleeing nor chasing. The narrow narrative gap (-4) implies a fragile equilibrium—participants may be waiting for clarity rather than acting impulsively. The key question: *Will the lack of volatility (0.77x ATR) persist, or will a catalyst (e.g., earnings, sector shift) force a re-evaluation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:59 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI datacenter spending has turned optical networking into one of 2026's hottest trades"
"Vertiv, Applied Optoelectronics, and Innodata entered September well below their 2026 highs despite strong operating growth"
"heavy capex, weak cash conversion and crowded product ramps keep execution risk elevated"
"demand is outpacing [AI server] supply by multiples"
📈 22D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 29/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits methodologies into two stark camps: the bullish camp, led by Mackay, Lynch, and Bagehot, who see it as a low-risk, high-potential opportunity, with scores above 90. Mackay’s near-perfect score suggests no crowd-driven mania, while Lynch and Bagehot highlight its growth potential and liquidity resilience, respectively. On the other end, Fisher, Livermore, and Housel—along with the efficient-market camp—reject it outright, with scores below 50. Fisher dismisses it for lacking his signature of quality and growth, Livermore’s low score reflects a clear downtrend, and Housel’s warning about volatility aligns with the efficient-market view that active picking here is unnecessary. In the middle, Marks and Smith offer cautious optimism, with Smith calling it a 'buy-and-hold' candidate, while Graham’s split verdict and Loeb’s moderate risk warning reflect uncertainty about valuation and risk. The divide hinges on whether the stock’s growth and liquidity justify active selection (bulls) or if its volatility and lack of Fisherian traits make it better suited for passive strategies (bears).
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 94
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 87
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 60
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 55
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 42
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 31
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 29
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
30.0%
Operating Margin
-12.0%
Net Margin
-8.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-5.2%
ROA
-3.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.64
Cash
$206.14M
Total Debt
$33.98M
Current Ratio
2.63
Debt/Equity
0.27
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$105.17
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$147.04
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-239.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-441.97M | $-405.48M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-527.60M | $-444.07M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-600.15M | $-463.42M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-648.91M | $-459.70M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-665.13M | $-432.29M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-353.58M
Terminal Value
$-10.49B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-6.82B
Enterprise Value
$-9.02B
Net Debt
$-172.16M
Equity Value
$-8.85B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.79
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.74
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Barchart · 9.9.2026
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AAOI currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AAOI's estimated fair value is -$147.04, which is 239.8% below the current price of $105.17. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AAOI's technical score is 42/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 82.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 85.8%; Net income growth: 79.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$147.04 vs. price $105.17 (-239.8%); Operating margin: -12.0% (negative); Net margin: -8.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AAOI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murry Stefan J. | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 4,000 | -4,000 | $105.33 |
| Chang Hung-Lun (Fred) | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 32,172 | -32,172 | $110.21 |
| Yeh Shu-Hua (Joshua) | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $147.73 |
| Murry Stefan J. | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 4,000 | -4,000 | $144.79 |
| Murry Stefan J. | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 371,168 | -4,000 | $144.79 |
| Yeh Shu-Hua (Joshua) | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 4,715 | -4,715 | $126.50 |
| Yeh Shu-Hua (Joshua) | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 383,498 | -4,715 | $126.50 |
| Lin Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 9,251 | +9,251 | — |
| Lin Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 1,296,047 | +9,251 | — |
| Yeh Shu-Hua (Joshua) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 686 | -686 | $119.26 |
| Yeh Shu-Hua (Joshua) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 861 | -861 | $119.26 |
| Yeh Shu-Hua (Joshua) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 609 | -609 | $119.26 |
| Lin Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 2,524 | -2,524 | $119.26 |
| Lin Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 2,031 | -2,031 | $119.26 |
| Lin Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 2,332 | -2,332 | $119.26 |
| Yeh Shu-Hua (Joshua) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 2,553 | -2,553 | $119.26 |
| Lin Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 8,753 | -8,753 | $119.26 |
| Chang Hung-Lun (Fred) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 616 | -616 | $119.26 |
| Murry Stefan J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 770 | -770 | $119.26 |
| Chang Hung-Lun (Fred) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 773 | -773 | $119.26 |
| Chang Hung-Lun (Fred) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 613 | -613 | $119.26 |
| Chang Hung-Lun (Fred) | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 2,674 | -2,674 | $119.26 |
| Murry Stefan J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 988 | -988 | $119.26 |
| Murry Stefan J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 679 | -679 | $119.26 |
| Murry Stefan J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.7.2026 | 2,971 | -2,971 | $119.26 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,086,618 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 10,434,298 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology